Jinzhong Yang1, Lifei Zhang2, Xenia J Fave2, David V Fried2, Francesco C Stingo3, Chaan S Ng4, Laurence E Court2. 1. Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA. Electronic address: jyang4@mdanderson.org. 2. Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA. 3. Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA. 4. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the uncertainty of quantitative imaging features extracted from contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans of lung cancer patients in terms of the dependency on the time after contrast injection and the feature reproducibility between scans. METHODS: Eight patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT scans of lung tumors on two sessions 2-7 days apart. Each session included 6 CT scans of the same anatomy taken every 15s, starting 50s after contrast injection. Image features based on intensity histogram, co-occurrence matrix, neighborhood gray-tone difference matrix, run-length matrix, and geometric shape were extracted from the tumor for each scan. Spearman's correlation was used to examine the dependency of features on the time after contrast injection, with values over 0.50 considered time-dependent. Concordance correlation coefficients were calculated to examine the reproducibility of each feature between times of scans after contrast injection and between scanning sessions, with values greater than 0.90 considered reproducible. RESULTS: The features were found to have little dependency on the time between the contrast injection and the CT scan. Most features were reproducible between times of scans after contrast injection and between scanning sessions. Some features were more reproducible when they were extracted from a CT scan performed at a longer time after contrast injection. CONCLUSION: The quantitative imaging features tested here are mostly reproducible and show little dependency on the time after contrast injection.
PURPOSE: To assess the uncertainty of quantitative imaging features extracted from contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans of lung cancerpatients in terms of the dependency on the time after contrast injection and the feature reproducibility between scans. METHODS: Eight patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT scans of lung tumors on two sessions 2-7 days apart. Each session included 6 CT scans of the same anatomy taken every 15s, starting 50s after contrast injection. Image features based on intensity histogram, co-occurrence matrix, neighborhood gray-tone difference matrix, run-length matrix, and geometric shape were extracted from the tumor for each scan. Spearman's correlation was used to examine the dependency of features on the time after contrast injection, with values over 0.50 considered time-dependent. Concordance correlation coefficients were calculated to examine the reproducibility of each feature between times of scans after contrast injection and between scanning sessions, with values greater than 0.90 considered reproducible. RESULTS: The features were found to have little dependency on the time between the contrast injection and the CT scan. Most features were reproducible between times of scans after contrast injection and between scanning sessions. Some features were more reproducible when they were extracted from a CT scan performed at a longer time after contrast injection. CONCLUSION: The quantitative imaging features tested here are mostly reproducible and show little dependency on the time after contrast injection.
Authors: Chaan S Ng; Adam G Chandler; Wei Wei; Ella F Anderson; Delise H Herron; Chusilp Charnsangavej; Razelle Kurzrock Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Balaji Ganeshan; Vicky Goh; Henry C Mandeville; Quan Sing Ng; Peter J Hoskin; Kenneth A Miles Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-11-20 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: He Wang; Lei Dong; Jennifer O'Daniel; Radhe Mohan; Adam S Garden; K Kian Ang; Deborah A Kuban; Mark Bonnen; Joe Y Chang; Rex Cheung Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2005-06-01 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Philippe Lambin; Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez; Ralph Leijenaar; Sara Carvalho; Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Patrick Granton; Catharina M L Zegers; Robert Gillies; Ronald Boellard; André Dekker; Hugo J W L Aerts Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2012-01-16 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Yoganand Balagurunathan; Yuhua Gu; Hua Wang; Virendra Kumar; Olya Grove; Sam Hawkins; Jongphil Kim; Dmitry B Goldgof; Lawrence O Hall; Robert A Gatenby; Robert J Gillies Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2014-02-01 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Chaan S Ng; Adam G Chandler; Wei Wei; Ella F Anderson; Delise H Herron; Razelle Kurzrock; Chusilp Charnsangavej Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2013-06-13 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Hugo J W L Aerts; Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Chintan Parmar; Patrick Grossmann; Sara Carvalho; Sara Cavalho; Johan Bussink; René Monshouwer; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Derek Rietveld; Frank Hoebers; Michelle M Rietbergen; C René Leemans; Andre Dekker; John Quackenbush; Robert J Gillies; Philippe Lambin Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Thomas Perrin; Abhishek Midya; Rikiya Yamashita; Jayasree Chakraborty; Tome Saidon; William R Jarnagin; Mithat Gonen; Amber L Simpson; Richard K G Do Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2018-12
Authors: Usman Mahmood; Aditya P Apte; Joseph O Deasy; C Ross Schmidtlein; Amita Shukla-Dave Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2017 Nov/Dec Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Bruno Hochhegger; Matheus Zanon; Stephan Altmayer; Gabriel S Pacini; Fernanda Balbinot; Martina Z Francisco; Ruhana Dalla Costa; Guilherme Watte; Marcel Koenigkam Santos; Marcelo C Barros; Diana Penha; Klaus Irion; Edson Marchiori Journal: Lung Date: 2018-10-09 Impact factor: 2.584
Authors: Zijian Zhang; Jinzhong Yang; Angela Ho; Wen Jiang; Jennifer Logan; Xin Wang; Paul D Brown; Susan L McGovern; Nandita Guha-Thakurta; Sherise D Ferguson; Xenia Fave; Lifei Zhang; Dennis Mackin; Laurence E Court; Jing Li Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-11-24 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Rachel B Ger; Carlos E Cardenas; Brian M Anderson; Jinzhong Yang; Dennis S Mackin; Lifei Zhang; Laurence E Court Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Marie-Charlotte Desseroit; Florent Tixier; Wolfgang A Weber; Barry A Siegel; Catherine Cheze Le Rest; Dimitris Visvikis; Mathieu Hatt Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2016-10-20 Impact factor: 10.057