OBJECTIVE: To compare perinatal outcomes in patients at term (37 weeks) in whom the decision-incision time for cesarean delivery was due to suspected fetal distress. STUDY DESIGN: All parturients who underwent cesarean delivery primarily for possible fetal distress during a three-year period were identified retrospectively. Student's t test and the chi 2 test were utilized, and P < .05 was considered significant. A regression analysis of decision-incision time and umbilical arterial pH was performed. RESULTS: From 1991 to 1993, 1.3% (117/9,137) of term laboring patients underwent emergency cesarean delivery for the primary indication of possible fetal distress. In 61 patients (52%) the decision-incision time was 30 minutes, while it exceeded 30 minutes in the remaining 56 women. The two patient groups were similar in maternal demographics, antepartum complications, oxytocin usage, thick meconium, type of abnormal fetal heart rate tracing prompting surgery, use of amnioinfusion (41% vs. 36%), general anesthesia (97% vs. 93%), mean birth weight and Apgar score < 7 at five minutes. Three adverse outcomes were observed more frequently in association with decision-incision time > 30 minutes: (1) lower mean (+/-SD) umbilical arterial pH (7.16 +/- 0.15 vs. 7.26 +/- 0.06, P = .001), (2) pH < 7.00 (8/61 vs. 0/56, P = .005), and (3) admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (P = .008). When the incision was made longer than 30 minutes after the decision, there was no apparent adverse neonatal or infant outcome. CONCLUSION: Although a cesarean decision-incision time < or = 30 minutes is a desirable goal for the fetus possibly in distress, failure to achieve this goal is not associated with a measurable negative impact on newborn outcome.
OBJECTIVE: To compare perinatal outcomes in patients at term (37 weeks) in whom the decision-incision time for cesarean delivery was due to suspected fetal distress. STUDY DESIGN: All parturients who underwent cesarean delivery primarily for possible fetal distress during a three-year period were identified retrospectively. Student's t test and the chi 2 test were utilized, and P < .05 was considered significant. A regression analysis of decision-incision time and umbilical arterial pH was performed. RESULTS: From 1991 to 1993, 1.3% (117/9,137) of term laboring patients underwent emergency cesarean delivery for the primary indication of possible fetal distress. In 61 patients (52%) the decision-incision time was 30 minutes, while it exceeded 30 minutes in the remaining 56 women. The two patient groups were similar in maternal demographics, antepartum complications, oxytocin usage, thick meconium, type of abnormal fetal heart rate tracing prompting surgery, use of amnioinfusion (41% vs. 36%), general anesthesia (97% vs. 93%), mean birth weight and Apgar score < 7 at five minutes. Three adverse outcomes were observed more frequently in association with decision-incision time > 30 minutes: (1) lower mean (+/-SD) umbilical arterial pH (7.16 +/- 0.15 vs. 7.26 +/- 0.06, P = .001), (2) pH < 7.00 (8/61 vs. 0/56, P = .005), and (3) admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (P = .008). When the incision was made longer than 30 minutes after the decision, there was no apparent adverse neonatal or infant outcome. CONCLUSION: Although a cesarean decision-incision time < or = 30 minutes is a desirable goal for the fetus possibly in distress, failure to achieve this goal is not associated with a measurable negative impact on newborn outcome.
Authors: K K Roy; Jinee Baruah; Sunesh Kumar; A K Deorari; J B Sharma; Debjyoti Karmakar Journal: Indian J Pediatr Date: 2009-02-04 Impact factor: 1.967
Authors: William A Grobman; Jennifer Bailit; Grecio Sandoval; Uma M Reddy; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Steve N Caritis; Mona Prasad; Alan T N Tita; George R Saade; Yoram Sorokin; Dwight J Rouse; Sean C Blackwell; Jorge E Tolosa Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2017-09-15 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Günther Heller; Erik Bauer; Stefanie Schill; Teresa Thomas; Frank Louwen; Friedrich Wolff; Björn Misselwitz; Stephan Schmidt; Christof Veit Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2017-09-04 Impact factor: 5.594