Yanxia Liu1, Hongyu Shi1, Sijuan Huang2, Xiaochuan Chen1, Huimin Zhou2,3, Hui Chang2, Yunfei Xia2, Guohua Wang1, Xin Yang2. 1. School of Software Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China. 2. Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou 510060, China. 3. Department of Oncology, the Seventy-fourth Group Army Hospital of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Guangzhou 510318, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute xerostomia is the most common side effect of radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck (H&N) malignancies. Investigating radiation-induced changes of computed tomography (CT) radiomics in parotid glands (PGs) and saliva amount (SA) can predict acute xerostomia during the RT for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). METHODS: CT and SA data from 35 patients with stages I-IVB were randomly collected from an NPC clinical trial registered on the clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT01762514). All patients received radical treatment based on intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) with a prescription dose of 68.1 Gy in 30 fractions. The patients' ages ranged 24-72 years, and each patient had five CT sets acquired at treatment position: at the 0th, 10th, 20th, 30th fractions during the RT, and at 3-month later after the RT. The PGs for each CT set were delineated by a radiation oncologist and verified independently by another. Patients' saliva was collected every other 10 days during the RT. Acute xerostomia was evaluated based on the RTOG acute toxicity scoring and the SA. In total, 1,703 radiomics features were calculated for PGs from each CT set, including feature value at 0th fraction (FV0F), FV10F, and delta FV (ΔFV10F-0F), respectively. Extensive experiments were conducted to achieve the optimal results. RidgeCV and Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) were used for feature selection, while linear regression was used for predicting SA30F. Four more patients were added for independent testing. RESULTS: Substantial changes in various radiomics metrics of PGs were observed during the RT. Eight normalized feature value (NFV), selected from NFV0F, predicted SA10F with a mean square error (MSE) of 0.9042 and a R2 score of 0.7406. Fourteen NFV, selected from ΔNFV10F-0F, NFV0F, and NFV10F to predict SA30F, showed the best predictive ability with an MSE of 0.0569. The model predicted the level of acute xerostomia with a precision of 0.9220 and a sensitivity of 100%, compared to the clinical observed SA. For the independent test, the MSE of PSA30F was 0.0233. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that radiation-induced acute xerostomia level could be early predicted based on the SA and radiomics changes of the PGs during IMRT delivery. SA, NFV0F, NFV10F, and especially ΔNFV10F-0F provided the best performance on acute xerostomia prediction for individual patient based on RidgeCV_RFE_LinearRegression method of delta radiomics.
BACKGROUND: Acute xerostomia is the most common side effect of radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck (H&N) malignancies. Investigating radiation-induced changes of computed tomography (CT) radiomics in parotid glands (PGs) and saliva amount (SA) can predict acute xerostomia during the RT for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). METHODS: CT and SA data from 35 patients with stages I-IVB were randomly collected from an NPC clinical trial registered on the clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT01762514). All patients received radical treatment based on intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) with a prescription dose of 68.1 Gy in 30 fractions. The patients' ages ranged 24-72 years, and each patient had five CT sets acquired at treatment position: at the 0th, 10th, 20th, 30th fractions during the RT, and at 3-month later after the RT. The PGs for each CT set were delineated by a radiation oncologist and verified independently by another. Patients' saliva was collected every other 10 days during the RT. Acute xerostomia was evaluated based on the RTOG acute toxicity scoring and the SA. In total, 1,703 radiomics features were calculated for PGs from each CT set, including feature value at 0th fraction (FV0F), FV10F, and delta FV (ΔFV10F-0F), respectively. Extensive experiments were conducted to achieve the optimal results. RidgeCV and Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) were used for feature selection, while linear regression was used for predicting SA30F. Four more patients were added for independent testing. RESULTS: Substantial changes in various radiomics metrics of PGs were observed during the RT. Eight normalized feature value (NFV), selected from NFV0F, predicted SA10F with a mean square error (MSE) of 0.9042 and a R2 score of 0.7406. Fourteen NFV, selected from ΔNFV10F-0F, NFV0F, and NFV10F to predict SA30F, showed the best predictive ability with an MSE of 0.0569. The model predicted the level of acute xerostomia with a precision of 0.9220 and a sensitivity of 100%, compared to the clinical observed SA. For the independent test, the MSE of PSA30F was 0.0233. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that radiation-induced acute xerostomia level could be early predicted based on the SA and radiomics changes of the PGs during IMRT delivery. SA, NFV0F, NFV10F, and especially ΔNFV10F-0F provided the best performance on acute xerostomia prediction for individual patient based on RidgeCV_RFE_LinearRegression method of delta radiomics.
Authors: Arjan Vissink; James B Mitchell; Bruce J Baum; Kirsten H Limesand; Siri Beier Jensen; Philip C Fox; Linda S Elting; Johannes A Langendijk; Robert P Coppes; Mary E Reyland Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-11-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Virendra Kumar; Yuhua Gu; Satrajit Basu; Anders Berglund; Steven A Eschrich; Matthew B Schabath; Kenneth Forster; Hugo J W L Aerts; Andre Dekker; David Fenstermacher; Dmitry B Goldgof; Lawrence O Hall; Philippe Lambin; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Robert A Gatenby; Robert J Gillies Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-08-13 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Naresh Jha; Jonathan Harris; Hadi Seikaly; John R Jacobs; A J B McEwan; K Thomas Robbins; John Grecula; Anand K Sharma; K Kian Ang Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Philippe Lambin; Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez; Ralph Leijenaar; Sara Carvalho; Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Patrick Granton; Catharina M L Zegers; Robert Gillies; Ronald Boellard; André Dekker; Hugo J W L Aerts Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2012-01-16 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: S Tribius; J Sommer; C Prosch; A Bajrovic; A Muenscher; M Blessmann; A Kruell; C Petersen; M Todorovic; P Tennstedt Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2013-01-27 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Hugo J W L Aerts; Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Chintan Parmar; Patrick Grossmann; Sara Carvalho; Sara Cavalho; Johan Bussink; René Monshouwer; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Derek Rietveld; Frank Hoebers; Michelle M Rietbergen; C René Leemans; Andre Dekker; John Quackenbush; Robert J Gillies; Philippe Lambin Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Navid Hasani; Sriram S Paravastu; Faraz Farhadi; Fereshteh Yousefirizi; Michael A Morris; Arman Rahmim; Mark Roschewski; Ronald M Summers; Babak Saboury Journal: PET Clin Date: 2022-01