| Literature DB >> 26402704 |
Atul Sharma1,2, Akhtar Hayat3,4, Rupesh K Mishra5,6, Gaëlle Catanante7, Sunil Bhand2, Jean Louis Marty8.
Abstract
We demonstrate for the first time, the development of titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO₂) quenching based aptasensing platform for detection of target molecules. TiO₂ quench the fluorescence of FAM-labeled aptamer (fluorescein labeled aptamer) upon the non-covalent adsorption of fluorescent labeled aptamer on TiO₂ surface. When OTA interacts with the aptamer, it induced aptamer G-quadruplex complex formation, weakens the interaction between FAM-labeled aptamer and TiO₂, resulting in fluorescence recovery. As a proof of concept, an assay was employed for detection of Ochratoxin A (OTA). At optimized experimental condition, the obtained limit of detection (LOD) was 1.5 nM with a good linearity in the range 1.5 nM to 1.0 µM for OTA. The obtained results showed the high selectivity of assay towards OTA without interference to structurally similar analogue Ochratoxin B (OTB). The developed aptamer assay was evaluated for detection of OTA in beer sample and recoveries were recorded in the range from 94.30%-99.20%. Analytical figures of the merits of the developed aptasensing platform confirmed its applicability to real samples analysis. However, this is a generic aptasensing platform and can be extended for detection of other toxins or target analyte.Entities:
Keywords: aptamer assay; beer; fluorescently labeled aptamer; ochratoxin A; quenching; titanium dioxide nanoparticles
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26402704 PMCID: PMC4591649 DOI: 10.3390/toxins7093771
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Comparison with earlier reported aptamer assay for OTA detection.
| S. No. | Materials | Methods | Linear range | LOD | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Single walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) | Fluorescence | 25–200 nM | 24.1 nM | [ |
| 2. | Graphene oxide: Bare grapheme PVP coated graphene oxide | Fluorescence | 2–35 µM 50–500 nM | 1.9 µM 21.8 nM | [ |
| 3. | Nanographite: Bare nanographite DNase catalyzed amplification | Fluorescence | 2–50 µM 0.02–0.4 µM | 2 µM 20 nM | [ |
| 4. | Terbium (Tb3+) | Fluorescence | 0.1–1 ng/mL | 20 pg/mL | [ |
| 5. | Molecular beacons | Fluorescence | 1–100 ng/mL | 0.8 ng/mL | [ |
| 6. | Gold nanoparticles | Colorimetric | 20–625 nM | 20 nM | [ |
| 7. | Titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2) | Fluorescence | 1.5 nM–1 µM | 1.5 nM | Present work |
Figure 1Schematic representation of TiO2 quenching based sensing platform for target molecule detection. (a) In the absence of target analyte, adsorption of FAM-labeled aptamer on TiO2 surface led fluorescence quenching; (b) In the presence of target analyte, the anti-parallel G-quadruplex structure form decrease adsorption and fluorescence recovered.
Figure 2(A) UV absorption spectra of (a) TiO2; (b) Aptamer; (c) Aptamer-target complex (in absence of TiO2); (d) Aptamer-target complex (in presence of TiO2); and (e) Aptamer-TiO2 complex; (B) Fluorescence imaging of (i) FAM-aptamer; (ii) aptamer-TiO2; and (iii) aptamer-target complex (in presence of TiO2).
Figure 3(a) Quenching effect of TiO2 on fluorescence intensity of FAM-labeled aptamer (final concentration 2.0 µM) in HBB at pH 7.4; (b) Effect of HBB and PBB at pH 7.4 on quenching performance of TiO2 (final concentration, 150 µg/mL). The error bars were obtained from three parallel experiments.
Figure 4(a) Effect of pH (6.8–8.2) in HBB on quenching performance of TiO2; (b) Effect of NaCl concentrations (30, 60, 90 and 120 mM) on quenching performance of TiO2; (c) Effect of CaCl2 concentrations (1, 5, 10, 20 and 30 mM) on quenching performance of TiO2; (d) Effect of MgCl2 concentrations (1, 2.5 and 5 mM) on quenching performance of TiO2. The error bars were obtained from three parallel measurements.
Figure 5(a) Calibration graph for OTA analysis in HBB, pH 7.4 showing recovered fluorescence intensity percentage against OTA concentration. Inset showing the linear fit graph; (b) Bar graph representation of specificity studies of aptamer with OTB. Error bars were obtained from three parallel experiments.
Analytical and recovery performance of developed assay for detection of OTA.
| Interday Analysis Performance of Fluorescence Aptamer Assay | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days | OTA (μM) | Recovered FL Intensity (a.u.) | Mean ± S.D. | % R.S.D. | |
| Day-1 | 0.25 | 17.78 | 17.78 ± 0.31 | 1.74 | |
| Day-2 | 0.25 | 16.76 | 16.76 ± 1.09 | 6.50 | |
| Day-3 | 0.25 | 17.67 | 17.67 ± 0.62 | 3.51 | |
|
| |||||
| 0.25 | 17.78 | 17.02 | 18 | 17.6 ± 0.51 | 2.89 |
| 0.0031 | 0.0029 | 0.0029 ± 0.0001 | 3.44 | 94.30 | |
| 0.2500 | 0.2480 | 0.2480 ± 0.0030 | 1.21 | 99.20 | |
| 1.0000 | 0.9910 | 0.9910 ± 0.0100 | 1.00 | 99.10 | |