Literature DB >> 26348233

Prognostic Imaging Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: Development and Independent Validation on the Basis of Multiregion and Quantitative Analysis of MR Images.

Yi Cui1, Khin Khin Tha1, Shunsuke Terasaka1, Shigeru Yamaguchi1, Jeff Wang1, Kohsuke Kudo1, Lei Xing1, Hiroki Shirato1, Ruijiang Li1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and independently validate prognostic imaging biomarkers for predicting survival in patients with glioblastoma on the basis of multiregion quantitative image analysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the local institutional review board, and informed consent was waived. A total of 79 patients from two independent cohorts were included. The discovery and validation cohorts consisted of 46 and 33 patients with glioblastoma from the Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) and the local institution, respectively. Preoperative T1-weighted contrast material-enhanced and T2-weighted fluid-attenuation inversion recovery magnetic resonance (MR) images were analyzed. For each patient, we semiautomatically delineated the tumor and performed automated intratumor segmentation, dividing the tumor into spatially distinct subregions that demonstrate coherent intensity patterns across multiparametric MR imaging. Within each subregion and for the entire tumor, we extracted quantitative imaging features, including those that fully capture the differential contrast of multimodality MR imaging. A multivariate sparse Cox regression model was trained by using TCIA data and tested on the validation cohort.
RESULTS: The optimal prognostic model identified five imaging biomarkers that quantified tumor surface area and intensity distributions of the tumor and its subregions. In the validation cohort, our prognostic model achieved a concordance index of 0.67 and significant stratification of overall survival by using the log-rank test (P = .018), which outperformed conventional prognostic factors, such as age (concordance index, 0.57; P = .389) and tumor volume (concordance index, 0.59; P = .409).
CONCLUSION: The multiregion analysis presented here establishes a general strategy to effectively characterize intratumor heterogeneity manifested at multimodality imaging and has the potential to reveal useful prognostic imaging biomarkers in glioblastoma. © RSNA, 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26348233      PMCID: PMC4734164          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015150358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  29 in total

1.  Scale to predict survival after surgery for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  John K Park; Tiffany Hodges; Leopold Arko; Michael Shen; Donna Dello Iacono; Adrian McNabb; Nancy Olsen Bailey; Teri Nguyen Kreisl; Fabio M Iwamoto; Joohee Sul; Sungyoung Auh; Grace E Park; Howard A Fine; Peter McL Black
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Prognostic significance of preoperative MRI scans in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  M A Hammoud; R Sawaya; W Shi; P F Thall; N E Leeds
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Data-driven grading of brain gliomas: a multiparametric MR imaging study.

Authors:  Massimo Caulo; Valentina Panara; Domenico Tortora; Peter A Mattei; Chiara Briganti; Emanuele Pravatà; Simone Salice; Antonio R Cotroneo; Armando Tartaro
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma.

Authors:  Anoop P Patel; Itay Tirosh; John J Trombetta; Alex K Shalek; Shawn M Gillespie; Hiroaki Wakimoto; Daniel P Cahill; Brian V Nahed; William T Curry; Robert L Martuza; David N Louis; Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen; Mario L Suvà; Aviv Regev; Bradley E Bernstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Intratumor heterogeneity in human glioblastoma reflects cancer evolutionary dynamics.

Authors:  Andrea Sottoriva; Inmaculada Spiteri; Sara G M Piccirillo; Anestis Touloumis; V Peter Collins; John C Marioni; Christina Curtis; Colin Watts; Simon Tavaré
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository.

Authors:  Kenneth Clark; Bruce Vendt; Kirk Smith; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Paul Koppel; Stephen Moore; Stanley Phillips; David Maffitt; Michael Pringle; Lawrence Tarbox; Fred Prior
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  MR imaging predictors of molecular profile and survival: multi-institutional study of the TCGA glioblastoma data set.

Authors:  David A Gutman; Lee A D Cooper; Scott N Hwang; Chad A Holder; Jingjing Gao; Tarun D Aurora; William D Dunn; Lisa Scarpace; Tom Mikkelsen; Rajan Jain; Max Wintermark; Manal Jilwan; Prashant Raghavan; Erich Huang; Robert J Clifford; Pattanasak Mongkolwat; Vladimir Kleper; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Pascal O Zinn; Carlos S Moreno; Carl Jaffe; Rivka Colen; Daniel L Rubin; Joel Saltz; Adam Flanders; Daniel J Brat
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Quantitative imaging in cancer evolution and ecology.

Authors:  Robert A Gatenby; Olya Grove; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Radiogenomic mapping of edema/cellular invasion MRI-phenotypes in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Pascal O Zinn; Bhanu Mahajan; Bhanu Majadan; Pratheesh Sathyan; Sanjay K Singh; Sadhan Majumder; Ferenc A Jolesz; Rivka R Colen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS).

Authors:  Bjoern H Menze; Andras Jakab; Stefan Bauer; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Keyvan Farahani; Justin Kirby; Yuliya Burren; Nicole Porz; Johannes Slotboom; Roland Wiest; Levente Lanczi; Elizabeth Gerstner; Marc-André Weber; Tal Arbel; Brian B Avants; Nicholas Ayache; Patricia Buendia; D Louis Collins; Nicolas Cordier; Jason J Corso; Antonio Criminisi; Tilak Das; Hervé Delingette; Çağatay Demiralp; Christopher R Durst; Michel Dojat; Senan Doyle; Joana Festa; Florence Forbes; Ezequiel Geremia; Ben Glocker; Polina Golland; Xiaotao Guo; Andac Hamamci; Khan M Iftekharuddin; Raj Jena; Nigel M John; Ender Konukoglu; Danial Lashkari; José Antonió Mariz; Raphael Meier; Sérgio Pereira; Doina Precup; Stephen J Price; Tammy Riklin Raviv; Syed M S Reza; Michael Ryan; Duygu Sarikaya; Lawrence Schwartz; Hoo-Chang Shin; Jamie Shotton; Carlos A Silva; Nuno Sousa; Nagesh K Subbanna; Gabor Szekely; Thomas J Taylor; Owen M Thomas; Nicholas J Tustison; Gozde Unal; Flor Vasseur; Max Wintermark; Dong Hye Ye; Liang Zhao; Binsheng Zhao; Darko Zikic; Marcel Prastawa; Mauricio Reyes; Koen Van Leemput
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  40 in total

1.  Brain Tumor-Enhancement Visualization and Morphometric Assessment: A Comparison of MPRAGE, SPACE, and VIBE MRI Techniques.

Authors:  L Danieli; G C Riccitelli; D Distefano; E Prodi; E Ventura; A Cianfoni; A Kaelin-Lang; M Reinert; E Pravatà
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Tumor Subregion Evolution-Based Imaging Features to Assess Early Response and Predict Prognosis in Oropharyngeal Cancer.

Authors:  Jia Wu; Michael F Gensheimer; Nasha Zhang; Meiying Guo; Rachel Liang; Carrie Zhang; Nancy Fischbein; Erqi L Pollom; Beth Beadle; Quynh-Thu Le; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Morphologic Features on MR Imaging Classify Multifocal Glioblastomas in Different Prognostic Groups.

Authors:  J Pérez-Beteta; D Molina-García; M Villena; M J Rodríguez; C Velásquez; J Martino; B Meléndez-Asensio; Á Rodríguez de Lope; R Morcillo; J M Sepúlveda; A Hernández-Laín; A Ramos; J A Barcia; P C Lara; D Albillo; A Revert; E Arana; V M Pérez-García
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Relationship between Glioblastoma Heterogeneity and Survival Time: An MR Imaging Texture Analysis.

Authors:  Y Liu; X Xu; L Yin; X Zhang; L Li; H Lu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Algorithmic three-dimensional analysis of tumor shape in MRI improves prognosis of survival in glioblastoma: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Nicholas Czarnek; Kal Clark; Katherine B Peters; Maciej A Mazurowski
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Clinical parameters outweigh diffusion- and perfusion-derived MRI parameters in predicting survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Authors:  Sina Burth; Philipp Kickingereder; Oliver Eidel; Diana Tichy; David Bonekamp; Lukas Weberling; Antje Wick; Sarah Löw; Anne Hertenstein; Martha Nowosielski; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Wolfgang Wick; Martin Bendszus; Alexander Radbruch
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  Intratumor partitioning and texture analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI identifies relevant tumor subregions to predict pathological response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jia Wu; Guanghua Gong; Yi Cui; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Radiomic subtyping improves disease stratification beyond key molecular, clinical, and standard imaging characteristics in patients with glioblastoma.

Authors:  Philipp Kickingereder; Ulf Neuberger; David Bonekamp; Paula L Piechotta; Michael Götz; Antje Wick; Martin Sill; Annekathrin Kratz; Russell T Shinohara; David T W Jones; Alexander Radbruch; John Muschelli; Andreas Unterberg; Jürgen Debus; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Christel Herold-Mende; Stefan Pfister; Andreas von Deimling; Wolfgang Wick; David Capper; Klaus H Maier-Hein; Martin Bendszus
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  Prediction of survival with multi-scale radiomic analysis in glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Ahmad Chaddad; Siham Sabri; Tamim Niazi; Bassam Abdulkarim
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Multi-Channel 3D Deep Feature Learning for Survival Time Prediction of Brain Tumor Patients Using Multi-Modal Neuroimages.

Authors:  Dong Nie; Junfeng Lu; Han Zhang; Ehsan Adeli; Jun Wang; Zhengda Yu; LuYan Liu; Qian Wang; Jinsong Wu; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.