| Literature DB >> 33927231 |
Shanthi G Parkar1, Jovyn K T Frost2, Doug Rosendale2, Halina M Stoklosinski2, Carel M H Jobsis2, Duncan I Hedderley2, Pramod Gopal3,4.
Abstract
Eight plant-based foods: oat flour and pureed apple, blackcurrant, carrot, gold- and green-fleshed kiwifruit, pumpkin, sweetcorn, were pre-digested and fermented with pooled inocula of weaning infants' faecal bacteria in an in vitro hindgut model. Inulin and water were included as controls. The pre-digested foods were analysed for digestion-resistant fibre-derived sugar composition and standardised to the same total fibre concentration prior to fermentation. The food-microbiome interactions were then characterised by measuring microbial acid and gas metabolites, microbial glycosidase activity and determining microbiome structure. At the physiologically relevant time of 10 h of fermentation, the xyloglucan-rich apple and blackcurrant favoured a propiogenic metabolic and microbiome profile with no measurable gas production. Glucose-rich, xyloglucan-poor pumpkin caused the greatest increases in lactate and acetate (indicative of high fermentability) commensurate with increased bifidobacteria. Glucose-rich, xyloglucan-poor oats and sweetcorn, and arabinogalactan-rich carrot also increased lactate and acetate, and were more stimulatory of clostridial families, which are indicative of increased microbial diversity and gut and immune health. Inulin favoured a probiotic-driven consortium, while water supported a proteolytic microbiome. This study shows that the fibre-derived sugar composition of complementary foods may shape infant gut microbiome structure and metabolic activity, at least in vitro.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33927231 PMCID: PMC8085221 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88445-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Foods used for the in vitro gastro-intestinal digestion and fermentation.
| Food | Supplier |
|---|---|
| Apple puree | Frupak, Hastings, New Zealand |
| Blackcurrant puree, seedless | Juice Products New Zealand, Timaru, New Zealand |
| Carrot puree | Juice Products New Zealand, Timaru, New Zealand |
| Gold-fleshed kiwifruit puree, seed-out | Kiwifruitz, Tauranga, New Zealand |
| Green-fleshed kiwifruit puree, seed-out | Kiwifruitz, Tauranga, New Zealand |
| Oat flour | Harraway & Sons Ltd., Dunedin, New Zealand |
| Pumpkin puree | Cedenco Foods New Zealand Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand |
| Sweetcorn puree | Cedenco Foods New Zealand Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand |
Figure 1Workflow of the experimental protocol and analyses.
Neutral sugar and uronic acid composition (µg/mg) and molar ratio analysis of pectic and xyloglucan-related sugars in the digesta from foods and inulin.
| Sugar | Apple | Blackcurrant | Carrot | Gold-fleshed kiwifruit | Green-fleshed kiwifruit | Inulin | Oats | Pumpkin | Sweet corn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rhamnose | 6. ± 0.4 | 14.6 ± 0.5 | 10.1 ± 0.6 | 4.1 ± 0.1 | 4.4 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.0 | 0.4 ± 0.0 | 4.6 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.1 |
| Fucose | 3.6 ± 0.3 | 1.2 ± 0.0 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.0 | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 0.6 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.1 |
| Arabinose | 22.5 ± 1.4 | 12.3 ± 0.4 | 29.8 ± 1.1 | 6.6 ± 0.5 | 7.4 ± 0.0 | 3.5 ± 0.0 | 10.7 ± 1.9 | 9.7 ± 0.1 | 14.8 ± 0.3 |
| Xylose | 13.9 ± 1.7 | 12.2 ± 0.2 | 3.8 ± 0.1 | 11.8 ± 0.8 | 13.3 ± 0.2 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 8.9 ± 2.6 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 11.5 ± 0.2 |
| Mannose | 5.5 ± 0.1 | 4.9 ± 0.0 | 6.9 ± 0.4 | 6.8 ± 0.4 | 6.1 ± 0.1 | 5.0 ± 0.1 | 3.1 ± 0.5 | 5.2 ± 0.2 | 2.3 ± 0.1 |
| Galactose | 20.9 ± 1.1 | 17.8 ± 0.5 | 52.6 ± 2.9 | 24.1 ± 1.7 | 26.3 ± 0.2 | 17.3 ± 0.1 | 10.8 ± 0.6 | 32.5 ± 0.1 | 14.6 ± 0.2 |
| Glucose | 100.0 ± 1.2 | 94.0 ± 3.3 | 96.1 ± 8.0 | 112.3 ± 6.2 | 111.8 ± 6.9 | 62.6 ± 0.3 | 387.1 ± 14.6 | 231.0 ± 24.2 | 185.1 ± 0.6 |
| Uronic acid | 124.7 ± 11.3 | 111.2 ± 5.5 | 130.7 ± 13.6 | 96.8 ± 3.3 | 113.2 ± 4.7 | 19.7 ± 0.9 | 24.4 ± 1.7 | 70.3 ± 7.7 | 39.7 ± 2.0 |
| Total | 297.5 ± 6.2 | 268.2 ± 5.0 | 331.0 ± 12.9 | 263.6 ± 2.9 | 283.8 ± 6.8 | 110.0 ± 0.5 | 445.6 ± 19.0 | 358.5 ± 23.9 | 269.6 ± 0.5 |
| Uronic acid/rhamnose | 15.0 | 5.9 | 10.0 | 18.3 | 19.7 | 24.2 | 42.4 | 11.9 | 22.0 |
| (Arabinose + Galactose)/ Rhamnose | 6.8 | 2.0 | 8.0 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 31.1 | 48.4 | 8.8 | 21.1 |
| Xylose/Glucose | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.07 |
Values (µg/mg of the freeze-dried material) are mean of two determinations, measured in duplicate. S.E. shown.
Gas production (headspace PSI) during fermentation of substrates.
| Time (h) | Apple | Blackcurrant | Carrot | Digesta control | Gold-fleshed kiwifruit | Green-fleshed kiwifruit | Inulin | Oats | Pumpkin | Sweetcorn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.50 ± 0.25ab | 0.50 ± 0.43ab | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.75 ± 0.00b | 0.83 ± 0.29b | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.67 ± 0.14b |
| 10 | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.83 ± 0.14b | 1.67 ± 0.14c | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 1.33 ± 0.29c | 0.83 ± 0.14b | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.67 ± 0.14b |
| 16 | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 3.83 ± 0.14b | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 3.75 ± 0.25b | 0.25 ± 0.43a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.50 ± 0.43a |
| 24 | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 2.58 ± 0.14b | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 2.42 ± 0.14b | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a |
Values are mean of three replicates. S.E. shown. At each time point, the significance due to the substrate was P < 0.001. Within a time point, means with letters in common are not significantly different. Tukey’s HSD (0.05).
Figure 2Principal component analysis plot visualising the changes in the organic acids after 10 h of fermentation of the foods and the two controls, inulin and water digesta. The acids that influence the loading are appended to the plot in red.
Figure 3Principal component analysis plot (a) and the loadings plot (b) demonstrate microbial glycosidase-driven separation of foods and controls after 10 h of fermentation with infants’ faecal inocula. Each substrate was fermented in triplicate. The enzymes included α-arabinofuranidase (α-AraF), α-arabinopyranosidase (α-AraP), α-fucopyranosidase (α-FucP); α-glucopyranosidase (α-GlcP), β-glucopyranosidase (β-GlucoseP), α- and β-galactopyranosidase (β-GalP), α-N-acetylgalactosaminidase (GalNAc), β-N-acetylglucosaminidase (β-GlcNAc), α-rhamnopyranosidase (α-RhaP), α-mannopyranosidase (α-ManP) and β-xylopyranosidase (β-XylP).
Figure 4Bray–Curtis similarity index-based Principal Coordinate Analysis plot of the infant gut microbiome demonstrating the shifts in the community structure after 10 h of fermentation of the different foods in comparison to the no-carbohydrate digesta control. Each fermentation was carried out in triplicate.
Figure 5Significant changes in relative abundances in the infant faecal bacteria at the end of 10 h of fermentation. Genera/taxa with ≥ 1% relative abundance in at least one sample depicted. The significance values adjusted to the false discovery rate were P < 0.005, the likelihood ratio test was adjusted for 32 tests.
Spearman correlations between fibre-derived sugar composition of the foods and the changes in bacterial taxa at the end of 10 h of fermentation.
| Concentration | Molar percentage | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rhamnose | Glucose | Rhamnose | Fucose | Uronic acid/ Rhamnose | (Arabinose + Galactose)/ Rhamnose | Xylose/ Glucose | Organism |
| − 0.25 | − 0.42 | − 0.88 | 0.10 | 0.35 | − 0.41 | ||
| − 0.38 | 0.78 | − 0.41 | − 0.80 | 0.30 | 0.31 | − 0.22 | |
| − 0.72 | 0.18 | − 0.78 | − 0.17 | 0.72 | 0.77 | − 0.51 | |
| 0.10 | − 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.57 | − 0.10 | − 0.05 | − 0.05 | |
| − 0.03 | − 0.47 | 0.11 | 0.81 | 0.07 | − 0.03 | 0.06 | |
| − 0.13 | − 0.43 | 0.04 | 0.64 | 0.17 | − 0.01 | − 0.26 | |
| − 0.40 | 0.67 | − 0.54 | − 0.54 | 0.38 | 0.45 | − 0.21 | |
| − 0.42 | − 0.54 | − 0.69 | 0.35 | 0.46 | − 0.07 | ||
| − 0.28 | 0.53 | − 0.27 | − 0.64 | 0.25 | 0.16 | − 0.45 | |
| − 0.32 | − 0.43 | − 0.76 | 0.18 | 0.36 | − 0.37 | ||
| − 0.18 | 0.85 | − 0.38 | − | 0.05 | 0.30 | − 0.47 | |
| − 0.62 | 0.22 | − 0.75 | − 0.28 | 0.55 | 0.76 | − 0.63 | |
| 0.07 | − 0.68 | 0.17 | 0.66 | 0.05 | − 0.18 | 0.11 | |
| − 0.63 | 0.22 | − 0.72 | − 0.36 | 0.53 | 0.71 | − 0.89 | |
| − 0.45 | 0.65 | − 0.68 | − 0.50 | 0.38 | 0.64 | − 0.51 | |
| 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.17 | − 0.38 | − 0.42 | − 0.16 | − 0.05 | |
| 0.35 | − 0.88 | 0.48 | 0.82 | − 0.25 | − 0.39 | 0.24 | |
| 0.27 | − 0.53 | 0.18 | 0.29 | − 0.32 | − 0.09 | − 0.13 | |
| − 0.30 | − 0.44 | − 0.59 | 0.18 | 0.39 | − 0.20 | ||
| 0.05 | 0.50 | − 0.07 | − 0.83 | − 0.15 | − 0.03 | − 0.32 | |
| − 0.15 | 0.67 | − 0.28 | − | 0.05 | 0.19 | − 0.26 | |
| − 0.12 | − 0.48 | − 0.06 | 0.64 | 0.22 | 0.12 | 0.49 | |
| − 0.23 | 0.88 | − 0.37 | − 0.82 | 0.07 | 0.31 | − 0.41 | |
| − 0.15 | 0.78 | − 0.24 | − 0.43 | 0.07 | 0.19 | − 0.22 | |
| 0.18 | − 0.18 | 0.35 | 0.47 | − 0.02 | − 0.39 | 0.65 | |
| − | 0.32 | − | − 0.19 | − 0.52 | |||
| 0.58 | − 0.22 | 0.70 | 0.36 | − 0.47 | − 0.69 | ||
| − 0.62 | 0.62 | − 0.81 | − 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.77 | − 0.62 | |
| 0.23 | 0.10 | 0.38 | − 0.19 | − 0.28 | − 0.40 | 0.44 | |
| − 0.55 | 0.05 | − 0.59 | 0.08 | 0.55 | 0.61 | − 0.25 | |
| − 0.68 | 0.27 | − 0.81 | − 0.25 | 0.63 | 0.81 | − 0.68 | |
Only sugars with at least one correlation (r ≥ ± 0.9 shown in bold, FDR-adjusted P < 0.1, multiple hypothesis testing) are presented.