| Literature DB >> 25919227 |
Stephen J D O'Keefe1, Jia V Li2, Leo Lahti3, Junhai Ou1, Franck Carbonero4, Khaled Mohammed1, Joram M Posma2, James Kinross2, Elaine Wahl1, Elizabeth Ruder5, Kishore Vipperla1, Vasudevan Naidoo6, Lungile Mtshali6, Sebastian Tims7, Philippe G B Puylaert7, James DeLany8, Alyssa Krasinskas9, Ann C Benefiel4, Hatem O Kaseb1, Keith Newton6, Jeremy K Nicholson2, Willem M de Vos10, H Rex Gaskins4, Erwin G Zoetendal7.
Abstract
Rates of colon cancer are much higher in African Americans (65:100,000) than in rural South Africans (<5:100,000). The higher rates are associated with higher animal protein and fat, and lower fibre consumption, higher colonic secondary bile acids, lower colonic short-chain fatty acid quantities and higher mucosal proliferative biomarkers of cancer risk in otherwise healthy middle-aged volunteers. Here we investigate further the role of fat and fibre in this association. We performed 2-week food exchanges in subjects from the same populations, where African Americans were fed a high-fibre, low-fat African-style diet and rural Africans a high-fat, low-fibre western-style diet, under close supervision. In comparison with their usual diets, the food changes resulted in remarkable reciprocal changes in mucosal biomarkers of cancer risk and in aspects of the microbiota and metabolome known to affect cancer risk, best illustrated by increased saccharolytic fermentation and butyrogenesis, and suppressed secondary bile acid synthesis in the African Americans.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25919227 PMCID: PMC4415091 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7342
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Study design, time schedule and sampling
ED 1 and ED 2 are the initial and final endoscopy days, HE is the home environment and DI is dietary intervention periods. The Xs corresponding to dietary evaluation indicate the frequency of dietary recordings; three days during the home environment when consuming their usual diets, and daily during the dietary intervention.
| Day | 0 | 7 | 14 | 15 | 22 | 29 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOME ENVIRONMENT (HE) STUDY | DIETARY INTERVENTION (DI) | |||||
| at home | in-house | |||||
| Period | ED 1 | HE 1 | HE 2 | DI 1 | DI 2 | ED 2 |
| Faecal Samples | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Colonic evacuates | X | X | ||||
| Breath H2, CH4 | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Bloods | X | X | ||||
| Mucosal biopsies | X | X | ||||
| Dietary observations | XXX | X X X X X X X X X X X X X X | ||||
Figure 3The impact of diet switch on microbiota composition and co-occurrence networks
Panel A provides an overview of significantly altered genus-like bacterial groups (FDR<0.2; linear model) following the 14-day diet change. Average fraction of total HITChip signal (proxy for relative abundance) over the samples for each comparison. Black and grey squares indicate the average abundances at home- and intervention diet, respectively. Panel B illustrates the microbiota genus-like group co-occurrence networks of Africans and African Americans under both dietary regimens for genus-like groups. Groups with correlation differences >1 before and after the diet and at least |r| >0.5 are shown. Positive correlations are indicated with green lines; negative correlations with red lines. Identically colored nodes indicate network modules with three or more co-occurring groups. Grey nodes represent modules of less than three co-occurring groups or those not represented by a module. The sample sizes are 20 African Americans and 17 rural (Native) Africans.
Faecal and Urinary Metabolites
| a) Fecal Metabolites | Chemical shift Chemical shift (1H ppm) | Home environment African American (N=15) vs. African (N=19) | Dietary intervention African American (N=14) vs. African (N=20) | African American Home environment (N=15) vs. Dietary intervention (N=14) | African Home environment (N=19) vs. Dietary intervention (N=20) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2Y=0.59; R2X=29.8% | Q2Y=0.74; R2X=26.8% | Q2Y=0.66; R2X=37.2% | Q2Y=0.37; R2X=30.7% | ||||||||||
| r | p | q | r | p | q | r | p | q | r | p | q | ||
| valine | 0.99 | 0.77[ | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.82[ | <0.001 | 0.003 | ||||||
| leucine | 0.97 | 0.75[ | <0.001 | 0.003 | 0.75[ | 0.001 | 0.02 | ||||||
| isoleucine | 1.007 | 0.78[ | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.77[ | <0.001 | 0.01 | ||||||
| glutamate | 2.36 | 0.82[ | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.84[ | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||||
| alanine | 1.48 | 0.7[ | 0.003 | 0.007 | 0.79[ | <0.001 | 0.009 | ||||||
| glycine | 3.57 | 0.72[ | 0.002 | 0.005 | 0.82[ | <0.001 | 0.002 | ||||||
| tyrosine | 6.91 | 0.74[ | <0.001 | 0.003 | 0.81[ | <0.001 | 0.001 | ||||||
| butyrate | 0.89 | 0.67[ | 0.007 | 0.01 | 0.71[ | <0.001 | 0.006 | ||||||
| propionate | 1.06 | 0.75[ | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.71[ | <0.001 | 0.006 | ||||||
| valerate | 1.29 | 0.73[ | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.66[ | 0.005 | 0.01 | ||||||
| acetate | 1.93 | 0.74[ | <0.001 | 0.003 | 0.7[ | 0.03 | 0.006 | 0.75[ | <0.001 | 0.005 | |||
| lactate | 1.34 | 0.75[ | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.77[ | <0.001 | 0.009 | ||||||
| formate | 8.45 | 0.69[ | 0.002 | 0.009 | |||||||||
| choline | 3.2 | 0.78[ | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.66[ | 0.006 | 0.01 | ||||||
| uracil | 5.81 | 0.78[ | <0.001 | 0.001 | |||||||||
| hypoxanthine | 8.21 | 0.74[ | <0.001 | 0.003 | 0.69[ | 0.002 | 0.008 | ||||||
| 6-aminosalicylic acid[ | 7.01 | 0.85[ | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.77[ | <0.001 | 0.005 | ||||||
| fumarate | 6.53 | 0.69[ | 0.002 | 0.008 | |||||||||
| phenylacetate | 3.54 | 0.81[ | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||||||
| β-xylose | 4.58 | 0.72[ | <0.001 | 0.006 | |||||||||
| β-arabinose | 4.53 | 0.74[ | <0.001 | 0.005 | |||||||||
| nicotinate | 8.62 | 0.71[ | <0.001 | 0.005 | |||||||||
| threonine | 4.26 | 0.77[ | <0.001 | 0.002 | |||||||||
Table 2 a) and b) show significantly changed fecal and urinary metabolites in each pairwise comparison (e.g. African American vs. African during home environment, African American at home environment vs. dietary intervention). Representative chemical shift of each metabolite is provided. The r values are Pearson's correlation coefficient from the correlation of the metabolite concentrations with classification (e.g. African Americans vs. Native Africans). P and q values represent the significance of the metabolite changes and false discovery rate-adjusted p values76, respectively.
higher in home environment – Africans
higher levels of metabolites in home environment – African Americans
higher in dietary switch – African Americans
higher in dietary switch – Africans.
Tentative assignment.