Dalu Yang1, Ganesh Rao2, Juan Martinez2, Ashok Veeraraghavan3, Arvind Rao1. 1. Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030. 3. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain cancer. Four molecular subtypes of GBM have been described but can only be determined by an invasive brain biopsy. The goal of this study is to evaluate the utility of texture features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans as a potential noninvasive method to characterize molecular subtypes of GBM and to predict 12-month overall survival status for GBM patients. METHODS: The authors manually segmented the tumor regions from postcontrast T1 weighted and T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI scans of 82 patients with de novo GBM. For each patient, the authors extracted five sets of computer-extracted texture features, namely, 48 segmentation-based fractal texture analysis (SFTA) features, 576 histogram of oriented gradients (HOGs) features, 44 run-length matrix (RLM) features, 256 local binary patterns features, and 52 Haralick features, from the tumor slice corresponding to the maximum tumor area in axial, sagittal, and coronal planes, respectively. The authors used an ensemble classifier called random forest on each feature family to predict GBM molecular subtypes and 12-month survival status (a dichotomized version of overall survival at the 12-month time point indicating if the patient was alive or not at 12 months). The performance of the prediction was quantified and compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: With the appropriate combination of texture feature set, image plane (axial, coronal, or sagittal), and MRI sequence, the area under ROC curve values for predicting different molecular subtypes and 12-month survival status are 0.72 for classical (with Haralick features on T1 postcontrast axial scan), 0.70 for mesenchymal (with HOG features on T2 FLAIR axial scan), 0.75 for neural (with RLM features on T2 FLAIR axial scan), 0.82 for proneural (with SFTA features on T1 postcontrast coronal scan), and 0.69 for 12-month survival status (with SFTA features on T1 postcontrast coronal scan). CONCLUSIONS: The authors evaluated the performance of five types of texture features in predicting GBM molecular subtypes and 12-month survival status. The authors' results show that texture features are predictive of molecular subtypes and survival status in GBM. These results indicate the feasibility of using tumor-derived imaging features to guide genomically informed interventions without the need for invasive biopsies.
PURPOSE:Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain cancer. Four molecular subtypes of GBM have been described but can only be determined by an invasive brain biopsy. The goal of this study is to evaluate the utility of texture features extracted from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans as a potential noninvasive method to characterize molecular subtypes of GBM and to predict 12-month overall survival status for GBM patients. METHODS: The authors manually segmented the tumor regions from postcontrast T1 weighted and T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI scans of 82 patients with de novo GBM. For each patient, the authors extracted five sets of computer-extracted texture features, namely, 48 segmentation-based fractal texture analysis (SFTA) features, 576 histogram of oriented gradients (HOGs) features, 44 run-length matrix (RLM) features, 256 local binary patterns features, and 52 Haralick features, from the tumor slice corresponding to the maximum tumor area in axial, sagittal, and coronal planes, respectively. The authors used an ensemble classifier called random forest on each feature family to predict GBM molecular subtypes and 12-month survival status (a dichotomized version of overall survival at the 12-month time point indicating if the patient was alive or not at 12 months). The performance of the prediction was quantified and compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: With the appropriate combination of texture feature set, image plane (axial, coronal, or sagittal), and MRI sequence, the area under ROC curve values for predicting different molecular subtypes and 12-month survival status are 0.72 for classical (with Haralick features on T1 postcontrast axial scan), 0.70 for mesenchymal (with HOG features on T2 FLAIR axial scan), 0.75 for neural (with RLM features on T2 FLAIR axial scan), 0.82 for proneural (with SFTA features on T1 postcontrast coronal scan), and 0.69 for 12-month survival status (with SFTA features on T1 postcontrast coronal scan). CONCLUSIONS: The authors evaluated the performance of five types of texture features in predicting GBM molecular subtypes and 12-month survival status. The authors' results show that texture features are predictive of molecular subtypes and survival status in GBM. These results indicate the feasibility of using tumor-derived imaging features to guide genomically informed interventions without the need for invasive biopsies.
Authors: Elizabeth J Sutton; Jung Hun Oh; Brittany Z Dashevsky; Harini Veeraraghavan; Aditya P Apte; Sunitha B Thakur; Joseph O Deasy; Elizabeth A Morris Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-04-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Anoop P Patel; Itay Tirosh; John J Trombetta; Alex K Shalek; Shawn M Gillespie; Hiroaki Wakimoto; Daniel P Cahill; Brian V Nahed; William T Curry; Robert L Martuza; David N Louis; Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen; Mario L Suvà; Aviv Regev; Bradley E Bernstein Journal: Science Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Mu Zhou; Lawrence Hall; Dmitry Goldgof; Robin Russo; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Robert Gillies; Robert Gatenby Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2014-02-01 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Jason Yuen; Cannon X L Zhu; Danny T M Chan; Rebecca Y T Ng; Wai Nia; Wai Sang Poon; Ho Keung Ng; Vincent C T Mok; Laurence K S Wong; Tom C Y Cheung; Deyond Y W Siu Journal: Stereotact Funct Neurosurg Date: 2014-05-10 Impact factor: 1.875
Authors: Mieke Kriege; Cecile T M Brekelmans; Carla Boetes; Peter E Besnard; Harmine M Zonderland; Inge Marie Obdeijn; Radu A Manoliu; Theo Kok; Hans Peterse; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst; Sara H Muller; Sybren Meijer; Jan C Oosterwijk; Louk V A M Beex; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Harry J de Koning; Emiel J T Rutgers; Jan G M Klijn Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-07-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David A Gutman; Lee A D Cooper; Scott N Hwang; Chad A Holder; Jingjing Gao; Tarun D Aurora; William D Dunn; Lisa Scarpace; Tom Mikkelsen; Rajan Jain; Max Wintermark; Manal Jilwan; Prashant Raghavan; Erich Huang; Robert J Clifford; Pattanasak Mongkolwat; Vladimir Kleper; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Pascal O Zinn; Carlos S Moreno; Carl Jaffe; Rivka Colen; Daniel L Rubin; Joel Saltz; Adam Flanders; Daniel J Brat Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: P Tiwari; P Prasanna; L Wolansky; M Pinho; M Cohen; A P Nayate; A Gupta; G Singh; K J Hatanpaa; A Sloan; L Rogers; A Madabhushi Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: David Molina; Julián Pérez-Beteta; Belén Luque; Elena Arregui; Manuel Calvo; José M Borrás; Carlos López; Juan Martino; Carlos Velasquez; Beatriz Asenjo; Manuel Benavides; Ismael Herruzo; Alicia Martínez-González; Luis Pérez-Romasanta; Estanislao Arana; Víctor M Pérez-García Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2016-06-20 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Philipp Kickingereder; Ulf Neuberger; David Bonekamp; Paula L Piechotta; Michael Götz; Antje Wick; Martin Sill; Annekathrin Kratz; Russell T Shinohara; David T W Jones; Alexander Radbruch; John Muschelli; Andreas Unterberg; Jürgen Debus; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Christel Herold-Mende; Stefan Pfister; Andreas von Deimling; Wolfgang Wick; David Capper; Klaus H Maier-Hein; Martin Bendszus Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2018-05-18 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Monika Béresová; Andrés Larroza; Estanislao Arana; József Varga; László Balkay; David Moratal Journal: MAGMA Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Leland S Hu; Shuluo Ning; Jennifer M Eschbacher; Leslie C Baxter; Nathan Gaw; Sara Ranjbar; Jonathan Plasencia; Amylou C Dueck; Sen Peng; Kris A Smith; Peter Nakaji; John P Karis; C Chad Quarles; Teresa Wu; Joseph C Loftus; Robert B Jenkins; Hugues Sicotte; Thomas M Kollmeyer; Brian P O'Neill; William Elmquist; Joseph M Hoxworth; David Frakes; Jann Sarkaria; Kristin R Swanson; Nhan L Tran; Jing Li; J Ross Mitchell Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2016-08-08 Impact factor: 12.300