Literature DB >> 23129160

Physicians, social media, and conflict of interest.

Matthew Decamp1.   

Abstract

Physicians and patients increasingly use social media technologies, such as Facebook, Twitter, and weblogs (blogs), both professionally and personally. Amidst recent reports of physician misbehavior online, as well as concerns about social media's potential negative effect on trust in the medical profession, several national-level physician organizations have created professional guidelines on social media use by physicians. Missing from these guidelines is adequate attention to conflict of interest. Some guidelines do not explicitly mention conflict of interest; others recommend only disclosure. Recommending disclosure fails to appreciate the unique features of social media that make adequate disclosure difficult to accomplish. Moreover, in emphasizing disclosure alone, current guidelines are inconsistent with medicine's general trend toward management or elimination, not just disclosure, of potential conflicts. Because social media sites typically rely on physicians' voluntary compliance with professional norms, physicians necessarily play a major role in shaping these norms' content and scope. To achieve the benefits of social media and ensure the veracity of social media content while preserving trust in the profession, physicians must reaffirm their commitment to disclose potential conflicts; advocate for better electronic disclosure mechanisms; and develop concrete management strategies-including, where necessary, the elimination of conflicts altogether.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23129160      PMCID: PMC3614128          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2251-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  38 in total

1.  Industry support of CME--are we at the tipping point?

Authors:  Michael A Steinman; C Seth Landefeld; Robert B Baron
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Net effect: professional and ethical challenges of medicine online.

Authors:  Arthur R Derse; Tracy E Miller
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Practicing medicine in the age of Facebook.

Authors:  Sachin H Jain
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Commentary: The relationship status of digital media and professionalism: it's complicated.

Authors:  Jeanne M Farnan; John A M Paro; Jennifer T Higa; Shalini T Reddy; Holly J Humphrey; Vineet M Arora
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Bradford W Hesse; David E Nelson; Gary L Kreps; Robert T Croyle; Neeraj K Arora; Barbara K Rimer; Kasisomayajula Viswanath
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005 Dec 12-26

6.  Privacy, professionalism and Facebook: a dilemma for young doctors.

Authors:  Joanna MacDonald; Sangsu Sohn; Pete Ellis
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  Online posting of unprofessional content by medical students.

Authors:  Katherine C Chretien; S Ryan Greysen; Jean-Paul Chretien; Terry Kind
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Social media policies at US medical schools.

Authors:  Terry Kind; Gillian Genrich; Avneet Sodhi; Katherine C Chretien
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2010-09-15

9.  Medical professionalism in the age of online social networking.

Authors:  J S Guseh; R W Brendel; D H Brendel
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Content of weblogs written by health professionals.

Authors:  Tara Lagu; Elinore J Kaufman; David A Asch; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  9 in total

1.  Social media in disaster risk reduction and crisis management.

Authors:  David E Alexander
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Social media: new opportunities, new ethical concerns.

Authors:  Paul A Pirraglia; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  A Twitter Education: Why Psychiatrists Should Tweet.

Authors:  Matthew E Peters; Elisabeth Uible; Margaret S Chisolm
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 4.  Social Media and Ethical Challenges for the Dermatologist.

Authors:  Michelle Militello; Ronald A Yang; Jaclyn B Anderson; Mindy D Szeto; Colby L Presley; Melissa R Laughter
Journal:  Curr Dermatol Rep       Date:  2021-09-13

Review 5.  Risks and benefits of Twitter use by hematologists/oncologists in the era of digital medicine.

Authors:  Deanna J Attai; Patricia F Anderson; Michael J Fisch; David L Graham; Matthew S Katz; Jennifer Kesselheim; Merry Jennifer Markham; Nathan A Pennell; Mina S Sedrak; Michael A Thompson; Audun Utengen; Don S Dizon
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 3.851

Review 6.  Using Social Media at National Meetings in Hematology-Optimal Use, Tips, Strategies, and Limitations.

Authors:  Aaron C Logan
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 7.  Online and Social Media Resources for Patients with MDS.

Authors:  Nour Abuhadra; Aziz Nazha
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.952

8.  Analysis of Popular Social Media Addressing Breast Augmentation, Implants, and Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Yeela Ben-Naftali; Ron Eromenko; Yoav Yechezkel Pikkel; Ori Samuel Duek; Eran D Bar Meir
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-05-10

9.  What are health-related users tweeting? A qualitative content analysis of health-related users and their messages on twitter.

Authors:  Joy L Lee; Matthew DeCamp; Mark Dredze; Margaret S Chisolm; Zackary D Berger
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 5.428

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.