Günther Heller1, Erik Bauer, Stefanie Schill, Teresa Thomas, Frank Louwen, Friedrich Wolff, Björn Misselwitz, Stephan Schmidt, Christof Veit. 1. Institute for Quality Assurance and Transparency in Healthcare (IQTIG), Berlin, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; Women's Hospital Holweide, Kliniken der Stadt Köln, Cologne, Germany; Hesse Quality Assurance Office (GQH), Eschborn, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Perinatal Medicine, University Hospitals of Gießen and Marburg, Marburg site, Marburg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) of no more than 20 minutes has long been considered a requirement for cesarean sections, even though there have hardly been any studies on this topic. We retrospectively investigated data relevant to DDI for emergency cesarean sections performed for the most common indications, namely, suspected and documented fetal asphyxia. METHODS: We analyzed data on emergency in-hospital cesarean sections in the period 2008-2015. Low 5- and 10-minute Apgar scores (a scheme with points awarded for breathing, heart rate, muscle tone, skin coloration, and the elicitability of reflexes) were the primary endpoints; acid-base status in arterial cord blood and in-hospital neonatal death were the secondary endpoints. The raw analysis was supplemented by an analysis adjusted for various factors including gestational age, maternal age, and obstetrical presentation. RESULTS: Data from 39 291 neonates were included. The DDI was up to 10 minutes in 64.6% of cases, from 11 to 20 minutes in 34.3%, and over 20 minutes in 1.1%. Low Apgar scores were less common in children whose emergency cesarean sections were performed within 10 minutes or within 20 minutes. For example, the adjusted odds ratio for a 10-minute Apgar score below 4 was 0.49 (95% confidence interval [0.25; 0.96] when a DDI of more than 20 minutes was used as the reference criterion. CONCLUSION: This is the largest population-based, risk-adjusted analysis to be carried out on this topic to date. It reveals, for the first time, an association between DDI of 20 minutes or less and the avoidance of outcomes that are dangerous to the child. As it is not possible to predict such obstetrical emergencies in advance, it seems reasonable to ensure the availability of caredelivery structures that make it possible for emergency cesarean sections to be performed within 20 minutes of the decision to do so.
BACKGROUND: A decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) of no more than 20 minutes has long been considered a requirement for cesarean sections, even though there have hardly been any studies on this topic. We retrospectively investigated data relevant to DDI for emergency cesarean sections performed for the most common indications, namely, suspected and documented fetal asphyxia. METHODS: We analyzed data on emergency in-hospital cesarean sections in the period 2008-2015. Low 5- and 10-minute Apgar scores (a scheme with points awarded for breathing, heart rate, muscle tone, skin coloration, and the elicitability of reflexes) were the primary endpoints; acid-base status in arterial cord blood and in-hospital neonatal death were the secondary endpoints. The raw analysis was supplemented by an analysis adjusted for various factors including gestational age, maternal age, and obstetrical presentation. RESULTS: Data from 39 291 neonates were included. The DDI was up to 10 minutes in 64.6% of cases, from 11 to 20 minutes in 34.3%, and over 20 minutes in 1.1%. Low Apgar scores were less common in children whose emergency cesarean sections were performed within 10 minutes or within 20 minutes. For example, the adjusted odds ratio for a 10-minute Apgar score below 4 was 0.49 (95% confidence interval [0.25; 0.96] when a DDI of more than 20 minutes was used as the reference criterion. CONCLUSION: This is the largest population-based, risk-adjusted analysis to be carried out on this topic to date. It reveals, for the first time, an association between DDI of 20 minutes or less and the avoidance of outcomes that are dangerous to the child. As it is not possible to predict such obstetrical emergencies in advance, it seems reasonable to ensure the availability of caredelivery structures that make it possible for emergency cesarean sections to be performed within 20 minutes of the decision to do so.
Authors: Fayez K Nasrallah; Hassan M Harirah; Rakesh Vadhera; Venu Jain; Letitia T Franklin; Gary D V Hankins Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Cynthia J Holcroft; Ernest M Graham; Abimbola Aina-Mumuney; Karishma K Rai; Janice L Henderson; Donald H Penning Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: K K Roy; Jinee Baruah; Sunesh Kumar; A K Deorari; J B Sharma; Debjyoti Karmakar Journal: Indian J Pediatr Date: 2009-02-04 Impact factor: 1.967
Authors: Steven L Bloom; Kenneth J Leveno; Catherine Y Spong; Sharon Gilbert; John C Hauth; Mark B Landon; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Mary J O'sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; Steven G Gabbe Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Elke Jeschke; Alexandra Biermann; Christian Günster; Thomas Böhler; Günther Heller; Helmut D Hummler; Christoph Bührer Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2016-03-22 Impact factor: 3.418
Authors: Markus Flentje; Hendrik Eismann; Maike Höltje; Vera Hagemann; Lars Brodowski; Constantin von Kaisenberg Journal: Arch Gynecol Obstet Date: 2020-07-13 Impact factor: 2.344
Authors: Matthias David; Katrin Alexandra Scherer; Wolfgang Henrich; Jürgen Breckenkamp Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2018-02-19 Impact factor: 2.915