| Literature DB >> 35696147 |
Yue He1, Cong-Ying Wen2, Zhi-Jun Guo3, Yu-Fen Huang4,5.
Abstract
Microbial toxins generated by bacteria, fungi and algae cause serious food-safety problems due to the frequent contamination of foodstuffs and their poisonous nature. Becoming acquainted with the contamination condition of foodstuffs is highly dependent on developing sensitive, specific, and accurate methods for targeting microbial toxins. Aptamers, obtained from systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX), have significant advantages for microbial toxin analysis, such as small size, reproducible chemical synthesis, and modification, as well as high binding affinity, specificity, and stability. Besides, aptamers have a predictable structure and can be tailored using biomolecular tools (e.g., ligase, endonuclease, exonuclease, polymerase, and so on), which is conducive to the development of flexible and variable amplification methods. Recent studies revealed that the combination of aptamers and noble metal nanomaterials offers unprecedented opportunities for microbial toxin detection. Noble metal nanomaterials with outstanding physical and chemical properties facilitate the detection process and improve the sensitivity and specificity. In this review, we discuss current progress in the development of various noble metal nanomaterial-based aptasensors for microbial toxin detection. These noble metal nanomaterials include gold nanoparticles, gold nanorods, gold nanoclusters, silver nanoparticles, silver nanoclusters, and bimetallic nanomaterials. Aptasensors based on noble metal nanomaterials exhibiting high selectivity and sensitivity represent a promising tool for microbial toxin detection.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35696147 PMCID: PMC9261816 DOI: 10.38212/2224-6614.1155
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Food Drug Anal Impact factor: 6.157
Noble metal nanomaterial-based aptasensors for microbial toxin detection.
| Nanomaterials | Method | Target | Strategy | LOD | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AuNPs | Colorimetric | OTA | Target-induced aggregation of AuNPs | 20 nM | [ |
| Colorimetric | SEB | Target-induced aggregation of AuNPs | 10 ng/mL | [ | |
| Colorimetric | AFB1 | Target-induced aggregation of AuNPs | 0.025 ng/mL | [ | |
| Colorimetric | ZEN | Target-induced aggregation of AuNPs | 12.5 nM | [ | |
| Colorimetric | MC-LR | Target-induced aggregation of AuNPs | 0.37 nM | [ | |
| Colorimetric | MC-LR | Target-induced disassembly of AuNPs | 0.05 nM | [ | |
| Colorimetric | OTA | Enzyme-induced aggregation of AuNPs | 5.0 nM | [ | |
| Colorimetric | AFB1 | Catalytic DNA circuit amplification strategy | 10 pM | [ | |
| Colorimetric | SEB | Target-regulated growth of AuNPs | 1 pg/mL | [ | |
| Colorimetric | OTA | Target-regulated growth of AuNPs | 1 nM | [ | |
| Lateral Flow Test Strip | OTA | Competition between OTA and cDNA with aptamer | 1 ng/mL | [ | |
| Lateral Flow Test Strip | ZEN | Competition between ZEN and cDNA with aptamer | 20 ng/mL | [ | |
| Fluorescent method | OTA | FRET between FAM-aptamer and AuNP | 5 nM | [ | |
| Electrochemical | CDTA | Electrode was modifed AuNPs-capture DNA; aptamer-HRP was used to amplify the detection signal | 1 nM | [ | |
| Electrochemical | SEB | Electrode was modifed AuNPs, ZrO2NPs, chitosan, and capture DNA; H2O2 was used as the substrate of probe DNA-HRP | 0.24 ng/mL | [ | |
| Electrochemical | FB1 | SPCE was covered by PDMS and AuNPs | 3.4 pg/mL | [ | |
| Electrochemical | PAT | Electrode was modifed with ZnO nanorods, AuNPs, and aptamer | 0.27 pg/mL | [ | |
| Electrochemical | AFM1 | AFM1-mediated AuNPs close proximity to SPGE | 0.9 ng/mL | [ | |
| Electrochemical | OTA | Capture DNA, aptamer, reporter DNA-AuNP were immobilized on electrode; methylene blue was used as a redox indicator | 0.75 pM | [ | |
| Electrochemical | AFB1 | Telomerase and EXO III based signal amplification strategy | 0.6 × 10−4 pg/mL | [ | |
| AuNRs | LSPR-based portable method | OTA | Aptamer-labeled AuNRs were coated on the optical fiber; aptamer-OTA binding events caused the LSPR peak of AuNR red shift. | 12 pM | [ |
| Multicolor colorimetric method | OTA | G-quadruplex-hemin DNAzyme-mediated etching of AuNRs | 30 nM | [ | |
| Multicolor colorimetric method | OTA | ALP-mediated metalization of AuNRs | 9 nM | [ | |
| SERS | SEB | Aptamer modified on the MNPs to capture SEB from the food matrix; Raman reporter and aptamer immobilized AuNRs form a sandwich-like detection model | 2.2 × 10−16 M | [ | |
| Electrochemical | OTA | AuNRs modified-Au electrode; DNA tetrahedral nanostructures | 0.26 pg/mL | [ | |
| AuNCs | Fluorometric | AFB1 and ZEN | FRET between dual-color AuNCs and WS2 nanosheets | AFB1: 0.34 pg/mL; ZEN: 0.53 pg/mL | [ |
| AgNPs | Fluorometric | AFB1 | FRET between fluorescent polymer dots and AgNPs | 0.3 pg/mL | [ |
| SERS | OTA | Target-mediated Raman reporter Cy5 labelled aptamer desorption from the surface of AgNPs | 0.1 nM | [ | |
| Electrochemical | OTA | Gold electrode covered with neutral red and aptamer-AgNPs | 0.05 nM | [ | |
| Electrochemical | OTA | Aptamer was immodibized on the gold electrode; AgNPs/PDANSs were used as electrochemical tracer | 0.57 pM | [ | |
| AgNCs | Fluorometric | SEA | FRET between AgNCs and PPNPs | 0.3393 ng/mL | [ |
| Fluorometric | T-2 toxin | FRET between AgNCs and MoS2 | 0.93 pg/mL | [ | |
| Fluorometric | OTA and AFB1 | Magnetic separation and DNA-template AgNCs as the fluorophore | OTA: 0.2 pg/mL; AFB1: 0.3 pg/mL | [ | |
| Electrochemical | OTA | Aptamer was modified on the surface of SPGE; AgNCs metallization on OTA/aptamer complex | 0.7 pg/mL | [ | |
| Bimetallic nanomaterials | SERS | AFB1 | AuNS core–AgNP satellites | 0.48 pg/mL | [ |
| SERS | MC-LR | AuNF core–AgNP satellites | 8.6 ± 0.4 pM | [ | |
| SERS | AFB1 | MNPs-aptamer-cDNA-AuNTs/Ag as the probe | 0.54 pg/mL | [ | |
| SERS | OTA | MNPs-aptamer-cDNA-Au@Au–Ag as the probe | 0.004 ng/mL | [ | |
| Electrochemical | ZEN | Cu@L-Glu/Pd-PtNPs as the signal tag | 0.45 fg/mL | [ | |
| Electrochemical | T-2 toxin | rGO-TEPA-Au@PtNRs as the signal tag | 1.79 fg/mL | [ |
Fig. 1(A) Schematic representation of a colorimetric aptasensor based on unmodified AuNPs for OTA detection. Adapted with permission from Ref. [6]. Copyright Elsevier, 2011. (B) Schematic representation of a fluorescent aptasensor based on AuNPs for OTA detection. Adapted with permission from Ref. [17]. Copyright Elsevier, 2018. (C) Schematic representation of an electrochemical aptasensor based on AuNPs for CDTA detection. Adapted with permission from Ref. [18]. Copyright Elsevier, 2014.
Fig. 2(A) Schematic representation of an optical fibers based on AuNRs for OTA detection. Adapted with permission from Ref. [25]. Copyright Elsevier, 2018. (B) Schematic representation of enzyme-mediated metallization of AuNRs for multicolor colorimetric detection of OTA. Adapted with permission from Ref. [27]. Copyright Elsevier, 2020. (C) Schematic representation of a SERS aptasensor based on AuNRs for homogeneous sandwich detection of SEB. Adapted with permission from Ref. [28]. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2012. (D) Schematic of a DNA tetrahedral nanostructure-based aptasensor for OTA detection. Adapted with permission from Ref. [29]. Copyright Elsevier, 2018.
Fig. 3Schematic representation of an aptasensor based on AgNCs for the simultaneous detection of OTA and AFB1. Adapted with permission from Ref. [41]. Copyright Elsevier, 2016.
Fig. 4Scheme of a SERS aptasensor based on AuNS core–AgNP satellites for the detection of AFB1. Adapted with permission from Ref. [44]. Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry, 2016.