PURPOSE: In this study, we propose a rapid acquisition for MR-based attenuation correction (MRAC) in positron emission tomography (PET)/MR imaging, in which an ultrashort echo time (UTE) image and an out-of-phase echo image are obtained within a single rapid scan (35 s) at high spatial resolution (1 mm3 ), which allows accurate estimation of a pseudo CT image using 4-class tissue classification (discrete bone, discrete air, continuous fat, and continuous water). METHODS: In dual-echo ramped hybrid encoding (dRHE), a UTE echo is directly followed by a second out-of-phase echo, in which hybrid spatial encoding combining single-point imaging and 3-dimensional radial frequency encoding is used to improve the quality of both images. Two-point Dixon reconstruction is used to estimate fat- and water-separated images, and UTE images are used to estimate bone. Air and bone segmentation is improved by using multiple UTE images with an advanced hybrid-encoding scheme that allows reconstruction of multiple UTE images. To evaluate the proposed method, dRHE-MRAC PET/MR brain imaging was performed in 10 subjects. Dice coefficients and PET reconstruction errors relative to CT-based attenuation correction were compared with existing system MRAC approaches. RESULTS: In dRHE-MRAC, the Dice coefficients for soft tissue, air, and bone were respectively 0.95 ± 0.01, 0.62 ± 0.06, and 0.78 ± 0.05, which was a significantly improved result compared with existing approaches. In most brain regions, dRHE-MRAC showed significantly reduced PET error (less than 1%) with P values less than 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Dual-echo ramped hybrid encoding enables rapid and robust imaging for MRAC with a very rapid acquisition. Magn Reson Med 79:2912-2922, 2018.
PURPOSE: In this study, we propose a rapid acquisition for MR-based attenuation correction (MRAC) in positron emission tomography (PET)/MR imaging, in which an ultrashort echo time (UTE) image and an out-of-phase echo image are obtained within a single rapid scan (35 s) at high spatial resolution (1 mm3 ), which allows accurate estimation of a pseudo CT image using 4-class tissue classification (discrete bone, discrete air, continuous fat, and continuous water). METHODS: In dual-echo ramped hybrid encoding (dRHE), a UTE echo is directly followed by a second out-of-phase echo, in which hybrid spatial encoding combining single-point imaging and 3-dimensional radial frequency encoding is used to improve the quality of both images. Two-point Dixon reconstruction is used to estimate fat- and water-separated images, and UTE images are used to estimate bone. Air and bone segmentation is improved by using multiple UTE images with an advanced hybrid-encoding scheme that allows reconstruction of multiple UTE images. To evaluate the proposed method, dRHE-MRAC PET/MR brain imaging was performed in 10 subjects. Dice coefficients and PET reconstruction errors relative to CT-based attenuation correction were compared with existing system MRAC approaches. RESULTS: In dRHE-MRAC, the Dice coefficients for soft tissue, air, and bone were respectively 0.95 ± 0.01, 0.62 ± 0.06, and 0.78 ± 0.05, which was a significantly improved result compared with existing approaches. In most brain regions, dRHE-MRAC showed significantly reduced PET error (less than 1%) with P values less than 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Dual-echo ramped hybrid encoding enables rapid and robust imaging for MRAC with a very rapid acquisition. Magn Reson Med 79:2912-2922, 2018.
Authors: Eduard Schreibmann; Jonathon A Nye; David M Schuster; Diego R Martin; John Votaw; Tim Fox Journal: Med Phys Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Vincent Keereman; Yves Fierens; Tom Broux; Yves De Deene; Max Lonneux; Stefaan Vandenberghe Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Ciprian Catana; Andre van der Kouwe; Thomas Benner; Christian J Michel; Michael Hamm; Matthias Fenchel; Bruce Fischl; Bruce Rosen; Matthias Schmand; A Gregory Sorensen Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Ian B Malone; Richard E Ansorge; Guy B Williams; Peter J Nestor; T Adrian Carpenter; Tim D Fryer Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Axel Martinez-Möller; Michael Souvatzoglou; Gaspar Delso; Ralph A Bundschuh; Christophe Chefd'hotel; Sibylle I Ziegler; Nassir Navab; Markus Schwaiger; Stephan G Nekolla Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-03-16 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Li Feng; Robert Grimm; Kai Tobias Block; Hersh Chandarana; Sungheon Kim; Jian Xu; Leon Axel; Daniel K Sodickson; Ricardo Otazo Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Hyunyeol Lee; Xia Zhao; Hee Kwon Song; Rosaline Zhang; Scott P Bartlett; Felix W Wehrli Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-12-18 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Hyungseok Jang; Yajun Ma; Adam C Searleman; Michael Carl; Jody Corey-Bloom; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Hyungseok Jang; Alan B McMillan; Yajun Ma; Saeed Jerban; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du; Richard Kijowski Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Paul Kyu Han; Debra E Horng; Kuang Gong; Yoann Petibon; Kyungsang Kim; Quanzheng Li; Keith A Johnson; Georges El Fakhri; Jinsong Ouyang; Chao Ma Journal: Med Phys Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Hyungseok Jang; Xing Lu; Michael Carl; Adam C Searleman; Saeed Jerban; Yajun Ma; Annette von Drygalski; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-10-16 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Hyungseok Jang; Michael Carl; Yajun Ma; Adam C Searleman; Saeed Jerban; Eric Y Chang; Jody Corey-Bloom; Jiang Du Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2020-05