Literature DB >> 20810759

Toward implementing an MRI-based PET attenuation-correction method for neurologic studies on the MR-PET brain prototype.

Ciprian Catana1, Andre van der Kouwe, Thomas Benner, Christian J Michel, Michael Hamm, Matthias Fenchel, Bruce Fischl, Bruce Rosen, Matthias Schmand, A Gregory Sorensen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Several factors have to be considered for implementing an accurate attenuation-correction (AC) method in a combined MR-PET scanner. In this work, some of these challenges were investigated, and an AC method based entirely on the MRI data obtained with a single dedicated sequence was developed and used for neurologic studies performed with the MR-PET human brain scanner prototype.
METHODS: The focus was on the problem of bone-air segmentation, selection of the linear attenuation coefficient for bone, and positioning of the radiofrequency coil. The impact of these factors on PET data quantification was studied in simulations and experimental measurements performed on the combined MR-PET scanner. A novel dual-echo ultrashort echo time (DUTE) MRI sequence was proposed for head imaging. Simultaneous MR-PET data were acquired, and the PET images reconstructed using the proposed DUTE MRI-based AC method were compared with the PET images that had been reconstructed using a CT-based AC method.
RESULTS: Our data suggest that incorrectly accounting for the bone tissue attenuation can lead to large underestimations (>20%) of the radiotracer concentration in the cortex. Assigning a linear attenuation coefficient of 0.143 or 0.151 cm(-1) to bone tissue appears to give the best trade-off between bias and variability in the resulting images. Not identifying the internal air cavities introduces large overestimations (>20%) in adjacent structures. On the basis of these results, the segmented CT AC method was established as the silver standard for the segmented MRI-based AC method. For an integrated MR-PET scanner, in particular, ignoring the radiofrequency coil attenuation can cause large underestimations (i.e., <or=50%) in the reconstructed images. Furthermore, the coil location in the PET field of view has to be accurately known. High-quality bone-air segmentation can be performed using the DUTE data. The PET images obtained using the DUTE MRI- and CT-based AC methods compare favorably in most of the brain structures.
CONCLUSION: A DUTE MRI-based AC method considering all these factors was implemented. Preliminary results suggest that this method could potentially be as accurate as the segmented CT method and could be used for quantitative neurologic MR-PET studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20810759      PMCID: PMC3801218          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.069112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  18 in total

1.  Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain.

Authors:  Bruce Fischl; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Marilyn Albert; Megan Dieterich; Christian Haselgrove; Andre van der Kouwe; Ron Killiany; David Kennedy; Shuna Klaveness; Albert Montillo; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging-guided attenuation and scatter corrections in three-dimensional brain positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Marie-Louise Montandon; Daniel O Slosman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners.

Authors:  Paul E Kinahan; Bruce H Hasegawa; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.446

4.  Sequence-independent segmentation of magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Bruce Fischl; David H Salat; André J W van der Kouwe; Nikos Makris; Florent Ségonne; Brian T Quinn; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Determination of object contour from projections for attenuation correction in cranial positron emission tomography.

Authors:  M Bergström; J Litton; L Eriksson; C Bohm; G Blomqvist
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Atlas-guided non-uniform attenuation correction in cerebral 3D PET imaging.

Authors:  Marie-Louise Montandon; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-01-17       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Online brain attenuation correction in PET: towards a fully automated data handling in a clinical environment.

Authors:  C Michel; A Bol; A G De Volder; A M Goffinet
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1989

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging of cortical bone with ultrashort TE pulse sequences.

Authors:  Ines L H Reichert; Matthew D Robson; Peter D Gatehouse; Taigang He; Karyn E Chappell; Joanne Holmes; Samia Girgis; Graeme M Bydder
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  Automated PET attenuation correction model for functional brain imaging.

Authors:  B T Weinzapfel; G D Hutchins
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Simultaneous MR/PET imaging of the human brain: feasibility study.

Authors:  Heinz-Peter W Schlemmer; Bernd J Pichler; Matthias Schmand; Ziad Burbar; Christian Michel; Ralf Ladebeck; Kirstin Jattke; David Townsend; Claude Nahmias; Pradeep K Jacob; Wolf-Dieter Heiss; Claus D Claussen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  132 in total

1.  Review. The Agfa Mayneord lecture: MRI of short and ultrashort T₂ and T₂* components of tissues, fluids and materials using clinical systems.

Authors:  G M Bydder
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Molecular characterization of rheumatoid arthritis with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Gu; Linda Nguyen; Abhijit J Chaudhari; John D MacKenzie
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-04

3.  Imaging Agonist-Induced D2/D3 Receptor Desensitization and Internalization In Vivo with PET/fMRI.

Authors:  Christin Y Sander; Jacob M Hooker; Ciprian Catana; Bruce R Rosen; Joseph B Mandeville
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 4.  MRI-only treatment planning: benefits and challenges.

Authors:  Amir M Owrangi; Peter B Greer; Carri K Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Investigation of a method for generating synthetic CT models from MRI scans of the head and neck for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Shu-Hui Hsu; Yue Cao; Ke Huang; Mary Feng; James M Balter
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Improvement of attenuation correction in time-of-flight PET/MR imaging with a positron-emitting source.

Authors:  Pieter Mollet; Vincent Keereman; Jason Bini; David Izquierdo-Garcia; Zahi A Fayad; Stefaan Vandenberghe
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Accurate PET/MR quantification using time of flight MLAA image reconstruction.

Authors:  R Boellaard; M B M Hofman; O S Hoekstra; A A Lammertsma
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 8.  Positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging: technical review.

Authors:  Raymond F Muzic; Frank P DiFilippo
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 0.800

9.  On the accuracy and reproducibility of a novel probabilistic atlas-based generation for calculation of head attenuation maps on integrated PET/MR scanners.

Authors:  Kevin T Chen; David Izquierdo-Garcia; Clare B Poynton; Daniel B Chonde; Ciprian Catana
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  PET and MR imaging: the odd couple or a match made in heaven?

Authors:  Ciprian Catana; Alexander R Guimaraes; Bruce R Rosen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.