Literature DB >> 32632747

Characterization of hardware-related spatial distortions for IR-PETRA pulse sequence using a brain specific phantom.

Sima Ahmadian1, Iraj Jabbari2, Seyed Mehdi Bagherimofidi3, Hamidreza Saligheh Rad4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Inversion recovery-pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (IR-PETRA) is an effective magnetic resonance (MR) pulse sequence in generating pseudo-CTs. The hardware-related spatial-distortion (HRSD) in MR images potentially deteriorates the accuracy of pseudo-CTs. Thus, we aimed at characterizing HRSD for IR-PETRA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: gross-HRSDoverall (Euclidean-sum of gross-HRSDi (i = x, y, z)) for IR-PETRA was assessed using a brain-specific phantom for two MR scanners (1.5 T-Aera and 3.0 T-Prisma). Moreover, hardware imperfections were analyzed by determining gradient-nonlinearity spatial-distortion (GNSD) and B0-inhomogeneity spatial-distortion (B0ISD) for magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient-echo (MP-RAGE) which has well-known distortion characteristics.
RESULTS: In 3.0 T, maximum of gross-GNSDoverall (Euclidean-sum of gross-GNSDi) and gross-B0ISD for MP-RAGE was 2.77 mm and 0.57 mm, respectively. For this scanner, the mean and maximum of gross-HRSDoverall for IR-PETRA were 0.63 ± 0.38 mm and 1.91 mm, respectively. In 1.5 T, maximum of gross-GNSDoverall and gross-B0ISD for MP-RAGE was 3.41 mm and 0.78 mm, respectively. The mean and maximum of gross-HRSDoverall for IR-PETRA were 1.02 ± 0.50 mm and 3.12 mm, respectively. DISCUSSION: The spatial accuracy of MR images, besides being impacted by hardware performance, scanner capabilities, and imaging parameters, is mainly affected by its imaging strategy and data acquisition scheme. In 3.0 T, even without applying vendor correction algorithms, spatial accuracy of IR-PETRA image is sufficient for generating pseudo-CTs. In 1.5 T, distortion-correction is required to provide this accuracy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain-specific phantom; Hardware-related spatial distortion; IR-PETRA; Pseudo-CTs

Year:  2020        PMID: 32632747     DOI: 10.1007/s10334-020-00863-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  52 in total

1.  Routine testing of magnetic field homogeneity on clinical MRI systems.

Authors:  Hua-Hsuan Chen; Rex D Boykin; Geoffrey D Clarke; Jia-Hong T Gao; John W Roby
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Accuracy of device-specific 2D and 3D image distortion correction algorithms for magnetic resonance imaging of the head provided by a manufacturer.

Authors:  Christian P Karger; Angelika Höss; Rolf Bendl; Valer Canda; Lothar Schad
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Characterization, prediction, and correction of geometric distortion in 3 T MR images.

Authors:  Lesley N Baldwin; Keith Wachowicz; Steven D Thomas; Ryan Rivest; B Gino Fallone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Clinical comparison of three-dimensional MP-RAGE and FLASH techniques for MR imaging of the head.

Authors:  V M Runge; J E Kirsch; G S Thomas; J P Mugler
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Counterpoint: Opportunities and challenges of a magnetic resonance imaging-only radiotherapy work flow.

Authors:  Tufve Nyholm; Joakim Jonsson
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.934

6.  Malignancy probability map as a novel imaging biomarker to predict malignancy distribution: employing MRS in GBM patients.

Authors:  Manijeh Beigi; Kevan Ghasemi; Parvin Mirzaghavami; Mohammadreza Khanmohammadi; Hamidreza SalighehRad
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Characterization of active and infiltrative tumorous subregions from normal tissue in brain gliomas using multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Anahita Fathi Kazerooni; Mahnaz Nabil; Mehdi Zeinali Zadeh; Kavous Firouznia; Farid Azmoudeh-Ardalan; Alejandro F Frangi; Christos Davatzikos; Hamidreza Saligheh Rad
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Multi-parametric (ADC/PWI/T2-w) image fusion approach for accurate semi-automatic segmentation of tumorous regions in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Anahita Fathi Kazerooni; Meysam Mohseni; Sahar Rezaei; Gholamreza Bakhshandehpour; Hamidreza Saligheh Rad
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 9.  A review of substitute CT generation for MRI-only radiation therapy.

Authors:  Jens M Edmund; Tufve Nyholm
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Findings of DTI-p maps in comparison with T2/T2-FLAIR to assess postoperative hyper-signal abnormal regions in patients with glioblastoma.

Authors:  Manijeh Beigi; Mojtaba Safari; Ahmad Ameri; Mohsen Shojaee Moghadam; Azim Arbabi; Morteza Tabatabaeefar; Hamidreza SalighehRad
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.