| Literature DB >> 29143760 |
Amina Rhouati1,2, Gonca Bulbul3, Usman Latif4, Akhtar Hayat5, Zhan-Hong Li6, Jean Louis Marty7.
Abstract
Recent years have witnessed an overwhelming integration of nanomaterials in the fabrication of biosensors. Nanomaterials have been incorporated with the objective to achieve better analytical figures of merit in terms of limit of detection, linear range, assays stability, low production cost, etc. Nanomaterials can act as immobilization support, signal amplifier, mediator and artificial enzyme label in the construction of aptasensors. We aim in this work to review the recent progress in mycotoxin analysis. This review emphasizes on the function of the different nanomaterials in aptasensors architecture. We subsequently relate their features to the analytical performance of the given aptasensor towards mycotoxins monitoring. In the same context, a critically analysis and level of success for each nano-aptasensing design will be discussed. Finally, current challenges in nano-aptasensing design for mycotoxin analysis will be highlighted.Entities:
Keywords: aptamer; food analysis; gold/silver nanoparticles; metal oxides; mycotoxins; nanomaterials
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29143760 PMCID: PMC5705964 DOI: 10.3390/toxins9110349
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the non-enzymatic nanocatalyst based electrochemical aptasensor concept involving the use of a nCe tag and GO for Ochratoxin A detection corn sample, reproduced with permission from [67]. Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry, 2015.
Figure 2TiO2 quenching based sensing platform for OTA molecule detection: (a) in the absence of target analyte, adsorption of FAM-labeled aptamer on TiO2 surface led fluorescence quenching; and (b) in the presence of target analyte, the anti-parallel G-quadruplex structure form decrease adsorption and fluorescence recovered [102].
Figure 3Schematic illustration of the aptasensor based on shielding effect-induced FRET inhibition for OTA detection, reproduced with permission from [55]. Copyright Elsevier, 2016.
Nanomaterial-assisted aptasensors for OTA determination.
| Nanomaterial | Nanomaterial Role | Limit of Detection (µg/L) | Real Sample | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AuNPs | Colorimetric probe | 8.07 | ------ | [ |
| Colorimetric probe | 0.02 | Red wine | [ | |
| LSPR probe | 0.4 | Ground corn samples | [ | |
| FRET quencher | 1.4 × 10−3 | Wheat and green coffee beans | [ | |
| AuNPs and silica NPs | Fluorescence quencher | 0.039 | Grape juice and serum | [ |
| Signal amplifier | 0.0003 | Red wine | [ | |
| AuNPs-rGo | Signal amplifier | 0.0003 | Red wine | [ |
| AuNPs-MoS2 | Immobilization | 0.00003 | Wine | [ |
| AgNPs | Immobilization | 0.02 | Beer | [ |
| AgNPs | Signal generating probe | 0.02 | ----- | [ |
| AgNCs | Fluorophore | 0.002 | Wheat | [ |
| QDs | Fluorescent probe | 1.9 | Wine | [ |
| NGQDs@SiO2 NPs | ECL and Fluorescent probe | 0.0005 | Peanut | [ |
| Graphene quantum dots and nanoceria | FRET probe | 0.0025 | Peanut | [ |
| Thick shell QDs | FERT probe | 0.5 | Beer | [ |
| mSiO2@Au | Signal amplifier | 0.00007 | ------ | [ |
| QDs and MoS2 | Fluorescent probe and quencher | 1 | Red wine | [ |
| Nanoceria | Redox probe | 0.06 | Milk | [ |
| SWCNTs | Fluorescence quencher | 9.72 | Beer | [ |
| SWCNTs | Signal amplifier | 0.02 | Serum and grape juice | [ |
| Nanographite | Fluorescence quencher | 8.07 | Red wine | [ |
| Fluorescent NPs | Fluorescence probe | 0.002 | Beer | [ |
Figure 4Fluorescent Assay methods for the detection of AFB1 based on DNA aptamer and GO, reproduced with permission from [136]. Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry, 2010.
Nanomaterial-assisted aptasensors for aflatoxins, zearalenone and fumonisin B1 determination.
| Aflatoxin | Nanomaterial | Role of the Nanomaterial | LOD (µg/L) | Real Sample | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFB1 | AuNPs | Colorimetric probe | 0.025 | ------ | [ |
| AFB2 | Colorimetric probe | 0.025 | Beer | [ | |
| AFB1 | Colorimetric probe | 2.18 | Peanut and rice | [ | |
| HRP-mimicking activity | 0.15 | Peanut and rice | [ | ||
| Fluorescence quencher | 0.005 | Corn | [ | ||
| cDNA carrier | 6 × 10−11 | Corn | [ | ||
| Ag core and Au shell NPs | SERS signal enhancer | 0.03 | Maize | [ | |
| GNTs/Ag core–shell | SERS signal enhancer | 0.00054 | Peanut oil | [ | |
| AgNCs | Fluorescent signal enhancer | 0.0003 | Rice, corn and wheat | [ | |
| Graphene oxide NPs | Signal amplification | 0.35 | Corn | [ | |
| QDs/Graphene oxide NPs | Fluorescence probe/Quencher | 0.31 | Peanut oil | [ | |
| ZEN | UPCNPs | Florescent probe | 0.007 | Beer | [ |
| Functional graphene oxide | Fluorescence quencher | 0.5 | Wine and beer | [ | |
| FB1 | UPCNPs and AuNPs | FRET probe | 0.01 | Maize | [ |
Figure 5Schematic illustration of the fluorescence resonance energy transfer between NaYF4: Yb, Ho UCNPs and AuNPs based on molecular beacons for fumonisin B 1 sensing, reproduced with permission from [139]. Copyright Elsevier, 2013.