Literature DB >> 12066937

What is a reasonable time from decision-to-delivery by caesarean section? Evidence from 415 deliveries.

I Z MacKenzie1, Inez Cooke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine how long it takes from the decision to achieve delivery by non-elective caesarean section (DDI), the influences on this interval, and the impact on neonatal condition at birth.
DESIGN: Twelve months prospective data collection on all non-elective caesarean sections.
METHODS: Prospective collection of data relating to all caesarean sections in 1996 in a major teaching hospital obstetric unit was conducted, without the knowledge of the other clinicians providing clinical care. Details of the indication for section, the day and time of the decision and the interval till delivery were recorded as well as the seniority of the surgeon, and condition of the baby at birth.
RESULTS: The mean time from decision-to-delivery for 100 emergency intrapartum caesarean sections was 42.9 minutes for fetal distress and 71.1 minutes for 230 without fetal distress (P < 0.0001). For 22 'crash' sections the mean time from decision-to-delivery was 27.4 minutes; for 13 urgent antepartum deliveries for fetal reasons it was 124.7 minutes and for 21 with maternal reasons it was 97.4 minutes. The seniority of the surgeon managing the patient did not appear to influence the interval, nor did the time of day or day of the week when the delivery occurred. Intrapartum sections were quicker the more advanced the labour, and general anaesthesia was associated with shorter intervals than regional anaesthesia for emergency caesarean section for fetal distress (P < 0.001). Babies born within one hour of the decision tended to be more acidaemic than those born later, irrespective of the indication for delivery. Babies tended to be in better condition when a time from decision-to-delivery was not recorded than those for whom the information had been recorded.
CONCLUSION: Fewer than 40% intrapartum deliveries by caesarean section for fetal distress were achieved within 30 minutes of the decision, despite that being the unit standard. There was, however, no evidence to indicate that overall an interval up to 120 minutes was detrimental to the neonate unless the delivery was a 'crash' caesarean section. These data thus do not provide evidence to sustain the recommendation of a standard of 30 minutes for intrapartum delivery by caesarean section.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12066937     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01323.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  20 in total

1.  National cross sectional survey to determine whether the decision to delivery interval is critical in emergency caesarean section.

Authors:  Jane Thomas; Shantini Paranjothy; David James
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-15

2.  Improving emergency caesarean delivery response times at a rural community hospital.

Authors:  Susan E Mooney; Greg Ogrinc; Wendy Steadman
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-02

3.  Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress, continuous fetal heart monitoring and decision to delivery time.

Authors:  K K Roy; Jinee Baruah; Sunesh Kumar; A K Deorari; J B Sharma; Debjyoti Karmakar
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 1.967

4.  Is there a safe limit of delay for emergency caesarean section in Ghana? Results of analysis of early perinatal outcome.

Authors:  S A Oppong; M G Tuuli; J D Seffah; R M K Adanu
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2014-03

5.  Decision-to-delivery intervals and total duration of surgery for Caesarean sections in a tertiary general hospital.

Authors:  Tuck Chin Tiffany Wong; Chang Qi Hester Lau; Eng Loy Tan; Devendra Kanagalingam
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 1.858

6.  Evaluation of Clinical Diagnosis of Fetal Distress and Perinatal Outcome in a Low Resource Nigerian Setting.

Authors:  Leonard Ogbonna Ajah; Perpetus Chudi Ibekwe; Fidelis Agwu Onu; Ogah Emeka Onwe; Thecla Chinonyelum Ezeonu; Innocent Omeje
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-04-01

7.  Decision-to-Delivery Time and Perinatal Complications in Emergency Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Günther Heller; Erik Bauer; Stefanie Schill; Teresa Thomas; Frank Louwen; Friedrich Wolff; Björn Misselwitz; Stephan Schmidt; Christof Veit
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  Evaluating the Decision-to-Delivery Interval in Emergency Cesarean Sections and its Impact on Neonatal Outcome.

Authors:  Janna-Alica Brandt; Bernd Morgenstern; Fabinshy Thangarajah; Berthold GrÜttner; Sebastian Ludwig; Christian Eichler; Jessika Ratiu; Peter Mallmann; Dominik Ratiu
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Complications of childbirth and maternal deaths in Kinshasa hospitals: testimonies from women and their families.

Authors:  Eugénie Kabali; Catherine Gourbin; Vincent De Brouwere
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Decision - delivery interval and perinatal outcome of emergency caesarean sections at a tertiary institution.

Authors:  Onyedikachi Edwin Chukwudi; Chukwunwendu Anthony Okonkwo
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.088

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.