Literature DB >> 26910939

The rise of novelty in ecosystems.

Volker C Radeloff, John W Williams, Brooke L Bateman, Kevin D Burke, Sarah K Carter, Evan S Childress, Kara J Cromwell, Claudio Gratton, Andrew O Hasley, Benjamin M Kraemer, Alexander W Latzka, Erika Marin-Spiotta, Curt D Meine, Samuel E Munoz, Thomas M Neeson, Anna M Pidgeon, Adena R Rissman, Ricardo J Rivera, Laura M Szymanski, Jacob Usinowicz.   

Abstract

Rapid and ongoing change creates novelty in ecosystems everywhere, both when comparing contemporary systems to their historical baselines, and predicted future systems to the present. However, the level of novelty varies greatly among places. Here we propose a formal and quantifiable definition of abiotic and biotic novelty in ecosystems, map abiotic novelty globally, and discuss the implications of novelty for the science of ecology and for biodiversity conservation. We define novelty as the degree of dissimilarity of a system, measured in one or more dimensions relative to a reference baseline, usually defined as either the present or a time window in the past. In this conceptualization, novelty varies in degree, it is multidimensional, can be measured, and requires a temporal and spatial reference. This definition moves beyond prior categorical definitions of novel ecosystems, and does not include human agency, self-perpetuation, or irreversibility as criteria. Our global assessment of novelty was based on abiotic factors (temperature, precipitation, and nitrogen deposition) plus human population, and shows that there are already large areas with high novelty today relative to the early 20th century, and that there will even be more such areas by 2050. Interestingly, the places that are most novel are often not the places where absolute changes are largest; highlighting that novelty is inherently different from change. For the ecological sciences, highly novel ecosystems present new opportunities to test ecological theories, but also challenge the predictive ability of ecological models and their validation. For biodiversity conservation, increasing novelty presents some opportunities, but largely challenges. Conservation action is necessary along the entire continuum of novelty, by redoubling efforts to protect areas where novelty is low, identifying conservation opportunities where novelty is high, developing flexible yet strong regulations and policies, and establishing long-term experiments to test management approaches. Meeting the challenge of novelty will require advances in the science of ecology, and new and creative. conservation approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26910939     DOI: 10.1890/14-1781.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  26 in total

1.  Prey abundance and urbanization influence the establishment of avian predators in a metropolitan landscape.

Authors:  Jennifer D McCabe; He Yin; Jennyffer Cruz; Volker Radeloff; Anna Pidgeon; David N Bonter; Benjamin Zuckerberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Pliocene and Eocene provide best analogs for near-future climates.

Authors:  K D Burke; J W Williams; M A Chandler; A M Haywood; D J Lunt; B L Otto-Bliesner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  A unifying framework for studying and managing climate-driven rates of ecological change.

Authors:  John W Williams; Alejandro Ordonez; Jens-Christian Svenning
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Differing climatic mechanisms control transient and accumulated vegetation novelty in Europe and eastern North America.

Authors:  Kevin D Burke; John W Williams; Simon Brewer; Walter Finsinger; Thomas Giesecke; David J Lorenz; Alejandro Ordonez
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Changes in precipitation patterns can destabilize plant species coexistence via changes in plant-soil feedback.

Authors:  Jan-Hendrik Dudenhöffer; Noah C Luecke; Kerri M Crawford
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 15.460

Review 6.  Fluctuating selection and global change: a synthesis and review on disentangling the roles of climate amplitude, predictability and novelty.

Authors:  M C Bitter; J M Wong; H G Dam; S C Donelan; C D Kenkel; L M Komoroske; K J Nickols; E B Rivest; S Salinas; S C Burgess; K E Lotterhos
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 5.530

7.  Disturbances catalyze the adaptation of forest ecosystems to changing climate conditions.

Authors:  Dominik Thom; Werner Rammer; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 10.863

8.  A walk on the wild side: Disturbance dynamics and the conservation and management of European mountain forest ecosystems.

Authors:  Dominik Kulakowski; Rupert Seidl; Jan Holeksa; Timo Kuuluvainen; Thomas A Nagel; Momchil Panayotov; Miroslav Svoboda; Simon Thorn; Giorgio Vacchiano; Cathy Whitlock; Thomas Wohlgemuth; Peter Bebi
Journal:  For Ecol Manage       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Assessing the resilience of Norway spruce forests through a model-based reanalysis of thinning trials.

Authors:  Rupert Seidl; Friedrich Vigl; Günter Rössler; Markus Neumann; Werner Rammer
Journal:  For Ecol Manage       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 10.  The long and the short of it: Mechanisms of synchronous and compensatory dynamics across temporal scales.

Authors:  Lauren G Shoemaker; Lauren M Hallett; Lei Zhao; Daniel C Reuman; Shaopeng Wang; Kathryn L Cottingham; Richard J Hobbs; Max C N Castorani; Amy L Downing; Joan C Dudney; Samuel B Fey; Laureano A Gherardi; Nina Lany; Cristina Portales-Reyes; Andrew L Rypel; Lawrence W Sheppard; Jonathan A Walter; Katharine N Suding
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 6.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.