Literature DB >> 33743626

Decision to delivery interval and associated factors for emergency cesarean section: a cross-sectional study.

Tebabere Moltot Kitaw1, Simachew Kassa Limenh2, Fantahun Alemnew Chekole2, Simegnew Asmer Getie2, Belete Negese Gemeda3, Abayneh Shewangzaw Engda3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency cesarean section is a commonly performed surgical procedure in pregnant women with life-threatening conditions of the mother and/or fetus. According to the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, decision to delivery interval for emergency cesarean sections should be within 30 min. It is an indicator of quality of care in maternity service, and if prolonged, it constitutes a third-degree delay. This study aimed to assess the decision to delivery interval and associated factors for emergency cesarean section in Bahir Dar City Public Hospitals, Ethiopia.
METHOD: An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted at Bahir Dar City Public Hospitals from February to May 2020. Study participants were selected using a systematic random sampling technique. A combination of observations and interviews was used to collect the data. Data entry and analysis were performed using Epi-data version 3.1 and SPSS version 25, respectively. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULT: Decision-to-delivery interval below 30 min was observed in 20.3% [95% CI = 15.90-24.70%] of emergency cesarean section. The results showed that referral status [AOR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.26-5.00], time of day of emergency cesarean section [AOR = 2.5, 95%CI = 1.26-4.92], status of surgeons [AOR = 2.95, 95%CI = 1.30-6.70], type of anesthesia [AOR = 4, 95% CI = 1.60-10.00] and transfer time [AOR = 5.26, 95% CI = 2.65-10.46] were factors significantly associated with the decision to delivery interval.
CONCLUSION: Decision-to-delivery intervals were not achieved within the recommended time interval. Therefore, to address institutional delays in emergency cesarean section, providers and facilities should be better prepared in advance and ready for rapid emergency action.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bahir Dar; Decision to delivery interval; Emergency cesarean section; Ethiopia; Public hospitals

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33743626      PMCID: PMC7981954          DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03706-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth        ISSN: 1471-2393            Impact factor:   3.007


  18 in total

1.  Predictions for the decision-to-delivery interval for emergency cesarean sections in Norway.

Authors:  Toril Kolås; Dag Hofoss; Pål Oian
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Multidisciplinary team training reduces the decision-to-delivery interval for emergency Caesarean section.

Authors:  L Fuhrmann; T H Pedersen; A Atke; A M Møller; D Østergaard
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.105

3.  Decision-to-delivery intervals and total duration of surgery for Caesarean sections in a tertiary general hospital.

Authors:  Tuck Chin Tiffany Wong; Chang Qi Hester Lau; Eng Loy Tan; Devendra Kanagalingam
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 1.858

4.  Decision-to-Delivery Time and Perinatal Complications in Emergency Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Günther Heller; Erik Bauer; Stefanie Schill; Teresa Thomas; Frank Louwen; Friedrich Wolff; Björn Misselwitz; Stephan Schmidt; Christof Veit
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 5.  The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines for caesarean section, 2011 update: implications for the anaesthetist.

Authors:  S Soltanifar; R Russell
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 2.603

6.  Decision-to-Delivery Time Intervals in Emergency Caesarean Section Cases: Repeated cross-sectional study from Oman.

Authors:  Kaukab Tashfeen; Malini Patel; Ilham M Hamdi; Ibrahim H A Al-Busaidi; Mansour N Al-Yarubi
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2017-03-30

7.  Evaluation of timings and outcomes in category-one caesarean sections: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Clare Newton Dunn; Qianpian Zhang; Josh Tjunrong Sia; Pryseley Nkouibert Assam; Shephali Tagore; Ban Leong Sng
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2016-08

8.  Factors leading to cesarean section delivery at Felegehiwot referral hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: a retrospective record review.

Authors:  Fantu Eyowas Abebe; Abebaw Worku Gebeyehu; Ashebir Negasi Kidane; Gizached Aynalem Eyassu
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.223

9.  The decision delivery interval in emergency caesarean section and its associated maternal and fetal outcomes at a referral hospital in northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Birjna A Hirani; Bariki L Mchome; Nicholaus S Mazuguni; Michael J Mahande
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Evaluation of decision to delivery time interval and its effect on feto-maternal outcomes and associated factors in category-1 emergency caesarean section deliveries: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mamaru Mollalign Temesgen; Amare Hailekirose Gebregzi; Habtamu Getinet Kasahun; Seid Adem Ahmed; Yophtahe Berhe Woldegerima
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  3 in total

1.  The evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in category-1 emergency cesarean section: a report of six cases.

Authors:  Atsushi Kotera
Journal:  JA Clin Rep       Date:  2022-04-26

2.  Perinatal Asphyxia and Its Associated Factors among Live Births in the Public Health Facilities of Bahir Dar City, Northwest Ethiopia, 2021.

Authors:  Magarsa Lami Dabalo; Simachew Animen Bante; Getahun Belay Gela; Selamawit Lake Fanta; Lemesa Abdisa Sori; Wondu Feyisa Balcha; Yomilan Geneti Muse; Tigist Derebe Tesfahun
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2021-11-08

3.  Colchicine prophylaxis is associated with fewer gout flares after COVID-19 vaccination.

Authors:  Jie Lu; Yuwei He; Robert Terkeltaub; Mingshu Sun; Zijing Ran; Xinmiao Xu; Can Wang; Xinde Li; Shuhui Hu; Xiaomei Xue; Fei Yan; Hui Zhang; Huiyong Yin; Yongyong Shi; Nicola Dalbeth; Changgui Li
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 27.973

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.