Literature DB >> 28860674

Assessing the resilience of Norway spruce forests through a model-based reanalysis of thinning trials.

Rupert Seidl1, Friedrich Vigl1, Günter Rössler2, Markus Neumann2, Werner Rammer1.   

Abstract

As a result of a rapidly changing climate the resilience of forests is an increasingly important property for ecosystem management. Recent efforts have improved the theoretical understanding of resilience, yet its operational quantification remains challenging. Furthermore, there is growing awareness that resilience is not only a means to addressing the consequences of climate change but is also affected by it, necessitating a better understanding of the climate sensitivity of resilience. Quantifying current and future resilience is thus an important step towards mainstreaming resilience thinking into ecosystem management. Here, we present a novel approach for quantifying forest resilience from thinning trials, and assess the climate sensitivity of resilience using process-based ecosystem modeling. We reinterpret the wide range of removal intensities and frequencies in thinning trials as an experimental gradient of perturbation, and estimate resilience as the recovery rate after perturbation. Our specific objectives were (i) to determine how resilience varies with stand and site conditions, (ii) to assess the climate sensitivity of resilience across a range of potential future climate scenarios, and (iii) to evaluate the robustness of resilience estimates to different focal indicators and assessment methodologies. We analyzed three long-term thinning trials in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) forests across an elevation gradient in Austria, evaluating and applying the individual-based process model iLand. The resilience of Norway spruce was highest at the montane site, and decreased at lower elevations. Resilience also decreased with increasing stand age and basal area. The effects of climate change were strongly context-dependent: At the montane site, where precipitation levels were ample even under climate change, warming increased resilience in all scenarios. At lower elevations, however, rising temperatures decreased resilience, particularly at precipitation levels below 750-800 mm. Our results were largely robust to different focal variables and resilience definitions. Based on our findings management can improve the capacity to recover from partial disturbances by avoiding overmature and overstocked conditions. At increasingly water limited sites a strongly decreasing resilience of Norway spruce will require a shift towards tree species better adapted to the expected future conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Climate change; Disturbance; Engineering resilience; Picea abies, iLand; Recovery

Year:  2017        PMID: 28860674      PMCID: PMC5572630          DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.11.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  For Ecol Manage        ISSN: 0378-1127            Impact factor:   3.558


  18 in total

1.  Effects of thinning on drought vulnerability and climate response in north temperate forest ecosystems.

Authors:  Anthony W D'Amato; John B Bradford; Shawn Fraver; Brian J Palik
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.657

2.  The rise of novelty in ecosystems.

Authors:  Volker C Radeloff; John W Williams; Brooke L Bateman; Kevin D Burke; Sarah K Carter; Evan S Childress; Kara J Cromwell; Claudio Gratton; Andrew O Hasley; Benjamin M Kraemer; Alexander W Latzka; Erika Marin-Spiotta; Curt D Meine; Samuel E Munoz; Thomas M Neeson; Anna M Pidgeon; Adena R Rissman; Ricardo J Rivera; Laura M Szymanski; Jacob Usinowicz
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.657

3.  Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions.

Authors:  Susan Solomon; Gian-Kasper Plattner; Reto Knutti; Pierre Friedlingstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Disturbances catalyze the adaptation of forest ecosystems to changing climate conditions.

Authors:  Dominik Thom; Werner Rammer; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 10.863

5.  Searching for resilience: addressing the impacts of changing disturbance regimes on forest ecosystem services.

Authors:  Rupert Seidl; Thomas A Spies; David L Peterson; Scott L Stephens; Jeffrey A Hicke
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 6.865

6.  Stand competition determines how different tree species will cope with a warming climate.

Authors:  Laura Fernández-de-Uña; Isabel Cañellas; Guillermo Gea-Izquierdo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The impacts of climate change and disturbance on spatio-temporal trajectories of biodiversity in a temperate forest landscape.

Authors:  Dominik Thom; Werner Rammer; Thomas Dirnböck; Jörg Müller; Johannes Kobler; Klaus Katzensteiner; Norbert Helm; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 6.528

8.  A walk on the wild side: Disturbance dynamics and the conservation and management of European mountain forest ecosystems.

Authors:  Dominik Kulakowski; Rupert Seidl; Jan Holeksa; Timo Kuuluvainen; Thomas A Nagel; Momchil Panayotov; Miroslav Svoboda; Simon Thorn; Giorgio Vacchiano; Cathy Whitlock; Thomas Wohlgemuth; Peter Bebi
Journal:  For Ecol Manage       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Changes of forest cover and disturbance regimes in the mountain forests of the Alps.

Authors:  P Bebi; R Seidl; R Motta; M Fuhr; D Firm; F Krumm; M Conedera; C Ginzler; T Wohlgemuth; D Kulakowski
Journal:  For Ecol Manage       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  The Shape of Ecosystem Management to Come: Anticipating Risks and Fostering Resilience.

Authors:  Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 8.589

View more
  9 in total

1.  Reviewing the Use of Resilience Concepts in Forest Sciences.

Authors:  L Nikinmaa; M Lindner; E Cantarello; A S Jump; R Seidl; G Winkel; B Muys
Journal:  Curr For Rep       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 10.975

2.  What drives the future supply of regulating ecosystem services in a mountain forest landscape?

Authors:  Rupert Seidl; Katharina Albrich; Karlheinz Erb; Herbert Formayer; David Leidinger; Georg Leitinger; Ulrike Tappeiner; Erich Tasser; Werner Rammer
Journal:  For Ecol Manage       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.384

3.  Post-disturbance recovery of forest carbon in a temperate forest landscape under climate change.

Authors:  Laura Dobor; Tomáš Hlásny; Werner Rammer; Ivan Barka; Jiří Trombik; Pavol Pavlenda; Vladimír Šebeň; Petr Štepánek; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Agric For Meteorol       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 6.424

4.  The impact of future forest dynamics on climate: interactive effects of changing vegetation and disturbance regimes.

Authors:  Dominik Thom; Werner Rammer; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Ecol Monogr       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 10.315

5.  Simulating forest resilience: A review.

Authors:  Katharina Albrich; Werner Rammer; Monica G Turner; Zak Ratajczak; Kristin H Braziunas; Winslow D Hansen; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Glob Ecol Biogeogr       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 6.909

6.  Harnessing landscape heterogeneity for managing future disturbance risks in forest ecosystems.

Authors:  Rupert Seidl; Katharina Albrich; Dominik Thom; Werner Rammer
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 6.789

7.  A walk on the wild side: Disturbance dynamics and the conservation and management of European mountain forest ecosystems.

Authors:  Dominik Kulakowski; Rupert Seidl; Jan Holeksa; Timo Kuuluvainen; Thomas A Nagel; Momchil Panayotov; Miroslav Svoboda; Simon Thorn; Giorgio Vacchiano; Cathy Whitlock; Thomas Wohlgemuth; Peter Bebi
Journal:  For Ecol Manage       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Using Landsat time series for characterizing forest disturbance dynamics in the coupled human and natural systems of Central Europe.

Authors:  Cornelius Senf; Dirk Pflugmacher; Patrick Hostert; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 8.979

9.  Norway spruce at the trailing edge: the effect of landscape configuration and composition on climate resilience.

Authors:  Juha Honkaniemi; Werner Rammer; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Landsc Ecol       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 5.043

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.