Literature DB >> 22030752

To friend or not to friend? Social networking and faculty perceptions of online professionalism.

Katherine C Chretien1, Jeanne M Farnan, S Ryan Greysen, Terry Kind.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess faculty perceptions of professional boundaries and trainee-posted content on social networking sites (SNS).
METHOD: In June 2010, the Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine conducted its annual survey of U.S. and Canadian member institutions. The survey included sections on demographics and social networking. The authors used descriptive statistics and tests of association to analyze the Likert scale responses and qualitatively analyzed the free-text responses.
RESULTS: Of 110 institutional members, 82 (75%) responded to the survey. Of the 40 respondents who reported current or past SNS use, 21 (53%) reported receiving a "friend request" from a current student and 25 (63%) from a current resident. Of these, 4 (19%) accepted the student request and 12 (48%) accepted the resident request. Sixty-three of 80 (79%) felt it was inappropriate to send a friend request to a current student, 61 (76%) to accept a current student's request, 42 (53%) to become friends with a current resident, and 61 (81%) to become friends with a current patient. Becoming friends with a former student, former resident, or colleague was perceived as more appropriate. Younger respondents were less likely to deem specific student behaviors inappropriate (odds ratio [OR] 0.18-0.79; adjusted OR 0.12-0.86, controlling for respondents' sex, rank, and SNS use), although none reached statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS: Some internal medicine educators are using SNSs and interacting with trainees online. Their perceptions on the appropriateness of social networking behaviors provide some consensus for professional boundaries between faculty and trainees in the digital world.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22030752     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182356128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  17 in total

1.  New professionalism challenges in medical training: an exploration of social networking.

Authors:  Jennifer C Kesselheim; Maneesh Batra; Frank Belmonte; Kimberly A Boland; Robert S McGregor
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-03

2.  Social media milestones: entrusting trainees to conduct themselves responsibly and professionally.

Authors:  Terry Kind
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-03

3.  Using social media to improve continuing medical education: a survey of course participants.

Authors:  Amy T Wang; Nicole P Sandhu; Christopher M Wittich; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Thomas J Beckman
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Dangers and opportunities for social media in medicine.

Authors:  Daniel R George; Liza S Rovniak; Jennifer L Kraschnewski
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.190

Review 5.  The Use of Social Media in Graduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Madeline Sterling; Peggy Leung; Drew Wright; Tara F Bishop
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  A Digital Ethnography of Medical Students who Use Twitter for Professional Development.

Authors:  Katherine C Chretien; Matthew G Tuck; Michael Simon; Lisa O Singh; Terry Kind
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Risks and benefits of Twitter use by hematologists/oncologists in the era of digital medicine.

Authors:  Deanna J Attai; Patricia F Anderson; Michael J Fisch; David L Graham; Matthew S Katz; Jennifer Kesselheim; Merry Jennifer Markham; Nathan A Pennell; Mina S Sedrak; Michael A Thompson; Audun Utengen; Don S Dizon
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 3.851

8.  The state of social media policies in higher education.

Authors:  Jeffrey Pomerantz; Carolyn Hank; Cassidy R Sugimoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  What are health-related users tweeting? A qualitative content analysis of health-related users and their messages on twitter.

Authors:  Joy L Lee; Matthew DeCamp; Mark Dredze; Margaret S Chisolm; Zackary D Berger
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 10.  The impact of social media on medical professionalism: a systematic qualitative review of challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Fatemeh Gholami-Kordkheili; Verina Wild; Daniel Strech
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.