| Literature DB >> 29085002 |
Hasinika K A H Gamage1, Sasha G Tetu2, Raymond W W Chong1, John Ashton3, Nicolle H Packer1, Ian T Paulsen4.
Abstract
The introduction of different nutrient and energy sources during weaning leads to significant changes in the infant gut microbiota. We used an in vitro infant digestive and gut microbiota model system to investigate the effect of four commercially available cereal products based on either wheat, sorghum, rice or oats, on the gut microbiota of six infants. Our results indicated cereal additions induced numerous changes in the gut microbiota composition. The relative abundance of bacterial families associated with fibre degradation, Bacteroidaceae, Bifidobacteriaceae, Lactobacillaceae, Prevotellaceae, Ruminococcaceae and Veillonellaceae increased, whilst the abundance of Enterobacteriaceae decreased with cereal additions. Corresponding changes in the production of SCFAs showed higher concentrations of acetate following all cereal additions, whilst, propionate and butyrate varied between specific cereal additions. These cereal-specific variations in the concentrations of SCFAs showed a moderate correlation with the relative abundance of potential SCFA-producing bacterial families. Overall, our results demonstrated clear shifts in the abundance of bacterial groups associated with weaning and an increase in the production of SCFAs following cereal additions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29085002 PMCID: PMC5662621 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14707-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Metadata of the six biological samples (Sample 1–6). None of the infants were given antibiotics in at least three months prior to fecal sample submission. *Egg and spinach allergies.
| Biological sample | Age (months) | Frequency of breast feeding | Frequency of formula feeding | Types of solid food introduced | Medical conditions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample 1 | 5 | Daily | None | Fruits, vegetables, grain, cereal, meat, eggs | None |
| Sample 2 | 5 | None | Daily | Fruits, vegetables, grain, cereals | None |
| Sample 3 | 5.5 | Daily | None | Fruits, vegetables | None |
| Sample 4 | 7 | Daily | Daily | Fruits, vegetables, grain, cereals, meat, eggs, dairy | Food allergies* |
| Sample 5 | 9 | Daily | Daily | Fruits, vegetables, grain, cereals, meat, eggs, dairy | None |
| Sample 6 | 11 | None | Daily | Fruits, vegetables, grain, cereals, meat, eggs, dairy | None |
Figure 1Ordination of the gut microbiota in each biological sample (1–6) at 0, 24 and 48 hours. Data is shown as Bray-Curtis similarity of Log (X + 1) transformed relative abundance based nMDS plots. Treatments and time points are colour coded as shown in the legend. All cereal additions shifted the community structure at 24 and 48 hours (dotted line circle) compared to the samples at 0 hours (solid line circle) and no added cereal control at 24 and 48 hours (solid line square).
Figure 2Family level taxonomic compositions of the microbial communities for each biological replicate. The relative abundances of the families were determined using QIIME and GraphPad Prism (V7). Each bar is labelled first by treatment, followed by time point (0, 24 and 48 hours). No added cereal control is abbreviated as NAC. Major bacterial families are shown in different colours as indicated in the legend. Bacterial identifications that were not assigned to a family are categorised as “Unassigned”. Bacterial families that were not significantly differentially abundant comparing the treatment regimes in any of the six biological samples are categorised as “Other”. Significance (P < 0.05) was determined using a Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.
Figure 3Concentration (mmolL−1g−1) of acetate, butyrate and propionate in each treatment at 0 and 48 hours. Concentration measurements at 24 and 48 hours for all three SCFAs were similar, therefore only 48 hours are shown. Mean ± SD concentration for all treatments with each biological sample (sample 1–6) denoted by colour-coded bars. No added cereal control is abbreviated as NAC. The concentrations and results of ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test for significance are provided in Supplementary Table S4.
Figure 4The predicted relative abundance of KEGG Orthology pathways for each sample with different cereal additions inferred using PICRUSt. The heat map shows the relative abundance of KEGG Orthology pathways (rows) with significant differences between treatments at 48 hours (columns) in at least five biological replicates. Significance was determined using an ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Biological samples (Sample 1–6) were analysed independently. Blue and white represent the highest and lowest relative abundance respectively. Intensity of the colour denotes the level of the relative abundance (as shown in the legend). The inferred relative abundance of the predicted functional pathways and results of tests for significance are provided in Supplementary Table S5.