Literature DB >> 19190880

Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress, continuous fetal heart monitoring and decision to delivery time.

K K Roy1, Jinee Baruah, Sunesh Kumar, A K Deorari, J B Sharma, Debjyoti Karmakar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To find out the efficacy of continuous fetal heart monitoring by analyzing the cases of cesarean section for nonreassuring fetal heart in labor, detected by cardiotocography (CTG) and correlating these cases with perinatal outcome. To evaluate whether a 30 minute decision to delivery (D-D) interval for emergency cesarean section influences perinatal outcome.
METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of 217 patients who underwent cesarean section at > or = 36 weeks for non-reassuring fetal heart in labor detected by CTG. The maternal demographic profile, specific types of abnormal fetal heart rate tracing and the decision to delivery time interval were noted. The adverse immediate neonatal outcomes in terms of Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, umbilical cord thornH <7.10, neonates requiring immediate ventilation and NICU admissions were recorded. The correlation between non-reassuring fetal heart, decision to delivery interval and neonatal outcome were analyzed.
RESULTS: Out of 3148 patients delivered at > or = 36 weeks, 217 (6.8%) patients underwent cesarean section during labor primarily for non-reassuring fetal heart. The most common fetal heart abnormality was persistent bradycardia in 106 (48.8%) cases followed by late deceleration in 38 (17.5%) cases and decreased beat to beat variability in 17 (7.8%) cases. In 33 (15.2%) babies the 5 minutes Apgar score was <7 out of which 13 (5.9%) babies had cord thornH <7.10. Thirty three (15.2%) babies required NICU admission for suspected birth asphyxia. Rest 184 (84.7%) neonates were born healthy and cared for by mother. Regarding decision to delivery interval of < or =30 minutes versus >30 minutes, there was no significant difference in the incidence of Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, cord pH <7.10 and new born babies requiring immediate ventilation. But the need for admission to NICU in the group of D-D interval < or = 30 minutes was significantly higher compared to the other group where D-D interval was >30 minutes.
CONCLUSION: Non-reassuring fetal heart rate detected by CTG did not correlate well with adverse neonatal outcome. There was no significant difference in immediate adverse neonatal outcome whether the D-D time interval was < or = 30 minutes or >30 minutes; contrary to this, NICU admission for suspected birth asphyxia in </= 30 minutes group was significantly higher.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19190880     DOI: 10.1007/s12098-008-0245-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Pediatr        ISSN: 0019-5456            Impact factor:   1.967


  20 in total

1.  What is a reasonable time from decision-to-delivery by caesarean section? Evidence from 415 deliveries.

Authors:  I Z MacKenzie; Inez Cooke
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 2.  Current status of intrapartum fetal monitoring: cardiotocography versus cardiotocography + ST analysis of the fetal ECG.

Authors:  Per Olofsson
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2003-09-22       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  Decision - delivery interval and perinatal outcome in emergency caesarean sections.

Authors:  H E Onah; N Ibeziako; A C Umezulike; E R Effetie; C M Ogbuokiri
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes.

Authors:  Steven L Bloom; Kenneth J Leveno; Catherine Y Spong; Sharon Gilbert; John C Hauth; Mark B Landon; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Mary J O'sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; Steven G Gabbe
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Improved intrapartum surveillance with PR interval analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram: a randomized trial showing a reduction in fetal blood sampling.

Authors:  W J van Wijngaarden; D S Sahota; D K James; T Farrell; G J Mires; M Wilcox; A Chang
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Cesarean section for suspected fetal distress. Does the decision-incision time make a difference?

Authors:  S P Chauhan; H Roach; R W Naef; E F Magann; J C Morrison; J N Martin
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 0.142

7.  Caesarean section audit by peer review.

Authors:  V Wareham; C Bain; D Cruickshank
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.435

8.  Hemorrhage after fetal scalp blood sampling.

Authors:  R Chawla; G Deppe; S Ahart; N Gleicher
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1984-05-01       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean section-are current standards achievable? Observational case series.

Authors:  D J Tuffnell; K Wilkinson; N Beresford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-02

10.  Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy.

Authors:  K B Nelson; J M Dambrosia; T Y Ting; J K Grether
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-03-07       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of Clinical Diagnosis of Fetal Distress and Perinatal Outcome in a Low Resource Nigerian Setting.

Authors:  Leonard Ogbonna Ajah; Perpetus Chudi Ibekwe; Fidelis Agwu Onu; Ogah Emeka Onwe; Thecla Chinonyelum Ezeonu; Innocent Omeje
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-04-01

2.  SLC9B1 methylation predicts fetal intolerance of labor.

Authors:  Anna K Knight; Karen N Conneely; Varun Kilaru; Dawayland Cobb; Jennifer L Payne; Samantha Meilman; Elizabeth J Corwin; Zachary A Kaminsky; Anne L Dunlop; Alicia K Smith
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.528

3.  Decision-to-Delivery Time and Perinatal Complications in Emergency Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Günther Heller; Erik Bauer; Stefanie Schill; Teresa Thomas; Frank Louwen; Friedrich Wolff; Björn Misselwitz; Stephan Schmidt; Christof Veit
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Decision Delivery Interval in Emergency and Urgent Caesarean Sections: Need to Reconsider the Recommendations?

Authors:  Nalini Mishra; Ruchi Gupta; Nomita Singh
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2017-04-13

5.  Evaluation of timings and outcomes in category-one caesarean sections: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Clare Newton Dunn; Qianpian Zhang; Josh Tjunrong Sia; Pryseley Nkouibert Assam; Shephali Tagore; Ban Leong Sng
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2016-08

6.  Evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean section: A 1-year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  Sunanda Gupta; Udita Naithani; C Madhanmohan; Ajay Singh; Pradeep Reddy; Apoorva Gupta
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

7.  The decision delivery interval in emergency caesarean section and its associated maternal and fetal outcomes at a referral hospital in northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Birjna A Hirani; Bariki L Mchome; Nicholaus S Mazuguni; Michael J Mahande
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Strategies for intrapartum foetal surveillance in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.

Authors:  Natasha Housseine; Marieke C Punt; Joyce L Browne; Tarek Meguid; Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch; Barbara E Kwast; Arie Franx; Diederick E Grobbee; Marcus J Rijken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.