PURPOSE: In ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging, fat suppression can improve short T2 * contrast but can also reduce short T2 * signals. The conventional two-point Dixon (2p-Dixon) method does not perform well due to short T2 * decay. In this study, we propose a new method to suppress fat for high contrast UTE imaging of short T2 tissues, utilizing a single-point Dixon (1p-Dixon) method. METHODS: The proposed method utilizes dual-echo UTE imaging, where UTE is followed by the second TE, chosen flexibly. Fat is estimated by applying a 1p-Dixon method to the non-UTE image after correction of phase errors, which is used to suppress fat in the UTE image. In vivo ankle and knee imaging were performed at 3 T to evaluate the proposed method. RESULT: It was observed that fat and water signals in tendons were misestimated by the 2p-Dixon method due to signal decay, while the 1p-Dixon method showed reliable fat and water separation not affected by the short T2 * signal decay. Compared with the conventional chemical shift based fat saturation technique, the 1p-Dixon based approach showed much stronger signal intensities in the Achilles, quadriceps, and patellar tendons, with significantly improved contrast to noise ratios (CNRs) of 11.8 ± 2.2, 16.0 ± 1.6, and 26.8 ± 1.3 with the 1p-Dixon method and 0.6 ± 0.2, 4.6 ± 1.0, and 17.5 ± 1.4 with regular fat saturation, respectively. CONCLUSION: The proposed 1p-Dixon based fat suppression allows more flexible selection of imaging parameters and more accurate fat and water separation over the conventional 2p-Dixon in UTE imaging. Moreover, the proposed method provides much improved CNR for short T2 tissues over the conventional fat saturation method.
PURPOSE: In ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging, fat suppression can improve short T2 * contrast but can also reduce short T2 * signals. The conventional two-point Dixon (2p-Dixon) method does not perform well due to short T2 * decay. In this study, we propose a new method to suppress fat for high contrast UTE imaging of short T2 tissues, utilizing a single-point Dixon (1p-Dixon) method. METHODS: The proposed method utilizes dual-echo UTE imaging, where UTE is followed by the second TE, chosen flexibly. Fat is estimated by applying a 1p-Dixon method to the non-UTE image after correction of phase errors, which is used to suppress fat in the UTE image. In vivo ankle and knee imaging were performed at 3 T to evaluate the proposed method. RESULT: It was observed that fat and water signals in tendons were misestimated by the 2p-Dixon method due to signal decay, while the 1p-Dixon method showed reliable fat and water separation not affected by the short T2 * signal decay. Compared with the conventional chemical shift based fat saturation technique, the 1p-Dixon based approach showed much stronger signal intensities in the Achilles, quadriceps, and patellar tendons, with significantly improved contrast to noise ratios (CNRs) of 11.8 ± 2.2, 16.0 ± 1.6, and 26.8 ± 1.3 with the 1p-Dixon method and 0.6 ± 0.2, 4.6 ± 1.0, and 17.5 ± 1.4 with regular fat saturation, respectively. CONCLUSION: The proposed 1p-Dixon based fat suppression allows more flexible selection of imaging parameters and more accurate fat and water separation over the conventional 2p-Dixon in UTE imaging. Moreover, the proposed method provides much improved CNR for short T2 tissues over the conventional fat saturation method.
Authors: Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du; Kenyu Iwasaki; Reni Biswas; Sheronda Statum; Qun He; Won C Bae; Christine B Chung Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2014-09-15 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Jiang Du; Mark Bydder; Atsushi M Takahashi; Michael Carl; Christine B Chung; Graeme M Bydder Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Hyungseok Jang; Alan B McMillan; Yajun Ma; Saeed Jerban; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du; Richard Kijowski Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Saeed Jerban; Yajun Ma; Liang Li; Hyungseok Jang; Lidi Wan; Tan Guo; Adam Searleman; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du Journal: Bone Date: 2019-06-05 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Hyungseok Jang; Zhao Wei; Mei Wu; Ya-Jun Ma; Eric Y Chang; Jody Corey-Bloom; Jiang Du Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-11-20 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Saeed Jerban; Yajun Ma; Erik W Dorthe; Lena Kakos; Nicole Le; Salem Alenezi; Robert L Sah; Eric Y Chang; Darryl D'Lima; Jiang Du Journal: Bone Rep Date: 2019-08-02
Authors: Saeed Jerban; Douglas G Chang; Yajun Ma; Hyungseok Jang; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2020-09-29 Impact factor: 5.555