Literature DB >> 25919227

Fat, fibre and cancer risk in African Americans and rural Africans.

Stephen J D O'Keefe1, Jia V Li2, Leo Lahti3, Junhai Ou1, Franck Carbonero4, Khaled Mohammed1, Joram M Posma2, James Kinross2, Elaine Wahl1, Elizabeth Ruder5, Kishore Vipperla1, Vasudevan Naidoo6, Lungile Mtshali6, Sebastian Tims7, Philippe G B Puylaert7, James DeLany8, Alyssa Krasinskas9, Ann C Benefiel4, Hatem O Kaseb1, Keith Newton6, Jeremy K Nicholson2, Willem M de Vos10, H Rex Gaskins4, Erwin G Zoetendal7.   

Abstract

Rates of colon cancer are much higher in African Americans (65:100,000) than in rural South Africans (<5:100,000). The higher rates are associated with higher animal protein and fat, and lower fibre consumption, higher colonic secondary bile acids, lower colonic short-chain fatty acid quantities and higher mucosal proliferative biomarkers of cancer risk in otherwise healthy middle-aged volunteers. Here we investigate further the role of fat and fibre in this association. We performed 2-week food exchanges in subjects from the same populations, where African Americans were fed a high-fibre, low-fat African-style diet and rural Africans a high-fat, low-fibre western-style diet, under close supervision. In comparison with their usual diets, the food changes resulted in remarkable reciprocal changes in mucosal biomarkers of cancer risk and in aspects of the microbiota and metabolome known to affect cancer risk, best illustrated by increased saccharolytic fermentation and butyrogenesis, and suppressed secondary bile acid synthesis in the African Americans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25919227      PMCID: PMC4415091          DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


INTRODUCTION

In the west, colon cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death. It afflicts approximately 150,000 Americans, 250,000 Europeans and 1 million people worldwide annually. Nearly one third will die[1]. Colonoscopy has permitted early detection and recent studies have shown this to be associated with a reduction in mortality rates, but overall impact has been small, particularly among African Americans who shoulder the greatest burden of the disease in the USA. Colon cancer is one of the westernized diseases, with an incidence in Americans of African descent of 65:100,000 compared to <5:100,000 in rural Africans. Migrant studies, such as those in Japanese Hawaiians, have demonstrated that it only takes one generation for the immigrant population to assume the colon cancer incidence of the host western population[2]. Whilst the change in diet is most likely responsible for this[3], migration changes many other aspects of the environment. For example, cigarettes, chemicals, infections, antibiotics, might be equally responsible for the change in colon cancer risk. To focus on the importance of diet in African Americans and to explore the hypothesis that colon cancer risk is determined by the influence of the diet on the microbiota to produce anti- or pro-neoplastic metabolites, we have performed a series of investigations between African Americans and rural South Africans[4,5]. First, we observed that their diets were fundamentally different in preparation, cooking, and composition. Animal protein and fat intake was 2-3 times higher in Americans, whilst carbohydrate and fiber, chiefly in the form of resistant starch, were higher Africans. On colonoscopy, African Americans had more polyps and higher rates of mucosal proliferation, measured by Ki67 epithelial cell staining, confirming its potential use as a biomarker of cancer risk[6]. These differences were shown to be associated with profound differences in the microbiota (Americans dominated by genus Bacteroides, Africans by the genus Prevotella) and metabolic phenotype. Notable differences included higher levels of starch degraders, carbohydrate fermenters, and butyrate producers and their metabolites in Africans, and higher levels of potentially pathogenic proteobacteria (Escherichia, Acinetobacter) and bile acid deconjugators and their products in Americans[5]. As there is extensive experimental evidence that the products of fiber fermentation, in particular butyrate, are anti-inflammatory and anti-neoplastic[7-9] and that the products of bacterial bile acid conjugation, secondary bile acids, are carcinogenic[10], these findings suggested two potential mechanisms for diet-associated cancer risk: the protective effect of dietary fiber in increasing butyrogenesis, and the promotional effect of dietary fat on stimulating bile acid synthesis by the liver. We know from the results of two recently published human studies that modifications of the fiber and fat content of the diets have a major impact on the colonic microbiota within a few days[11,12]. Here we provide critical information on the functional significance of these microbiota changes on the colonic mucosa by switching the fat and fiber proportions of the diet in our two high and low colon cancer risk study populations. Employing the study design outlined on Table 1, we showed the anticipated increase in saccharolytic fermentation and butyrogenesis and suppression of secondary bile acid synthesis produced by switching African Americans to a high fiber, low fat diet for 2 weeks was associated with a significant reduction in colonic mucosal inflammation and proliferation biomarkers of cancer risk. In stark contrast, the diet switch in rural Africans to a high fat low fiber diet resulted in reverse changes in all these parameters.
Table 1

Study design, time schedule and sampling

ED 1 and ED 2 are the initial and final endoscopy days, HE is the home environment and DI is dietary intervention periods. The Xs corresponding to dietary evaluation indicate the frequency of dietary recordings; three days during the home environment when consuming their usual diets, and daily during the dietary intervention.

Day0714152229

HOME ENVIRONMENT (HE) STUDY

DIETARY INTERVENTION (DI)
at homein-house
PeriodED 1HE 1HE 2DI 1DI 2ED 2
Faecal SamplesXXXXXX
Colonic evacuatesXX
Breath H2, CH4XXXXXX
BloodsXX
Mucosal biopsiesXX
Dietary observationsXXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Results

Changes in the colonic mucosa following diet switch

Measurements made in the home environment confirmed our preceding studies that the dietary intakes were quite different, with animal protein and fat intake being 2-3 times higher in Americans, and fiber intake, chiefly in the form of resistant starch, being higher in Africans[4] (). On colonoscopy, adenomatous polyps were found and removed in nine Americans and no Africans. Measurements of mucosal epithelial proliferation rates by Ki67 staining of biopsies from ascending, transverse and descending colon all showed significantly higher levels in African Americans than Africans (), again supporting its use as a biomarker of cancer risk. The dietary switch was well tolerated by both populations and body weights were all maintained with 2Kg. Remarkably, the switch decreased proliferative rates in African Americans to levels lower than those of Africans at baseline, whilst rates increased in Africans to levels greater than African Americans at baseline (). In tandem, histological ( and immunohistochemical markers of inflammation () used, namely CD3+ intraepithelial lymphocytes and CD68+ lamina propria macrophages, increased on switching Africans to the high fat diet, and decreased in Americans given the high fiber diet, thus paralleling the measured changes in mucosal proliferation.

Changes In Colonic Microbial Metabolism Following Diet Switch

The reciprocal changes in mucosal proliferation and inflammation between Africans and Americans were associated with reciprocal changes in specific microbes and their metabolites that support our hypothesis that the mechanism whereby diet affects colon cancer risk is mediated by the microbiota. First, there was strong evidence that butyrogenesis was associated with lower mucosal proliferation, both in Africans consuming their usual high fiber diet and in African Americans switched to a high fiber African style diet (. Because a wide variety of microbes have the capacity to produce butyrate, we targeted our analysis on the measurement of microbial genes encoding the final enzyme in butyrogenesis, namely butyryl-coenzyme-A-CoA transferase[13]. On their usual diet, Africans had significantly greater abundances of butyrate synthesizing genes, and higher fecal butyrate concentrations ( and colonic evacuate quantities (, whilst switching them to a western low fiber diet suppressed each of these parameters. Reciprocally, our measurements of butyrogenesis were lower in Americans consuming their usual low fiber diet and increased after dietary switch to a high fiber African style diet. Impressively, ‘Africanization’ of the diet increased total quantities of butyrate in colonic evacuates 2.5 times whilst ‘westernization’ reduced quantities by half. Recognizing that butyrogenesis is a final common pathway of accomplished by multiple microbial metabolic interactions fiber fermentation, which can only be, we examined the simultaneous changes in the group of microbes that remove the major metabolic end-product, hydrogen. If hydrogen is allowed to accumulate, it impairs the regeneration of oxidized pyridine nucleotides, which in turn inhibit the fermentation process and butyrogenesis[14]. The efficient removal of hydrogen by the hydrogenotrophic microbes, methanogens which bind hydrogen into non-toxic methane, sulfate-reducers which incorporate hydrogen into hydrogen sulfide, and acetogens which consume hydrogen to produce acetate and water, is therefore a prerequisite for enhanced butyrogenesis. Our observation that all these microbial groups were indeed in greater abundance, as were their metabolic products, both in Africans consuming their usual high fiber diet and when Americans were switched to the high fiber diet ( well illustrates the importance of microbial partnership in the maintenance of colonic health. Flint's group has provided strong evidence that the most active butyrate producers, e.g. Roseburia spp. and Eubacterium rectale and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii are contained within Clostridium groups IV and XIVa[15]. Since Africans and African Americans have very distinct microbiota composition at baseline (), we performed a global analysis of the microbiota by 16S rRNA gene phylogenetic microarray (Human Intestinal Tract Chip (HITChip)) to examine whether these groups were more prevalent with high fiber consumption[16]. Remarkably, these groups were no more apparent in Africans or Americans eating a high fiber diet. In fact, the compositional changes that were specifically associated to the diet switch were minor (ten genus-like groups for Africans and two for Americans; ). These observations suggest either dissociation between structure and function or a change in microbial interactions within the community[17]. On the other hand, we observed stronger cooccurrence patterns between the genus-level taxa in Africans consuming their usual high fiber diet (), which included these potential butyrate producers, for example Eubacterium rectale et rel. and Clostridium symbiosum et rel., and bacteria associated with complex carbohydrate utilization, for example Oscillospira guillermondii et rel. Reduction in fiber consumption led to opposite associations (). Reciprocally, high fiber feeding in Americans was associated with a shift from correlations between Bacteroides and potential butyrate-producing groups (Roseburia intestinalis et rel. and Clostridium symbiosum et rel.) towards stronger co-occurrence patterns including Firmicutes that are typically associated with complex carbohydrate fermentation ().

Global Changes in the Metabonome following Diet Switch

We have described metabonomics and the associated term, metabolomics, as the multiparametric metabolic responses of complex systems to perturbations through time[18]. Specifically metabonomics addresses such phenotypic changes at the level of small molecule metabolites, and maps these processes using appropriate analytical and statistical processes. Recognizing the extreme complexity of the microbiota and its ability to produce a wide array of other metabolites that could affect mucosal health, we performed compositional and pathway analysis[19] on fecal water and urine samples by 1H NMR (). Perhaps one of the most striking findings of this study was the dramatically higher quantities and diversity of metabolites in fecal water in Africans consuming their usual diet compared to African Americans (. Whilst the higher levels of products of saccharolytic fermentation were expected from our targeted analysis, the higher quantities of proteolytic fermentation products were not. The only significantly more abundant fecal metabolite identified in the Americans at baseline, and in Africans after westernization of their diets, was choline. This is highly significant as recent studies have shown that choline is extensively metabolized by the microbiota to trimethylamine[20] which is absorbed and metabolized by the liver to trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) which is strongly atherogenic[21], providing yet another link between westernized diets, the microbiota, and westernized diseases. Evidence that this metabolic pathway was indeed stimulated in Africans given the western diet was the observed increase in urine TMA-O (). Reciprocal changes in urinary metabolites derived from microbial metabolism of green vegetables, e.g. N-acetyl-S-methyl-L-cysteine sulfoxide, were also observed following diet switch, suggesting that some of reduction in mucosal proliferation in Americans could also have been related to the effects of increased phytochemical consumption in the Africanized diets[22]. The urinary spectra obtained from African Americans following the change to a high fiber diet also revealed a marked increase in an unrecoginized metabolite ( possibly a nicotinamide breakdown product, whose character and function have yet to be determined. The dietary intervention caused, in tandem with the microbiota changes, substantial modifications in the metabolic phenotypes of both groups (, with Africans demonstrating less metabolic variation and Americans becoming more diverse. This is probably best appreciated from the metabolic pathway analysis ( of stool and urine samples from both groups, with color coding identifying the significant baseline differences, based on integration of the enzymes of bacterial groups identified by HITChip microarray[16], host metabolic enzymes, and fecal and urinary metabolites by 1H NMR associated with reactions from the KEGG database. The lower two panels illustrate the significant shifts in metabolic pathways identified in fecal samples after dietary switch, showing mirror image changes reflecting the above, most notably involving reductions in short chain fatty acids and increases in glycosylated proteins and choline metabolism in Africans, and the unexpected increases in amino acid metabolism in Americans. Consistent with the results of our targeted analyses, the effects on saccharolytic fermentation were reciprocal, with increases in acetate and lactate in Americans and reductions in Africans. Unlike the results obtained from targeted gas chromatography shown of , the increases in butyrate and propionate measured by global NMR did not achieve statistical significance probably because the method is more qualitative than quantitative. Again, contrary to expectation faecal concentrations of colonic branched-chain amino acids, which are likely to be derived from proteolytic fermentation, decreased in Africans given the high protein western diet for unclear reasons.

Global Microbe-Metabolite Associations

To investigate this, we performed a partial correlation analysis between genus level microbes and urine and fecal metabolites (), adjusted for nationality and diet. Although we cannot biologically explain all associations (for example, propionate correlates with enterobacteriaceae and Streptococcus which are not known to produce propionate) one striking feature was that the metabolite butyrate was exclusively associated with microbial groups that are known to contain butyrate producers, well exemplified by Roseburia intestinalis et rel, Eubacterium rectale et rel, and Clostridium symbiosum et rel which are shown in the co-occurrence networks on to be enhanced when high fibre diets were consumed by both population groups.

High Fat, Low Fiber Diets and Toxic Microbial Metabolites

It is unlikely that butyrogenesis can alone explain diet-associated cancer risk. Our preceding studies had shown that the higher fat diet of African Americans was associated a greater abundance of fecal microbial genes that encode for one of the key enzymes responsible for deconjugation of bile acids (the baiCD gene encodes for the 7-alpha-dehydroxylating enzyme[23]), as well as their metabolic products, secondary bile acids[5]. Secondary bile acids have been shown to be carcinogenic in experimental models and multiple human studies have shown that their fecal levels are associated with cancer risk[10,24,25]. Furthermore, there is substantial experimental evidence that the carcinogenic potential of these metabolites is potentiated by colonic butyrate deficiency[26-29]. Once again, we show that there were reciprocal changes in both baiCD gene abundance and the secondary bile acids, lithocholic and deoxcholic acid, after diet switch, with levels increasing in Africans given the high fat western style diet and reductions in Americans fed the low fat traditional African diet ( Whilst the use of these functional genes may not cover all the enzymatic pathways of interest, they do provide legitimate tracers for them[30]. Remarkably, Africanization reduced colonic evacuate secondary bile acids by 70%, and westernization increased them by 400% (. Dietary fat may influence colon cancer risk through other pathways as illustrated by a recent study in an Il10−/− mouse model which showed that a high-fat diet cultivated an increase in the abundance of Biophila wadsworthia, a member of the Desulfovibrionaceae family which generates hydrogen sulfide via taurine respiration, leading to acute inflammation[31]. Exogenous hydrogen sulfide is a potent genotoxin in vitro[. Finally, although no strong evidence has yet been found to indict a specific microbe in colonic carcinogenesis, a recent study found that Fusobacterium nucleatum was enriched in human colon cancer tissue, and suggested that the microbe might promote colorectal neoplasia progression through recruitment of proinflammatory tumor-infiltrating immune cells[33]. Alternatively, members of our group have hypothesized that fusobacteria may promote genotoxity by their ability to convert cysteine to hydrogen sulfide[34]. shows that the presence and activity of both of these microbes may have played a role in the changes in mucosal biomarkers: the high fiber, low fat dietary intervention in African Americans was associated with in a significant decrease of B. wadsworthia, whilst the low fiber high fat intervention in Africans was associated with an increase of F. nucleatum.

Discussion

We have shown in individuals from high risk and from low cancer risk populations that changes in the food content of fiber and fat had remarkable effects on their colonic microbiota and metabonome within 2 weeks, and, critically, that these changes were associated with significant changes in mucosal inflammation and proliferation. Whilst we cannot claim from our results that these changes in mucosa will result in changes in the development of cancer, there is good experimental evidence that increased epithelial proliferation predicts neoplastic change because it increases the risk of development of DNA mutations due to the higher rate of exposure of sensitive proliferating cells to luminal carcinogens. The evidence for the use of proliferation biomarkers in humans is based on the known increase in the percentage of epithelial cells engaged in DNA synthesis (measured as “proliferation index”) in all premalignant conditions of the gastrointestinal tract, as well as the observed expansion of the proliferative zone, causing a shift of the proliferating cells from the base to the surface of the crypt[35-37]. There is also substantial evidence that chronic inflammation increases cancer risk[38] and it has been observed in human studies that colon cancer is increased 5-fold in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis[38] and reduced 50% by anti-inflammatory drugs[39]. In keeping with this, it was noteworthy that our two biomarkers on mucosal inflammation, CD3+ intraepithelial lymphocytes and CD68+ lamina propria macrophages responded in the same direction as our Ki67 proliferative biomarker. CD3+ intraepithelial lymphocytes provide a measure of T cell activation and therefore the pivotal balance between immune activation and quiescence in response to luminal antigens, such as bacteria[40,41], while CD68+ lamina propria macrophages play an active role in the persistence of chronic inflammation[42] and neoplastic progression[43,44]. Interestingly, the microbial metabolite, butyrate, was shown recently to reduce the responsiveness of lamina propria macrophages to commensal bacteria[45], suggesting that the dietary change in Americans may have resulted in a decrease in both macrophage numbers and their activity. Our study revealed two unanticipated colonic mucosal findings in rural Africans consuming their usual baseline diets. First, despite the significantly lower epithelial proliferation and population colon cancer rates, mucosal inflammation detected endoscopically, histologically, and by immunohistochemistry, was more common and pronounced compared to high risk African Americans ( Secondly, despite the lower protein intake and lower plasma amino acid levels (), proteolytic fermentation was also increased, releasing metabolites that are known to be inflammatory and pro-carcinogenic[46]. The explanation for these findings is unclear, but may be linked to the high prevalence of chronic parasitic infestations in rural Africans causing inflammation and exudation of mucinous proteins. Of note, schistosoma were incidentally identified in two subjects, and a tapeworm segment in another (). Intestinal protozoa have been hypothesized to stimulate immunosurveillance against colon cancer[47]. Clearly further focused investigations of these paradoxical findings are needed, but possible explanations involve the complex associations between inflammation, immunosurveillance, and carcinogenesis, and the ability of butyrogenesis to arrest the progression of inflammation to neoplasia. In murine models, lymphocytes can suppress carcinogenesis as part of the process of immunosurveillance, and in patients with tumors, specific intra-tumor lymphocyte markers for Th1 polarization and cytotoxic and memory T cells have been shown to suppress growth and metastasis, a process termed immunoediting[48,49]. Furthermore, Thus, T cell infiltration may suppress or enhance tumorigenesis, depending upon the type, density and location of the immune cells. There is substantial experimental evidence, recently reviewed by us[7], that the major products of saccharolytic fermentation, acetate, propionate, and butyrate, have potent anti-neoplastic properties [50], but butyrate is unique in its maintenance of colonic mucosal health and defense. First, it is the preferred energy source for colonocytes[51]. Second, it has a remarkably wide variety of antineoplastic properties, best exemplified by its function as a histone deacetylase inhibitor[52], its capacity to down-regulate the key canonical Wnt-signaling pathway linked to colonic carcinogenesis [53], and its ability to reduce the burden of carcinogens, such as bile acids[28,29,54] and red meat products[26]. Further studies are needed to explore the intriguing possibility that increased saccharolytic fermentation and butyrogenesis may counter the recognized proliferative properties of T helper type 17 T cells (TH17)[55] Although we have focused on the potential for a high fiber and high fat to modify metabolic pathways that have been shown experimentally to impact mucosal biomarkers of cancer risk, it must be stressed that a change in one aspect of an otherwise isocaloric diet will inevitably result in a change in another. Consequently, the associated change in animal protein or digestible carbohydrate might also be responsible for the observed mucosal changes. Be that as it may, our results provide fairly substantial evidence for an powerful influence of butyrate on mucosal health, and raise hope that an increase in fiber consumption, together with a moderation in fat intake, may reduce the disproportionately high incidence of colon cancer in African Americans, and indeed in most westernized communities. Clearly, these suggestions need now to be confirmed by longitudinal studies. With regard to fiber, total quantities may be critical, as fiber supplementation at ≈35 g/d has generally failed to reduce polyp recurrence in clinical trials[56] and recent experimental studies demonstrate that a threshold effect of butyrate availability determines its inhibitory effect on proliferation[52]. Furthermore, human studies by Burkitt concluded that total fiber intake needs to exceed 50 g/d (as in our study) to prevent colon cancer[57]. Our results also raise serious concern that the progressive westernization of African communities may reduce butyrogenesis, allowing their high basal state of chronic inflammation to progress through proliferation to neoplasia[38], culminating in the emergence of colon cancer as a major health issue[58].

Methods

Study Design

First, the study was submitted to the University of Pittsburgh and University of KwaZulu-Natal Institutional Review Boards for approval. We employed a unique design (), where 20 healthy middle aged African Americans and 20 rural Africans () from the same communities previously studied [5] were studied first for 2 weeks in their own home environment, eating their usual food (HE study), and then again in-house whilst they were fed the intervention diet for 2 weeks (DI study). Consequently, each subject served as his/her own control, which is important given the known wide individual variation in colonic microbiota composition. We chose intervention diets that were at the same time palatable and contained reverse quantities of fiber and fat, such that African Americans would be given ‘African style’ foods increasing their average fiber intake from 14g/d to 55g/d and reducing their fat from 35% to 16% of total calories, whilst Africans were given a ‘western style’ diet reducing their fibre from 66g/d to 12g/d and increasing their fat from 16% to 52% (). Cogniscient of the problems of compliance to acute dietary change and the accuracy of dietary recall to estimate actual intakes within the community, we elected to perform all the dietary intervention studies in-house, where meals could be prepared and given under close supervision. With African Americans, participants were housed the University of Pittsburgh Clinical Translational Research Center (CTRC) and with rural Africans, we employed in a rural lodging facility, close to their homes, with full kitchen facilities. Body weights were maintained within 2 kg by adjusting food quantities while keeping overall macronutrient composition the same. The sampling schedule is given on , showing that fresh fecal samples were taken at 3 intervals during the HE study and again 3 times after the diet switch. Colonoscopy was performed to identify latent disease, polyps, or cancer, to obtain 3h colonic evacuates for analysis and biopsies for biomarkers of cancer risk[4] at the beginning of the HE study and end of the DI study. Full details of the menus, cooking methods, and total dietary compositions are given under Supplementary Tables 4a-c, 2, and 3; Supplementary Note 2).

Subjects and Recruitment

Age and sex matched healthy volunteers, from the age range 50-65 years, were randomly selected from the African American population in the Pittsburgh region of Pennsylvania and from the rural native South Africans from the rural Kwazulu region. We collaborated with Dr Stephen Thomas, Director of Minority Studies at the University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health to recruit healthy African American volunteers from the Pittsburgh region, and also advertised the study with the approval of our IRB in public areas. In South Africa, volunteers were be recruited through advertisements placed in public community centers, e.g. post offices, town halls, civic centers, and through the iZulu Community Health Center. Appropriate compensation (as advised by Minority studies and the iZulu Community and ratified by the University of Pittsburgh and KwaZulu-Natal) for time and testing was paid to volunteers for participation.

Screening

Informed signed consent was taken from each participant. All African volunteers could understand English, but a nurse-translator participated in the consent process to ensure proper understanding of the details of the research procedures. Screening was performed in Pittsburgh at the CTRC and in Africa at Ngwelezana Hospital out-patient clinic, Empangeni, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. A detailed medical history was first taken. With rural Africans, a local bilingual nurse acted as interpreter. A 20ml blood sample was taken for full blood count, ESR, electrolytes and urea, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, AST and bilirubin. If the results were normal and if they satisfied the eligibility criteria, they were invited to participate in the study.

Subject Eligibility

Details are given under Healthy volunteers, from GI standpoint between 40-65 years (age at which colon cancer screening/colonoscopy is recommended in this population) and BMI between 18-35 Kg/m2 ( Participants pre-colonoscopy were ineligible if they had a history of familial adenomatous polyposis, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, or invasive cancer within 5 years before enrollment (h/o adenomatous polyps acceptable). Also ineligible were individuals with known renal, hepatic, or bleeding disorders; previous GI surgery resulting in disturbed gut function due to of loss of bowel or altered anatomy; or any form of chronic GI disease resulting in disturbed gut function, diarrhea, and malabsorption. Individuals with antibiotic use within the past 12 weeks (, current steroids use, or diabetes. Exclusion criteria post-colonoscopy were detection of previously unrecognized ulceration (with depth and >0.5cm), stricture, severe inflammation, and polyps >1cm diameter or cancer.

Fecal, Colonic, and Mucosal Sampling and Colonoscopy

To synchronize the measurements of the microbiota, the metabolome, and the colonic mucosa, the sampling was tied to the preparation for and conduct of a colonoscopy, as previously[4] described, at baseline whilst on their usual diet (ED1, ), and then again at the conclusion of the dietary change (ED2, ). In this, fresh fecal samples are collected prior to colonic evacuation and immediately frozen at −80°C, and total colonic contents are collected for 3 h during evacuation with a simple PEG solution. In this, two liters of polyethylene glycol (60g/l, molecular weight 3350) solution was consumed rapidly as possible over ½ h. We avoided using the commercial preparation ‘Golytely’, as it contains sodium sulfate, which is known to disturb the microbiota composition. Our experience had shown that the quality of bowel preparation with this technique was similar to the more conventional overnight bowel washout. The mucosa health status was assessed by visualization and biopsy. Polyps, when encountered, were removed per standard practice, and biopsies were taken from normal mucosa from the proximal (cecum/ascending colon) mid (transverse) and distal (sigmoid) colon at 25cm from the anal verge. Mucosal samples for immunohistochemistry were collected in formalized saline, and for gene expression in RNAlater (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) before being stored frozen at −80°C.

Measurement of Mucosal Biomarkers

Histology

Colonic mucosal biopsies were obtained by colonoscopy before and after dietary switch from 3 different sites (ascending, transverse and descending) and stored in 10% buffered formalin. Later, the biopsy samples were embedded in paraffin and 5-mm sections were cut and stained with either routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or immunohistochemical stains (see below). The histologic findings on the H&E stained sections were evaluated by one blinded experienced gastroenterological histopathologist (AK). Measurements focused on the numbers of inflammatory cells and eosinophils in the lamina propria and the numbers of intraepithelial lymphocytes. Scoring of the H&E stained section was done as shown on . Any pathologic finding, such as presence of parasitic organisms, was recorded.

Immunohistochemistry

Slides for CD3 and Ki67 staining were deparaffinized at 60° for 2 hours. To inhibit endogenous peroxidase, the slides were pre-treated using 3% hydrogen peroxide/methanol at room temperature (RT) for 10 min, followed by antigen retrieval with 0.2% pepsin solution (# P7012, Sigma, 3050 Spruce St., St. Louis, MO, USA) at 37° for 10 min. Serum Free Protein Block (# X0909, Dako, 6392 Via Real, Carpinteria, CA 93013, USA) was used at RT for 10 min. The slides were drained and incubated with Primary antibodies CD3 and Ki-67 (# A0452, 1:100, rabbit polyclonal, Dako; # MIB-1, 1:100, mouse monoclonal, Dako) respectively at RT for 1 hr. Secondary detection was applied using Immpress universal antibody Polymer detection kit (# MP-7500, Vector Labs, 30 Ingold Road, Burlingame, CA 94010, USA) at RT for 30 min. The slides were stained with DAB substrate kit (# SK-4100, Vector Labs) for 10 min and counter stained using Shandon Hematoxylin (# 6765015, Thermo Scientific, 81 Wyman St, Waltham, MA 02451, USA). Slide staining for CD68 was done on a Ventana Benchmark Ultra slide stainer. Deparaffinized slides were pretreated using the ultra CC1 (# 950-224, Ventana, 1910 Innovation Park Dr., Tucson, AZ 85755, USA) for 24 min for antigen retrieval. Slides were incubated with the Primary antibody CD68 (# M087601, 1:100, mouse monoclonal, Clone PG-M1, Dako,) for 32min RT. The Optivew DAB kit (# 760-700, Ventana) was used for secondary detection.

Quantification of immunohistochemical staining

Counting of the proportions of positive staining cells using light microscopy at x400 magnification was performed by a single investigator (KM), under blinded conditions. To assess inter-observer variability, 40 slides were randomly selected and recounted by a second senior pathologist (AK), showing a concurrence of 88% for Ki67+ and 80% for CD68+ densities.

Ki67

The proportion of Ki67 positive staining cells were counted in well-oriented crypts (average/slide 8, range 4-14). Ki67 proliferation rate was defined as number of Ki67+ cells divided by the total number of crypt cells and expressed as percentage. The differences were found to be the same in the total crypt and in the upper crypt, so only the total crypt proportions are reported here.

CD3

Only CD3+ staining intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL) were counted in a representative area of at least 300 epithelial cells. The density of IELs was expressed as an index of number of CD3-positive lymphocytes per 100 epithelial cells.

CD68

The number of CD68 positive cells (macrophages) within the lamina propria were counted and graded on a scale from 1-3: Grade 1 (None/rare), Grade 2 (scattered superficial collections) and Grade 3 (strong, diffuse or band-like infiltrate in the superficial lamina propria) as shown in .

Targeted Analysis of Fecal and Colonic Microbes and Metabolites of Special Interest

Details of the materials and methods used for the collection, preparation and analysis of fecal samples for targeted analysis of microbes of special interest (real-time quantitative PCR) and their metabolites (Agilent Technologies 6890N Network GC System with a flame-ionization detector for short chain fatty acids and Shimadzu HPLC-MS for quantification using electrospray ionization in negative ion mode by monitoring the (M-H)− ion for bile acids) in African Americans and rural Africans have been previously published[5]. Justification for the use of the BcoA functional gene for butyrate production is that Flint's group in Aberdeen have demonstrated that whilst there are a number of different metabolic pathways that use different enzymes that culminate in butyrate synthesis, butyryl-CoA:acetate CoA-transferase, the product of the BcoA gene, is responsible for the last step in butyrate synthesis in the vast majority of intestinal butyrate producers[13]. Similarly, there are other microbial enzymes that participate in bile acid deconjugation, but Wells et al demonstrated that there was a good correlation between human fecal bacterial dehydroxylating activity measured by fecal dilution assay and their PCR assay for the baiCD gene which encodes the key enzyme responsible for the bile acid 7alpha-dehydroxylation pathway[23]

Plasma Amino Acids

fasting blood concentrations were measured in extracted plasma by reverse-phase C-18 precolumn derivatization HPLC (AccQ•Tag™ Ultra derivatization, Waters, Milford, MA) as previously[5].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of the group differences in continuous variables was conducted using SPSS 16.0 (SPSS Inc). The significance of group differences for normally distributed data was assessed with unpaired and paired Student's t tests. The nonparametric data were analyzed with a Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance by ranks for unpaired data, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test tests for paired data. The significance of the association was evaluated with Spearman's rank correlation test. A level of p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. Data are presented as means ±SEs. Complex microbiota and metabonome data were analyzed by several multivariate ordinations detailed below (principal component analyses, nonmetric multidimensional scaling), Kruskal-Wallis independent tests, and multivariate ANOVA with Bonferroni correction.

Global Analysis of the Microbiota Composition and Diversity

We chose the Human Intestinal Tract (HIT)Chip phylogenetic microarray for the global profiling of microbiota composition. It has been demonstrated that the HITChip analysis of fecal samples provides highly concordant results concerning the microbiota composition when compared to 16S rRNA gene or metagenome sequencing[59-62] since it allows deep profiling of phylotypes at high resolution, down to <0.1% relative abundance; corresponding to a duplicated set of 100,000 pyrosequencing reads per sample with very high reproducibility (>98%)[59] and at considerably lower cost.

HITChip Analysis

DNA was isolated from fecal or colonic samples and subsequently used for phylogenetic profiling of the intestinal microbiota using the HITChip phylogenetic microarray[16]. Standardized quality control was maintained through our library of a duplicated set of 3,631 probes targeting the 16S rRNA gene sequences of over 1,000 intestinal bacterial phylotypes. Briefly, the full-length 16S rRNA genes were amplified, and PCR products were transcribed in vitro into RNA, labeled with Cy3 and Cy5 and fragmented. Hybridizations were performed in duplicate and data was extracted from microarray-scanned images using Agilent Feature Extraction software, version 10.7.3.1 (http://www.agilent.com). Array normalization was performed as previously described using a set of custom R scripts (http://r-project.org) and stored in a custom MySQL database (http://www.mysql.com). Duplicate hybridizations with a Pearson correlation >98% were considered for further analysis. Microbiota profiles were generated by pre-processing the probe-level measurements with min-max normalization and the frozen-RPA probe summarization[62,63] into three phylogenetic levels: level 1, defined as order-like 16S rRNA gene sequence groups; level 2, defined as genus-like 16S rRNA gene sequence groups (sequence similarity >90%); and level 3, phylotype-like 16S rRNA gene sequence groups (sequence similarity >98%). In the present work we primarily focus on the genus-level (level 2) variation. Significance of the differences between the time points (Fig. 3A) were estimated based on a (paired) linear model for microarrays (limma) with the threshold of FDR<0.2 estimated based on Benjamini-Hochberg procedure and a minimum fold-change of 25% (0.1 at the Log10 scale)[64].
Figure 3

The impact of diet switch on microbiota composition and co-occurrence networks

Panel A provides an overview of significantly altered genus-like bacterial groups (FDR<0.2; linear model) following the 14-day diet change. Average fraction of total HITChip signal (proxy for relative abundance) over the samples for each comparison. Black and grey squares indicate the average abundances at home- and intervention diet, respectively. Panel B illustrates the microbiota genus-like group co-occurrence networks of Africans and African Americans under both dietary regimens for genus-like groups. Groups with correlation differences >1 before and after the diet and at least |r| >0.5 are shown. Positive correlations are indicated with green lines; negative correlations with red lines. Identically colored nodes indicate network modules with three or more co-occurring groups. Grey nodes represent modules of less than three co-occurring groups or those not represented by a module. The sample sizes are 20 African Americans and 17 rural (Native) Africans.

Microbial Co-Occurrence Network Analysis

We constructed the co-occurrence networks between the 130 genus-like bacterial groups based on their logarithmic abundances (HITChip log10 signal) within each treatment group (African Americans and Native Africans; before and after the dietary intervention). For a robust correlation analysis we applied the SparCC algorithm using 20 iterations, and with 50 bootstrap data sets for significance testing, followed by q-value[65] correction of the pseudo p-values from the bootstrap analysis. We focused on the significant (|r|>0.5; q<0.01) correlations between the genus-like groups where a qualitative change (change of sign) in the correlation was observed following the dietary intervention. To ensure robust analysis, we included only the correlations that changed drastically in the intervention, with a difference of >1 between the correlation values before and after intervention (so that the correlations would change for instance from −0.5 to 0.5 or higher). This provided a list of genus-like bacteria that had significant changes in their mutual correlation networks following the dietary intervention in either rural African or African American group. To simplify interpretation, we clustered the associated genus-like groups into coherent network modules with complete-linkage hierarchical clustering based on the SparCC correlations. We defined a module as a connected sub-network where the correlations between all genus-like groups within the module are r>0.5. Networks were visualized using the network visualization and exploration platform Gephi[66]. The resulting modules are highlighted in .

Global Analysis of the Metabolome: Sample preparation for NMR spectroscopic analysis

All urinary samples were thawed at room temperature and vortexed for 10 sec. A total of 400 μl of urinary sample was thoroughly mixed with 250 μl of 0.2 M sodium phosphate buffer containing 20% D2O, pH=7.4, 0.01% 3-(trimethylsilyl)-[2,2,3,3-2H4]propionic acid sodium salt (TSP) and 3 mM sodium azide (NaN3). The mixture was subsequently centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 10 min and 600 μl of supernatant was transferred into an NMR tube with an outer diameter of 5 mm. Approximately 200 mg of wet fecal sample was mixed with 600 μl of H2O (HPLC grade) in a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube. A cycle of 30-sec vortexing, 5-min sonicating at 4 °C and 30-sec vortexing was then carried out on the mixture, followed by centrifuging at 10,000 x g for 10 min. A total of 400 μl of supernatant was added into a 1.5 ml Eppendorf containing 250 μl of aforementioned sodium phosphate buffer, vortexed and spun at 10,000 × g for 10 min. An amount of 600 μl of supernatant was put into an NMR tube.

1H NMR spectroscopy

1H NMR spectra of urinary and fecal water extract samples were acquired using a Bruker 600 MHz spectrometer (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany) at the operating 1H frequency of 600.13 MHz at a temperature of 300 K. An NMR pulse sequence (recycle delay −90°-t1-90°-tm-90°-acquisition) and standard parameters were used to obtain standard one-dimensional 1H NMR spectral data as described in Beckonert et al [.

Multivariate statistical data analysis

1H NMR spectra of urine and fecal extracts were automatically phased, referenced to TSP at 1H δ0.00 and baseline-corrected using an in-house developed MATLAB script (Dr. Tim Ebbels, Imperial College London). The processed NMR spectra (1H δ 0 to 10) were imported to MATLAB (R2012a, MathWorks) and digitized into 20 k data points with a resolution of 0.0005 ppm using an in-house developed script. The water peak region in urine (4.7-5.14 ppm) and fecal water spectra (4.7-5.18 ppm) were removed to minimize the effect of the disordered baseline caused by water suppression. In addition, regions (1H 0-0.3) in urine spectra, and regions (1H 0-0.25) in fecal water spectra containing only noise were therefore removed, together with the urea signal in urine (1H 5.48-6.24). Due to the heavy peak shifting in urinary spectra, a recursive segment-wise peak alignment method was applied in order to improve metabolic biomarker recovery[68]. Probabilistic quotient normalization was subsequently performed on the resulting datasets in order to account for dilution of complex biological mixtures[69]. Principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was carried out with a unit variance scaling method in SIMCA (P+13.0) and MATLAB software. P values of metabolites were calculated using ANOVA and false discovery rate (FDR) was also calculated for each metabolite marker[70]. For the two-way clustered heatmap () between fecal microbiota and metabolite concentrations in urine and feces, the partial correlation was calculated for each phylotype and metabolite. The correlation was adjusted for country and dietary intervention to account for baseline differences. A pFDR cut-off of 0.3 was used to define the significance (denoted by ‘+’) to account for the different numbers of samples in each data set. For each data set (microbiota, fecal metabolites, urinary metabolites) the data was clustered using hierarchical cluster analyses with complete linkage. The optimal number of clusters was chosen as the splitting that maximized the modularity using the correlation as weight of each edge in the network.

Metabolic Reaction Network Generation

Using the freely available MetaboNetworks software[19] reactions that occur spontaneously or by means of enzymes linked to human and/or bacterial genomes were identified in the Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). All complete genome sequences listed in KEGG that could be associated to the bacterial groups represented on the HITChip were included in creating the database, resulting in a total of 817 bacterial genomes included in the database. Next, the software was used to construct a shortest-path metabolic reaction network between all (fecal and urinary) metabolites significantly different in any of the different dietary comparisons. From this ‘global network’, 2 sub-graphs were generated for each of the two dietary switches using significantly associated fecal metabolites. In order to highlight the differential expression of the metabolites associated with specific pathways, the background shading was added to the graphs to indicate the different interconnecting pathways (). The abbreviations and full names of these metabolites can be found in .
Table 2

Faecal and Urinary Metabolites

a) Fecal MetabolitesChemical shift Chemical shift (1H ppm)Home environment African American (N=15) vs. African (N=19)Dietary intervention African American (N=14) vs. African (N=20)African American Home environment (N=15) vs. Dietary intervention (N=14)African Home environment (N=19) vs. Dietary intervention (N=20)

Q2Y=0.59; R2X=29.8%Q2Y=0.74; R2X=26.8%Q2Y=0.66; R2X=37.2%Q2Y=0.37; R2X=30.7%

rpqrpqrpqrpq
valine0.990.77[a]<0.0010.0020.82[c]<0.0010.003
leucine0.970.75[a]<0.0010.0030.75[c]0.0010.02
isoleucine1.0070.78[a]<0.0010.0010.77[c]<0.0010.01
glutamate2.360.82[c]<0.001<0.0010.84[c]<0.001<0.001
alanine1.480.7[a]0.0030.0070.79[c]<0.0010.009
glycine3.570.72[a]0.0020.0050.82[c]<0.0010.002
tyrosine6.910.74[a]<0.0010.0030.81[c]<0.0010.001
butyrate0.890.67[a]0.0070.010.71[a]<0.0010.006
propionate1.060.75[a]<0.0010.0020.71[a]<0.0010.006
valerate1.290.73[a]0.0010.0040.66[a]0.0050.01
acetate1.930.74[a]<0.0010.0030.7[c]0.030.0060.75[a]<0.0010.005
lactate1.340.75[a]<0.0010.0020.77[c]<0.0010.009
formate8.450.69[a]0.0020.009
choline3.20.78[b]<0.0010.0010.66[d]0.0060.01
uracil5.810.78[a]<0.0010.001
hypoxanthine8.210.74[a]<0.0010.0030.69[a]0.0020.008
6-aminosalicylic acid[*]7.010.85[c]<0.001<0.0010.77[c]<0.0010.005
fumarate6.530.69[a]0.0020.008
phenylacetate3.540.81[a]<0.001<0.001
β-xylose4.580.72[a]<0.0010.006
β-arabinose4.530.74[a]<0.0010.005
nicotinate8.620.71[a]<0.0010.005
threonine4.260.77[a]<0.0010.002

Table 2 a) and b) show significantly changed fecal and urinary metabolites in each pairwise comparison (e.g. African American vs. African during home environment, African American at home environment vs. dietary intervention). Representative chemical shift of each metabolite is provided. The r values are Pearson's correlation coefficient from the correlation of the metabolite concentrations with classification (e.g. African Americans vs. Native Africans). P and q values represent the significance of the metabolite changes and false discovery rate-adjusted p values76, respectively.

higher in home environment – Africans

higher levels of metabolites in home environment – African Americans

higher in dietary switch – African Americans

higher in dietary switch – Africans.

Tentative assignment.

  66 in total

Review 1.  Dietary bioactive compounds and their health implications.

Authors:  Rui Hai Liu
Journal:  J Food Sci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Microarray analysis and barcoded pyrosequencing provide consistent microbial profiles depending on the source of human intestinal samples.

Authors:  Bartholomeus van den Bogert; Willem M de Vos; Erwin G Zoetendal; Michiel Kleerebezem
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Cancer immunoediting: from immunosurveillance to tumor escape.

Authors:  Gavin P Dunn; Allen T Bruce; Hiroaki Ikeda; Lloyd J Old; Robert D Schreiber
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 25.606

4.  Diseases of the alimentary tract and western diets.

Authors:  D P Burkitt
Journal:  Pathol Microbiol (Basel)       Date:  1973

5.  Evidence that hydrogen sulfide is a genotoxic agent.

Authors:  Matias S Attene-Ramos; Elizabeth D Wagner; Michael J Plewa; H Rex Gaskins
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.852

6.  Intestinal protozoa are hypothesized to stimulate immunosurveillance against colon cancer.

Authors:  David A Juckett; Charles F Aylsworth; Janet Murphy Quensen
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 1.538

Review 7.  Aspirin and NSAIDs for the prevention of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  John A Baron
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2009

8.  Utilization of nutrients by isolated epithelial cells of the rat colon.

Authors:  W E Roediger
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes.

Authors:  Gary D Wu; Jun Chen; Christian Hoffmann; Kyle Bittinger; Ying-Yu Chen; Sue A Keilbaugh; Meenakshi Bewtra; Dan Knights; William A Walters; Rob Knight; Rohini Sinha; Erin Gilroy; Kernika Gupta; Robert Baldassano; Lisa Nessel; Hongzhe Li; Frederic D Bushman; James D Lewis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Up-regulation of macrophage wnt gene expression in adenoma-carcinoma progression of human colorectal cancer.

Authors:  K Smith; T D Bui; R Poulsom; L Kaklamanis; G Williams; A L Harris
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  278 in total

1.  Black Raspberries and Their Anthocyanin and Fiber Fractions Alter the Composition and Diversity of Gut Microbiota in F-344 Rats.

Authors:  Pan Pan; Vy Lam; Nita Salzman; Yi-Wen Huang; Jianhua Yu; Jianying Zhang; Li-Shu Wang
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.900

Review 2.  Modifiable Host Factors in Melanoma: Emerging Evidence for Obesity, Diet, Exercise, and the Microbiome.

Authors:  Allison Betof Warner; Jennifer L McQuade
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Race-dependent association of sulfidogenic bacteria with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Cemal Yazici; Patricia G Wolf; Hajwa Kim; Tzu-Wen L Cross; Karin Vermillion; Timothy Carroll; Gaius J Augustus; Ece Mutlu; Lisa Tussing-Humphreys; Carol Braunschweig; Rosa M Xicola; Barbara Jung; Xavier Llor; Nathan A Ellis; H Rex Gaskins
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Surveying Gut Microbiome Research in Africans: Toward Improved Diversity and Representation.

Authors:  Ryan Brewster; Fiona B Tamburini; Edgar Asiimwe; Ovokeraye Oduaran; Scott Hazelhurst; Ami S Bhatt
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 17.079

5.  Colonic mucosal and exfoliome transcriptomic profiling and fecal microbiome response to a flaxseed lignan extract intervention in humans.

Authors:  Johanna W Lampe; Eunji Kim; Lisa Levy; Laurie A Davidson; Jennifer S Goldsby; Fayth L Miles; Sandi L Navarro; Timothy W Randolph; Ni Zhao; Ivan Ivanov; Andrew M Kaz; Christopher Damman; David M Hockenbery; Meredith A J Hullar; Robert S Chapkin
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Yogurt consumption and colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Samara B Rifkin; Francis M Giardiello; Xiangzhu Zhu; Linda M Hylind; Reid M Ness; Julia L Drewes; Harvey J Murff; Emma H Spence; Walter E Smalley; Joell J Gills; Gerard E Mullin; David Kafonek; Louis La Luna; Wei Zheng; Cynthia L Sears; Martha J Shrubsole
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 3.718

7.  A gut feeling about immunity.

Authors:  Roxanne Khamsi
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 8.  Environmental Factors, Gut Microbiota, and Colorectal Cancer Prevention.

Authors:  Mingyang Song; Andrew T Chan
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 9.  Diet and the Human Gut Microbiome: An International Review.

Authors:  Annette S Wilson; Kathryn R Koller; Matsepo C Ramaboli; Lucky T Nesengani; Soeren Ocvirk; Caixia Chen; Christie A Flanagan; Flora R Sapp; Zoe T Merritt; Faheem Bhatti; Timothy K Thomas; Stephen J D O'Keefe
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Captivity humanizes the primate microbiome.

Authors:  Jonathan B Clayton; Pajau Vangay; Hu Huang; Tonya Ward; Benjamin M Hillmann; Gabriel A Al-Ghalith; Dominic A Travis; Ha Thang Long; Bui Van Tuan; Vo Van Minh; Francis Cabana; Tilo Nadler; Barbara Toddes; Tami Murphy; Kenneth E Glander; Timothy J Johnson; Dan Knights
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.