Literature DB >> 29036412

Radiomic subtyping improves disease stratification beyond key molecular, clinical, and standard imaging characteristics in patients with glioblastoma.

Philipp Kickingereder1, Ulf Neuberger1, David Bonekamp2, Paula L Piechotta1, Michael Götz3, Antje Wick4, Martin Sill5, Annekathrin Kratz6,7, Russell T Shinohara8, David T W Jones9,10, Alexander Radbruch1,2, John Muschelli11, Andreas Unterberg12, Jürgen Debus13,14, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer2, Christel Herold-Mende, Stefan Pfister9,10,15, Andreas von Deimling6,7, Wolfgang Wick4,16, David Capper6,7,17, Klaus H Maier-Hein3, Martin Bendszus1.   

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to analyze the potential of radiomics for disease stratification beyond key molecular, clinical, and standard imaging features in patients with glioblastoma.
Methods: Quantitative imaging features (n = 1043) were extracted from the multiparametric MRI of 181 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma prior to standard-of-care treatment (allocated to a discovery and a validation set, 2:1 ratio). A subset of 386/1043 features were identified as reproducible (in an independent MRI test-retest cohort) and selected for analysis. A penalized Cox model with 10-fold cross-validation (Coxnet) was fitted on the discovery set to construct a radiomic signature for predicting progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS). The incremental value of a radiomic signature beyond molecular (O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase [MGMT] promoter methylation, DNA methylation subgroups), clinical (patient's age, KPS, extent of resection, adjuvant treatment), and standard imaging parameters (tumor volumes) for stratifying PFS and OS was assessed with multivariate Cox models (performance quantified with prediction error curves).
Results: The radiomic signature (constructed from 8/386 features identified through Coxnet) increased the prediction accuracy for PFS and OS (in both discovery and validation sets) beyond the assessed molecular, clinical, and standard imaging parameters (P ≤ 0.01). Prediction errors decreased by 36% for PFS and 37% for OS when adding the radiomic signature (compared with 29% and 27%, respectively, with molecular + clinical features alone). The radiomic signature was-along with MGMT status-the only parameter with independent significance on multivariate analysis (P ≤ 0.01). Conclusions: Our study stresses the role of integrating radiomics into a multilayer decision framework with key molecular and clinical features to improve disease stratification and to potentially advance personalized treatment of patients with glioblastoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29036412      PMCID: PMC5961168          DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nox188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuro Oncol        ISSN: 1522-8517            Impact factor:   12.300


  37 in total

1.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary.

Authors:  David N Louis; Arie Perry; Guido Reifenberger; Andreas von Deimling; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Webster K Cavenee; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Paul Kleihues; David W Ellison
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 17.088

3.  Assessment of tumor oxygenation and its impact on treatment response in bevacizumab-treated recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  David Bonekamp; Kim Mouridsen; Alexander Radbruch; Felix T Kurz; Oliver Eidel; Antje Wick; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Wolfgang Wick; Martin Bendszus; Leif Østergaard; Philipp Kickingereder
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Large-scale Radiomic Profiling of Recurrent Glioblastoma Identifies an Imaging Predictor for Stratifying Anti-Angiogenic Treatment Response.

Authors:  Philipp Kickingereder; Michael Götz; John Muschelli; Antje Wick; Ulf Neuberger; Russell T Shinohara; Martin Sill; Martha Nowosielski; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Alexander Radbruch; Wolfgang Wick; Martin Bendszus; Klaus H Maier-Hein; David Bonekamp
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

6.  Hotspot mutations in H3F3A and IDH1 define distinct epigenetic and biological subgroups of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Dominik Sturm; Hendrik Witt; Volker Hovestadt; Dong-Anh Khuong-Quang; David T W Jones; Carolin Konermann; Elke Pfaff; Martje Tönjes; Martin Sill; Sebastian Bender; Marcel Kool; Marc Zapatka; Natalia Becker; Manuela Zucknick; Thomas Hielscher; Xiao-Yang Liu; Adam M Fontebasso; Marina Ryzhova; Steffen Albrecht; Karine Jacob; Marietta Wolter; Martin Ebinger; Martin U Schuhmann; Timothy van Meter; Michael C Frühwald; Holger Hauch; Arnulf Pekrun; Bernhard Radlwimmer; Tim Niehues; Gregor von Komorowski; Matthias Dürken; Andreas E Kulozik; Jenny Madden; Andrew Donson; Nicholas K Foreman; Rachid Drissi; Maryam Fouladi; Wolfram Scheurlen; Andreas von Deimling; Camelia Monoranu; Wolfgang Roggendorf; Christel Herold-Mende; Andreas Unterberg; Christof M Kramm; Jörg Felsberg; Christian Hartmann; Benedikt Wiestler; Wolfgang Wick; Till Milde; Olaf Witt; Anders M Lindroth; Jeremy Schwartzentruber; Damien Faury; Adam Fleming; Magdalena Zakrzewska; Pawel P Liberski; Krzysztof Zakrzewski; Peter Hauser; Miklos Garami; Almos Klekner; Laszlo Bognar; Sorana Morrissy; Florence Cavalli; Michael D Taylor; Peter van Sluis; Jan Koster; Rogier Versteeg; Richard Volckmann; Tom Mikkelsen; Kenneth Aldape; Guido Reifenberger; V Peter Collins; Jacek Majewski; Andrey Korshunov; Peter Lichter; Christoph Plass; Nada Jabado; Stefan M Pfister
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 31.743

7.  Magnetic resonance image features identify glioblastoma phenotypic subtypes with distinct molecular pathway activities.

Authors:  Haruka Itakura; Achal S Achrol; Lex A Mitchell; Joshua J Loya; Tiffany Liu; Erick M Westbroek; Abdullah H Feroze; Scott Rodriguez; Sebastian Echegaray; Tej D Azad; Kristen W Yeom; Sandy Napel; Daniel L Rubin; Steven D Chang; Griffith R Harsh; Olivier Gevaert
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 17.956

8.  Evaluation of tumor-derived MRI-texture features for discrimination of molecular subtypes and prediction of 12-month survival status in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Dalu Yang; Ganesh Rao; Juan Martinez; Ashok Veeraraghavan; Arvind Rao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Prognostic Imaging Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: Development and Independent Validation on the Basis of Multiregion and Quantitative Analysis of MR Images.

Authors:  Yi Cui; Khin Khin Tha; Shunsuke Terasaka; Shigeru Yamaguchi; Jeff Wang; Kohsuke Kudo; Lei Xing; Hiroki Shirato; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data.

Authors:  Robert J Gillies; Paul E Kinahan; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  67 in total

1.  Radiomics in peritumoral non-enhancing regions: fractional anisotropy and cerebral blood volume improve prediction of local progression and overall survival in patients with glioblastoma.

Authors:  Jung Youn Kim; Min Jae Yoon; Ji Eun Park; Eun Jung Choi; Jongho Lee; Ho Sung Kim
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Quality of science and reporting of radiomics in oncologic studies: room for improvement according to radiomics quality score and TRIPOD statement.

Authors:  Ji Eun Park; Donghyun Kim; Ho Sung Kim; Seo Young Park; Jung Youn Kim; Se Jin Cho; Jae Ho Shin; Jeong Hoon Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Radiogenomic-Based Survival Risk Stratification of Tumor Habitat on Gd-T1w MRI Is Associated with Biological Processes in Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Niha Beig; Kaustav Bera; Prateek Prasanna; Jacob Antunes; Ramon Correa; Salendra Singh; Anas Saeed Bamashmos; Marwa Ismail; Nathaniel Braman; Ruchika Verma; Virginia B Hill; Volodymyr Statsevych; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Vinay Varadan; Anant Madabhushi; Pallavi Tiwari
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  Imaging signatures of glioblastoma molecular characteristics: A radiogenomics review.

Authors:  Anahita Fathi Kazerooni; Spyridon Bakas; Hamidreza Saligheh Rad; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  MR Imaging-Based Radiomic Signatures of Distinct Molecular Subgroups of Medulloblastoma.

Authors:  M Iv; M Zhou; K Shpanskaya; S Perreault; Z Wang; E Tranvinh; B Lanzman; S Vajapeyam; N A Vitanza; P G Fisher; Y J Cho; S Laughlin; V Ramaswamy; M D Taylor; S H Cheshier; G A Grant; T Young Poussaint; O Gevaert; K W Yeom
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Voxel-wise radiogenomic mapping of tumor location with key molecular alterations in patients with glioma.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Tejada Neyra; Ulf Neuberger; Annekathrin Reinhardt; Gianluca Brugnara; David Bonekamp; Martin Sill; Antje Wick; David T W Jones; Alexander Radbruch; Andreas Unterberg; Jürgen Debus; Sabine Heiland; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Christel Herold-Mende; Stefan Pfister; Andreas von Deimling; Wolfgang Wick; David Capper; Martin Bendszus; Philipp Kickingereder
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 7.  The Use of Quantitative Imaging in Radiation Oncology: A Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) Perspective.

Authors:  Robert H Press; Hui-Kuo G Shu; Hyunsuk Shim; James M Mountz; Brenda F Kurland; Richard L Wahl; Ella F Jones; Nola M Hylton; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Robert J Nordstrom; Lori Henderson; Karen A Kurdziel; Bhadrasain Vikram; Michael A Jacobs; Matthias Holdhoff; Edward Taylor; David A Jaffray; Lawrence H Schwartz; David A Mankoff; Paul E Kinahan; Hannah M Linden; Philippe Lambin; Thomas J Dilling; Daniel L Rubin; Lubomir Hadjiiski; John M Buatti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  A Radiomics Nomogram for Preoperative Prediction of Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Li Yang; Dongsheng Gu; Jingwei Wei; Chun Yang; Shengxiang Rao; Wentao Wang; Caizhong Chen; Ying Ding; Jie Tian; Mengsu Zeng
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 11.740

9.  Relationship between the overall survival in glioblastomas and the radiomic features of intraoperative ultrasound: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Santiago Cepeda; Sergio García-García; Ignacio Arrese; María Velasco-Casares; Rosario Sarabia
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2021-02-16

10.  Sex is an important prognostic factor for glioblastoma but not for nonglioblastoma.

Authors:  Haley Gittleman; Quinn T Ostrom; L C Stetson; Kristin Waite; Tiffany R Hodges; Christina H Wright; James Wright; Joshua B Rubin; Michael E Berens; Justin Lathia; James R Connor; Carol Kruchko; Andrew E Sloan; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2019-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.