Literature DB >> 25130687

The social media revolution is changing the conference experience: analytics and trends from eight international meetings.

Sarah E Wilkinson1, Marnique Y Basto, Greta Perovic, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Declan G Murphy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the use of Twitter at urology conferences to enhance the social media conference experience.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively registered the hashtags of eight international urology conferences taking place in 2013, using the social media metrics website, Symplur.com. In addition, we prospectively registered the hashtag for the European Association of Urology (EAU) Annual Congress for 3 consecutive years (2012-2014) to analyse the trend in the use of Twitter at a particular meeting. Metrics including number of 'tweets', number of participants, tweet traffic per day, and overall digital impressions, which were captured for 5 days before each conference, the conference itself, and the following 2 days. We also measured corresponding social media activity at a very large non-urology meeting (the American Society of Clinical Oncology) for comparative purposes.
RESULTS: Twitter activity was noted at all eight conferences in 2013. In all, 12,363 tweets were sent generating over 14 million impressions. The number of participants tweeting at each meeting varied from 80 (Congress of the Société Internationale d'Urologie, #SIU2013) to 573 (the American Urological Association, #AUA13). Overall, the AUA meeting (#AUA13) generated the most Twitter activity with >8.6 million impressions and a total of 4663 tweets over the peri-conference period. It also had the most impressions and tweets per day over this period, at 717,000 and 389, respectively. The EAU Annual Congress 2013 (#EAU13) generated 1.74 million impressions from a total of 1762 tweets from 236 participants. For trends in Twitter use, there was a very sharp rise in Twitter activity at the EAU Annual Congress between 2012 and 2014. Over this 3-year period, the number of participants increased almost 10-fold, leading to an increase in the number of tweets from 347 to almost 6000. At #EAU14, digital impressions reached 7.35 million with 5903 tweets sent by 797 participants.
CONCLUSIONS: Urological conferences, to a varying extent, have adopted social media as a means of amplifying the conference experience to a wider audience, generating international engagement and global reach. Twitter is a very powerful tool that amplifies the content of scientific meetings, and conference organisers should put in place strategies to capitalise on this.
© 2014 The Authors. BJU International © 2014 BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Symplur; analytics; conference; social media; twitter; urology

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25130687     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  48 in total

1.  Novel survey disseminated through Twitter supports its utility for networking, disseminating research, advocacy, clinical practice and other professional goals.

Authors:  Hendrik Borgmann; Sasha DeWitt; Igor Tsaur; Axel Haferkamp; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Tweeting the Meeting.

Authors:  Michael T Tanoue; Dhananjay Chatterjee; Heajung L Nguyen; Troy Sekimura; Brian H West; David Elashoff; William H Suh; Janet K Han
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2018-11

3.  [Benefits and risks of Twitter use for urologists].

Authors:  H Borgmann; P Paffenholz; T Nestler; J Salem
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Social Media and Scientific Meetings: An Analysis of Twitter Use at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Neuroradiology.

Authors:  A Radmanesh; A L Kotsenas
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Using e-technologies in clinical trials.

Authors:  Carmen Rosa; Aimee N C Campbell; Gloria M Miele; Meg Brunner; Erin L Winstanley
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Twitter expands the reach and engagement of a national scientific meeting: the Irish Society of Urology.

Authors:  G J Nason; F O'Kelly; D Bouchier-Hayes; D M Quinlan; R P Manecksha
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  How Twitter has connected the colorectal community.

Authors:  H J Logghe; G Pellino; R Brady; A S McCoubrey; S Atallah
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 8.  Integrating Social Media into Urologic Health care: What Can We Learn from Other Disciplines?

Authors:  Johannes Salem; Hendrik Borgmann; Declan G Murphy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Analysis of the Use and Impact of Twitter During American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meetings From 2011 to 2016: Focus on Advanced Metrics and User Trends.

Authors:  Naveen Pemmaraju; Michael A Thompson; Ruben A Mesa; Tejas Desai
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.840

10.  Qualitative Twitter analysis of participants, tweet strategies, and tweet content at a major urologic conference.

Authors:  Hendrik Borgmann; Jan-Henning Woelm; Axel Merseburger; Tim Nestler; Johannes Salem; Maximilian P Brandt; Axel Haferkamp; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.