| Literature DB >> 29177754 |
Avinash Kaur1, Om P Kharbanda2, Priyanka Kapoor3, Dinesh Kalyanasundaram1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The temporary anchorage devices (TADs) which include miniscrew implants (MSIs) have evolved as useful armamentarium in the management of severe malocclusions and assist in complex tooth movements. Although a multitude of factors is responsible for the primary and secondary stability of miniscrew implants, contemporary research highlights the importance of biological interface of MSI with bone and soft tissue in augmenting the success of implants. The inflammation and remodeling associated with MSI insertion or loading are reflected through biomarkers in peri-miniscrew implant crevicular fluid (PMICF) which is analogous to the gingival crevicular fluid. Analysis of biomarkers in PMICF provides indicators of inflammation at the implant site, osteoclast differentiation and activation, bone resorption activity and bone turnover. The PMICF for assessment of these biomarkers can be collected non-invasively via paper strips, periopaper or micro capillary pipettes and analysed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or immunoassays. The markers and mediators of inflammation have been previously studied in relation to orthodontic tooth movement include interleukins (IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6 and IL-8), growth factors and other proteins like tumour necrosis factor (TNF-α), receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), chondroitin sulphate (CS) and osteoprotegerin (OPG). Studies have indicated that successful and failed MSIs have different concentrations of biomarkers in PMICF. However, there is a lack of comprehensive information on this aspect of MSIs. Therefore, a detailed review was conducted on the subject.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarker; IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8; OPG; Orthodontic tooth movement (OTM); Peri-miniscrew implant crevicular fluid (PMICF); RANKL; TNF-α
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29177754 PMCID: PMC5702602 DOI: 10.1186/s40510-017-0195-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prog Orthod ISSN: 1723-7785 Impact factor: 2.750
Fig. 1Factors affecting implant stability
Studies on Biomarkers in PMICF
| S.No | Reference | Biomarkers | Method of collection | Analysis method | No. of patients | Duration of study (days) | Time at which significant variation was achieved | Concentration* | Percentage difference (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before loading implant | After loading implant | Control | |||||||||
| 1 | Monga et al. [5] | Interleukin-1β | Micro capillary pipettes | ELISA | 11 | 300 | After 24 h of loading | 0.13 pg/μL | 0.27 pg/μL | - | |
| 2 | Sari et al. [17] | Interleukin-1β | Paper strips | ELISA | 10 | 21 | After 24 h of loading | - | 22.0 ± 2.5 pg/μL | 19.6 ± 2.6 pg/μL | 12.24 |
| 3 | Hamamci et al. [27] | Interleukin 2 | Paper strips | ELISA | 16 | 90 | After 24 h of loading | 65.20 ± 20.73 pg/μL | 74.19 ± 30.36 pg/μL | 70.01 ± 31.24 pg/μL | -6.87, 5.97 |
| 4 | Hamamci et al. [27] | Interleukin 6 | Paper strips | ELISA | 16 | 90 | After 24 h of loading | 3.01 ± 0.82 pg/μL | 3.36 ± 0.97 pg/μL | 2.92 ± 1.15 pg/μL | 3.08, 15.06 |
| 5 | Hamamci et al. [27] | Interleukin 8 | Paper strips | ELISA | 16 | 90 | After 24 h of loading | 77.84 ± 12.59 pg/μL | 83.52 ± 14.34 pg/μL | 78.56 ± 17.10 pg/μL | -0.91, 6.31 |
| 6 | Kaya et al. [28] | Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) | Paper strips | ELISA | 16 | 90 | After 24 h of loading | 31.38 ± 5.99 pg/μL | 32.00 ± 4.50 pg/μL | 31.91 ± 7.26 pg/μL | -1.66, 0.28 |
| 7 | Enhos et al. [34] | Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) | Paper strips | ELISA | 20 | 30 | After 24 h of loading | 3935.42 pg/μL | 4631.25 pg/μL | - | |
| 8 | Enhos et al. [34] | Osteoprotegerin (OPG) | Paper strips | ELISA | 20 | 30 | After 24 h of loading | 81.06 pg/μL | 72.74 pg/μL | - | |
| 9 | Intachai et al. [40] | Chondroitin sulphate (CS) | Paper strips | ELISA | 10 | 35 | After 28 days of loading | 758.03 pg/μL | 1025.11 pg/μL | - | |
* The concentration of biomarkers were converted into pg/µL for uniformity