Literature DB >> 23557148

Social networking in online support groups for health: how online social networking benefits patients.

Jae Eun Chung1.   

Abstract

An increasing number of online support groups (OSGs) have embraced the features of social networking. So far, little is known about how patients use and benefit from these features. By implementing the uses-and-gratifications framework, the author conducted an online survey with current users of OSGs to examine associations among motivation, use of specific features of OSG, and support outcomes. Findings suggest that OSG users make selective use of varied features depending on their needs, and that perceptions of receiving emotional and informational support are associated more with the use of some features than others. For example, those with strong motivation for social interaction use diverse features of OSG and make one-to-one connections with other users by friending. In contrast, those with strong motivation for information seeking limit their use primarily to discussion boards. Results also show that online social networking features, such as friending and sharing of personal stories on blogs, are helpful in satisfying the need for emotional support. The present study sheds light on online social networking features in the context of health-related OSGs and provides practical lessons on how to improve the capacity of OSGs to serve the needs of their users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23557148     DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2012.757396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  36 in total

1.  Does sustained participation in an online health community affect sentiment?

Authors:  Shaodian Zhang; Erin Bantum; Jason Owen; Noémie Elhadad
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2014-11-14

2.  Factors Contributing to Dropping-out in an Online Health Community: Static and Longitudinal Analyses.

Authors:  Shaodian Zhang; Noémie Elhadad
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

Review 3.  Recurrent pericarditis: still idiopathic? The pros and cons of a well-honoured term.

Authors:  Antonio Brucato; Massimo Imazio; Paul C Cremer; Yehuda Adler; Bernhard Maisch; George Lazaros; Marco Gattorno; Alida L P Caforio; Renzo Marcolongo; Giacomo Emmi; Alberto Martini; Allan L Klein
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  Investigating Patterns of Participation in an Online Support Group for Problem Drinking: a Social Network Analysis.

Authors:  Karen Urbanoski; Trevor van Mierlo; John Cunningham
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2017-10

5.  Factors influencing engagement in an online support group for family caregivers of individuals with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Karla T Washington; Debra Parker Oliver; Jacquelyn J Benson; Abigail J Rolbiecki; Lucas A Jorgensen; Dulce M Cruz-Oliver; George Demiris
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2019-11-06

6.  Sentiment Analysis of an Online Breast Cancer Support Group: Communicating about Tamoxifen.

Authors:  Mark L Cabling; Jeanine W Turner; Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza; Yihong Zhang; Xinyang Jiang; Fabrizio Drago; Vanessa B Sheppard
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2017-07-05

7.  Improving cancer survivors' e-health literacy via online health communities (OHCs): a social support perspective.

Authors:  Junjie Zhou; Changyu Wang
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 4.442

8.  Online discussion effects on intention to participate in genetic research: A longitudinal experimental study.

Authors:  Sojung Claire Kim; Joseph N Cappella; Vincent Price
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2016-04-06

9.  The future of mental health care: peer-to-peer support and social media.

Authors:  J A Naslund; K A Aschbrenner; L A Marsch; S J Bartels
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 6.892

Review 10.  Risks and benefits of Twitter use by hematologists/oncologists in the era of digital medicine.

Authors:  Deanna J Attai; Patricia F Anderson; Michael J Fisch; David L Graham; Matthew S Katz; Jennifer Kesselheim; Merry Jennifer Markham; Nathan A Pennell; Mina S Sedrak; Michael A Thompson; Audun Utengen; Don S Dizon
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 3.851

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.