Literature DB >> 27803067

Large-scale Radiomic Profiling of Recurrent Glioblastoma Identifies an Imaging Predictor for Stratifying Anti-Angiogenic Treatment Response.

Philipp Kickingereder1, Michael Götz2, John Muschelli3, Antje Wick4, Ulf Neuberger5, Russell T Shinohara6, Martin Sill7, Martha Nowosielski8, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer9, Alexander Radbruch5,9, Wolfgang Wick4,10, Martin Bendszus5, Klaus H Maier-Hein2, David Bonekamp5,9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Antiangiogenic treatment with bevacizumab, a mAb to the VEGF, is the single most widely used therapeutic agent for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. A major challenge is that there are currently no validated biomarkers that can predict treatment outcome. Here we analyze the potential of radiomics, an emerging field of research that aims to utilize the full potential of medical imaging. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: A total of 4,842 quantitative MRI features were automatically extracted and analyzed from the multiparametric tumor of 172 patients (allocated to a discovery and validation set with a 2:1 ratio) with recurrent glioblastoma prior to bevacizumab treatment. Leveraging a high-throughput approach, radiomic features of patients in the discovery set were subjected to a supervised principal component (superpc) analysis to generate a prediction model for stratifying treatment outcome to antiangiogenic therapy by means of both progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS).
RESULTS: The superpc predictor stratified patients in the discovery set into a low or high risk group for PFS (HR = 1.60; P = 0.017) and OS (HR = 2.14; P < 0.001) and was successfully validated for patients in the validation set (HR = 1.85, P = 0.030 for PFS; HR = 2.60, P = 0.001 for OS).
CONCLUSIONS: Our radiomic-based superpc signature emerges as a putative imaging biomarker for the identification of patients who may derive the most benefit from antiangiogenic therapy, advances the knowledge in the noninvasive characterization of brain tumors, and stresses the role of radiomics as a novel tool for improving decision support in cancer treatment at low cost. Clin Cancer Res; 22(23); 5765-71. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27803067      PMCID: PMC5503450          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  33 in total

1.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Can We Predict Bevacizumab Responders in Patients With Glioblastoma?

Authors:  Tina M Mayer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Evaluating Random Forests for Survival Analysis using Prediction Error Curves.

Authors:  Ulla B Mogensen; Hemant Ishwaran; Thomas A Gerds
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 6.440

4.  Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma.

Authors:  Anoop P Patel; Itay Tirosh; John J Trombetta; Alex K Shalek; Shawn M Gillespie; Hiroaki Wakimoto; Daniel P Cahill; Brian V Nahed; William T Curry; Robert L Martuza; David N Louis; Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen; Mario L Suvà; Aviv Regev; Bradley E Bernstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Assessment of tumor oxygenation and its impact on treatment response in bevacizumab-treated recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  David Bonekamp; Kim Mouridsen; Alexander Radbruch; Felix T Kurz; Oliver Eidel; Antje Wick; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Wolfgang Wick; Martin Bendszus; Leif Østergaard; Philipp Kickingereder
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 6.200

6.  A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Authors:  Mark R Gilbert; James J Dignam; Terri S Armstrong; Jeffrey S Wefel; Deborah T Blumenthal; Michael A Vogelbaum; Howard Colman; Arnab Chakravarti; Stephanie Pugh; Minhee Won; Robert Jeraj; Paul D Brown; Kurt A Jaeckle; David Schiff; Volker W Stieber; David G Brachman; Maria Werner-Wasik; Ivo W Tremont-Lukats; Erik P Sulman; Kenneth D Aldape; Walter J Curran; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Magnetic resonance image features identify glioblastoma phenotypic subtypes with distinct molecular pathway activities.

Authors:  Haruka Itakura; Achal S Achrol; Lex A Mitchell; Joshua J Loya; Tiffany Liu; Erick M Westbroek; Abdullah H Feroze; Scott Rodriguez; Sebastian Echegaray; Tej D Azad; Kristen W Yeom; Sandy Napel; Daniel L Rubin; Steven D Chang; Griffith R Harsh; Olivier Gevaert
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 17.956

8.  Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Teri N Kreisl; Lyndon Kim; Kraig Moore; Paul Duic; Cheryl Royce; Irene Stroud; Nancy Garren; Megan Mackey; John A Butman; Kevin Camphausen; John Park; Paul S Albert; Howard A Fine
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Semi-supervised methods to predict patient survival from gene expression data.

Authors:  Eric Bair; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-04-13       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Statistical normalization techniques for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Russell T Shinohara; Elizabeth M Sweeney; Jeff Goldsmith; Navid Shiee; Farrah J Mateen; Peter A Calabresi; Samson Jarso; Dzung L Pham; Daniel S Reich; Ciprian M Crainiceanu
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.881

View more
  100 in total

1.  Relaxation-compensated amide proton transfer (APT) MRI signal intensity is associated with survival and progression in high-grade glioma patients.

Authors:  Daniel Paech; Constantin Dreher; Sebastian Regnery; Jan-Eric Meissner; Steffen Goerke; Johannes Windschuh; Johanna Oberhollenzer; Miriam Schultheiss; Katerina Deike-Hofmann; Sebastian Bickelhaupt; Alexander Radbruch; Moritz Zaiss; Andreas Unterberg; Wolfgang Wick; Martin Bendszus; Peter Bachert; Mark E Ladd; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Radiomics in peritumoral non-enhancing regions: fractional anisotropy and cerebral blood volume improve prediction of local progression and overall survival in patients with glioblastoma.

Authors:  Jung Youn Kim; Min Jae Yoon; Ji Eun Park; Eun Jung Choi; Jongho Lee; Ho Sung Kim
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Quality of science and reporting of radiomics in oncologic studies: room for improvement according to radiomics quality score and TRIPOD statement.

Authors:  Ji Eun Park; Donghyun Kim; Ho Sung Kim; Seo Young Park; Jung Youn Kim; Se Jin Cho; Jae Ho Shin; Jeong Hoon Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Radiomics nomogram for predicting the malignant potential of gastrointestinal stromal tumours preoperatively.

Authors:  Tao Chen; Zhenyuan Ning; Lili Xu; Xingyu Feng; Shuai Han; Holger R Roth; Wei Xiong; Xixi Zhao; Yanfeng Hu; Hao Liu; Jiang Yu; Yu Zhang; Yong Li; Yikai Xu; Kensaku Mori; Guoxin Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Radiomics Analysis of PET and CT Components of PET/CT Imaging Integrated with Clinical Parameters: Application to Prognosis for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Wenbing Lv; Qingyu Yuan; Quanshi Wang; Jianhua Ma; Qianjin Feng; Wufan Chen; Arman Rahmim; Lijun Lu
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Invasive ductal breast cancer: preoperative predict Ki-67 index based on radiomics of ADC maps.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Yifeng Zhu; Kai Zhang; Yajie Liu; Jingjing Cui; Juan Tao; Yingzi Wang; Shaowu Wang
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Preoperative prediction of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer based on radiomics of T2-weighted fat-suppression and diffusion-weighted MRI.

Authors:  Yuhao Dong; Qianjin Feng; Wei Yang; Zixiao Lu; Chunyan Deng; Lu Zhang; Zhouyang Lian; Jing Liu; Xiaoning Luo; Shufang Pei; Xiaokai Mo; Wenhui Huang; Changhong Liang; Bin Zhang; Shuixing Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  An Update on the Approach to the Imaging of Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Katherine M Mullen; Raymond Y Huang
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 9.  Novel imaging techniques of rectal cancer: what do radiomics and radiogenomics have to offer? A literature review.

Authors:  Natally Horvat; David D B Bates; Iva Petkovska
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2019-11

10.  Radiomic features predict Ki-67 expression level and survival in lower grade gliomas.

Authors:  Yiming Li; Zenghui Qian; Kaibin Xu; Kai Wang; Xing Fan; Shaowu Li; Xing Liu; Yinyan Wang; Tao Jiang
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.