Literature DB >> 29153081

Risks and benefits of Twitter use by hematologists/oncologists in the era of digital medicine.

Deanna J Attai1, Patricia F Anderson2, Michael J Fisch3, David L Graham4, Matthew S Katz5, Jennifer Kesselheim6, Merry Jennifer Markham7, Nathan A Pennell8, Mina S Sedrak9, Michael A Thompson10, Audun Utengen11, Don S Dizon12.   

Abstract

Twitter use by physicians, including those in the hematology-oncology field, is increasing. This microblogging platform provides a means to communicate and collaborate on a global scale. For the oncology professional, an active Twitter presence provides opportunities for continuing medical education, patient engagement and education, personal branding, and reputation management. However, because Twitter is an open, public forum, potential risks such as patient privacy violations, personal information disclosures, professionalism lapses, and time management need to be considered and managed. The authors have summarized the benefits and risks of Twitter use by the hematology-oncology physician. In addition, strategies to maximize benefit and minimize risk are discussed, and resources for additional learning are provided.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Digital engagement; Health information; Hematologist–Oncologist; Patient education; Social media; Twitter

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29153081      PMCID: PMC5994350          DOI: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2017.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Hematol        ISSN: 0037-1963            Impact factor:   3.851


  39 in total

1.  To friend or not to friend? Social networking and faculty perceptions of online professionalism.

Authors:  Katherine C Chretien; Jeanne M Farnan; S Ryan Greysen; Terry Kind
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Physician violations of online professionalism and disciplinary actions: a national survey of state medical boards.

Authors:  S Ryan Greysen; Katherine C Chretien; Terry Kind; Aaron Young; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Bradford W Hesse; David E Nelson; Gary L Kreps; Robert T Croyle; Neeraj K Arora; Barbara K Rimer; Kasisomayajula Viswanath
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005 Dec 12-26

4.  Professionalism in the digital age.

Authors:  Arash Mostaghimi; Bradley H Crotty
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Financial Conflicts of Interest Among Hematologist-Oncologists on Twitter.

Authors:  Derrick L Tao; Aaron Boothby; Joel McLouth; Vinay Prasad
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Physicians, social media, and conflict of interest.

Authors:  Matthew Decamp
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  The social media revolution is changing the conference experience: analytics and trends from eight international meetings.

Authors:  Sarah E Wilkinson; Marnique Y Basto; Greta Perovic; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Declan G Murphy
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 8.  Social Media and Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN)--Focus on Twitter and the Development of a Disease-specific Community: #MPNSM.

Authors:  Naveen Pemmaraju; Vikas Gupta; Ruben Mesa; Michael A Thompson
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.952

9.  Social networking in online support groups for health: how online social networking benefits patients.

Authors:  Jae Eun Chung
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2013-04-04

10.  Twitter Social Media is an Effective Tool for Breast Cancer Patient Education and Support: Patient-Reported Outcomes by Survey.

Authors:  Deanna J Attai; Michael S Cowher; Mohammed Al-Hamadani; Jody M Schoger; Alicia C Staley; Jeffrey Landercasper
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Social Media and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: a Review of Online Resources and Communities.

Authors:  Sagar S Patel; Navneet S Majhail
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 2.  Popular Media and Cardiovascular Medicine: "with Great Power There Must Also Come Great Responsibility".

Authors:  Anandita Agarwala; Payal Kohli; Salim S Virani
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 3.  #PauseBeforeYouPost: Ethical and Legal Issues Involving Medical Social Media.

Authors:  Eric J Keller; Vongai C Mlambo; Scott A Resnick; Robert L Vogelzang
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 1.780

4.  Social Media and Oncology: The Time Is Now.

Authors:  Deanna J Attai; Don S Dizon
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2022-01-11

Review 5.  Social Media and Professional Development for Oncology Professionals.

Authors:  Anusha Chidharla; Audun Utengen; Deanna J Attai; Emily K Drake; G J van Londen; Ishwaria M Subbiah; Elizabeth Henry; Martina Murphy; Maura M Barry; Rami Manochakian; Scott Moerdler; Stacy Loeb; Stephanie L Graff; Yan Leyfman; Michael A Thompson; Merry J Markham
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2022-03-21

Review 6.  Online and Social Media Resources for Patients with MDS.

Authors:  Nour Abuhadra; Aziz Nazha
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 7.  Netiquette for social media engagement for oncology professionals.

Authors:  Sara Beltrán Ponce; Maura M Barry; Don S Dizon; Matthew S Katz; Martina Murphy; Eleonora Teplinsky; Stacey Tinianov; Deanna J Attai; Merry Jennifer Markham
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.674

8.  European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2018 Congress Twitter analysis: from ethics to results through the understanding of communication and interaction flows.

Authors:  Antonio Passaro; Graham Mackenzie; Matteo Lambertini; Gilberto Morgan; Stefan Zimmermann; Pilar Garrido; Giuseppe Curigliano; Dario Trapani
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2020-02-05

Review 9.  Tweeting from the Bench: Twitter and the Physician-Scientist Benefits and Challenges.

Authors:  Jessica S Little; Rizwan Romee
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.952

10.  Twitter As a Noninvasive Bio-Marker for Trends in Liver Disease.

Authors:  Ben L Da; Pallavi Surana; Samuel A Schueler; Niloofar Y Jalaly; Natasha Kamal; Sonia Taneja; Anusha Vittal; Christy L Gilman; Theo Heller; Christopher Koh
Journal:  Hepatol Commun       Date:  2019-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.