Literature DB >> 31289886

Radiomics in peritumoral non-enhancing regions: fractional anisotropy and cerebral blood volume improve prediction of local progression and overall survival in patients with glioblastoma.

Jung Youn Kim1, Min Jae Yoon2, Ji Eun Park3, Eun Jung Choi4, Jongho Lee4, Ho Sung Kim5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The peritumoral non-enhancing region (NER) is frequently not removed during the surgical resection of glioblastoma, with most recurrences occurring within the original treatment field. This study determined whether radiomics analysis of the NER can predict local recurrence and overall survival in patients with glioblastoma.
METHODS: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans from 83 consecutive patients with glioblastoma were retrospectively reviewed and grouped into training (n = 59) and test sets (n = 24). A total of 6472 radiomic features were extracted from contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images and from fractional anisotropy (FA) and normalized cerebral blood volume (CBV) maps. A diagnostic model to predict 6-month progression was tested using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and compared with the single parameters of FA and CBV. A survival model was tested using Harrell's C-index and compared with clinical models that included age, sex, Karnofsky performance score, and extent of surgical resection.
RESULTS: Four FA features and six CBV features were selected for the diagnostic model; no features were extracted from conventional MRI. Combined FA and CBV radiomics showed better predictive value for local progression (AUC, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67-0.90) than single imaging radiomics (AUC, 0.70-0.76) or single imaging parameters (AUC, 0.51-0.54). The combined model (C-index, 0.87) improved prognostication when added to clinical models (C-index, 0.72).
CONCLUSION: Radiomics features using FA and CBV in the NER have the potential to improve prediction of local progression and overall survival in patients with glioblastoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anisotropy; Disease progression; Glioblastoma; Perfusion imaging; Survival analysis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31289886     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-019-02255-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  45 in total

1.  Influence of MRI acquisition protocols and image intensity normalization methods on texture classification.

Authors:  G Collewet; M Strzelecki; F Mariette
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Penalized Cox regression analysis in the high-dimensional and low-sample size settings, with applications to microarray gene expression data.

Authors:  Jiang Gui; Hongzhe Li
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Adult glioblastoma multiforme survival in the temozolomide era: a population-based analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries.

Authors:  Amy S Darefsky; Joseph T King; Robert Dubrow
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  MRI features predict survival and molecular markers in diffuse lower-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Hao Zhou; Martin Vallières; Harrison X Bai; Chang Su; Haiyun Tang; Derek Oldridge; Zishu Zhang; Bo Xiao; Weihua Liao; Yongguang Tao; Jianhua Zhou; Paul Zhang; Li Yang
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  DTI and PWI analysis of peri-enhancing tumoral brain tissue in patients treated for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Alessandro Stecco; Carla Pisani; Raffaella Quarta; Marco Brambilla; Laura Masini; Debora Beldì; Sara Zizzari; Rita Fossaceca; Marco Krengli; Alessandro Carriero
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-07-25       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Prognostic significance of intracranial dissemination of glioblastoma multiforme in adults.

Authors:  Andrew T Parsa; Scott Wachhorst; Kathleen R Lamborn; Michael D Prados; Michael W McDermott; Mitchel S Berger; Susan M Chang
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Multiparametric tissue characterization of brain neoplasms and their recurrence using pattern classification of MR images.

Authors:  Ragini Verma; Evangelia I Zacharaki; Yangming Ou; Hongmin Cai; Sanjeev Chawla; Seung-Koo Lee; Elias R Melhem; Ronald Wolf; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Incorporating diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI into a radiomics model improves diagnostic performance for pseudoprogression in glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Jung Youn Kim; Ji Eun Park; Youngheun Jo; Woo Hyun Shim; Soo Jung Nam; Jeong Hoon Kim; Roh-Eul Yoo; Seung Hong Choi; Ho Sung Kim
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  Statistical normalization techniques for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Russell T Shinohara; Elizabeth M Sweeney; Jeff Goldsmith; Navid Shiee; Farrah J Mateen; Peter A Calabresi; Samson Jarso; Dzung L Pham; Daniel S Reich; Ciprian M Crainiceanu
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.881

10.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data.

Authors:  Robert J Gillies; Paul E Kinahan; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  5 in total

1.  Radiomics-based neural network predicts recurrence patterns in glioblastoma using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Ka Young Shim; Sung Won Chung; Jae Hak Jeong; Inpyeong Hwang; Chul-Kee Park; Tae Min Kim; Sung-Hye Park; Jae Kyung Won; Joo Ho Lee; Soon-Tae Lee; Roh-Eul Yoo; Koung Mi Kang; Tae Jin Yun; Ji-Hoon Kim; Chul-Ho Sohn; Kyu Sung Choi; Seung Hong Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Advanced Imaging Techniques for Differentiating Pseudoprogression and Tumor Recurrence After Immunotherapy for Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Yan Li; Yiqi Ma; Zijun Wu; Ruoxi Xie; Fanxin Zeng; Huawei Cai; Su Lui; Bin Song; Lei Chen; Min Wu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 7.561

3.  Imaging Biomarkers of Glioblastoma Treatment Response: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Recent Machine Learning Studies.

Authors:  Thomas C Booth; Mariusz Grzeda; Alysha Chelliah; Andrei Roman; Ayisha Al Busaidi; Carmen Dragos; Haris Shuaib; Aysha Luis; Ayesha Mirchandani; Burcu Alparslan; Nina Mansoor; Jose Lavrador; Francesco Vergani; Keyoumars Ashkan; Marc Modat; Sebastien Ourselin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  A Neural Network Approach to Identify the Peritumoral Invasive Areas in Glioblastoma Patients by Using MR Radiomics.

Authors:  Jiun-Lin Yan; Chao Li; Anouk van der Hoorn; Natalie R Boonzaier; Tomasz Matys; Stephen J Price
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Applications of radiomics and machine learning for radiotherapy of malignant brain tumors.

Authors:  Martin Kocher; Maximilian I Ruge; Norbert Galldiks; Philipp Lohmann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.033

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.