Literature DB >> 29275284

Harnessing landscape heterogeneity for managing future disturbance risks in forest ecosystems.

Rupert Seidl1, Katharina Albrich2, Dominik Thom2, Werner Rammer2.   

Abstract

In order to prevent irreversible impacts of climate change on the biosphere it is imperative to phase out the use of fossil fuels. Consequently, the provisioning of renewable resources such as timber and biomass from forests is an ecosystem service of increasing importance. However, risk factors such as changing disturbance regimes are challenging the continuous provisioning of ecosystem services, and are thus a key concern in forest management. We here used simulation modeling to study different risk management strategies in the context of timber production under changing climate and disturbance regimes, focusing on a 8127 ha forest landscape in the Northern Front Range of the Alps in Austria. We show that under a continuation of historical management, disturbances from wind and bark beetles increase by +39.5% on average over 200 years in response to future climate change. Promoting mixed forests and climate-adapted tree species as well as increasing management intensity effectively reduced future disturbance risk. Analyzing the spatial patterns of disturbance on the landscape, we found a highly uneven distribution of risk among stands (Gini coefficients up to 0.466), but also a spatially variable effectiveness of silvicultural risk reduction measures. This spatial variability in the contribution to and control of risk can be used to inform disturbance management: Stands which have a high leverage on overall risk and for which risks can effectively be reduced (24.4% of the stands in our simulations) should be a priority for risk mitigation measures. In contrast, management should embrace natural disturbances for their beneficial effects on biodiversity in areas which neither contribute strongly to landscape-scale risk nor respond positively to risk mitigation measures (16.9% of stands). We here illustrate how spatial heterogeneity in forest landscapes can be harnessed to address both positive and negative effects of changing natural disturbance regimes in ecosystem management.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Climate change impacts; Forest disturbance regimes; Landscape management; Risk management; Timber production; iLand

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29275284      PMCID: PMC5873512          DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  22 in total

1.  The sensitivity of current and future forest managers to climate-induced changes in ecological processes.

Authors:  Rupert Seidl; Filip Aggestam; Werner Rammer; Kristina Blennow; Bernhard Wolfslehner
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Sustainability. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet.

Authors:  Will Steffen; Katherine Richardson; Johan Rockström; Sarah E Cornell; Ingo Fetzer; Elena M Bennett; Reinette Biggs; Stephen R Carpenter; Wim de Vries; Cynthia A de Wit; Carl Folke; Dieter Gerten; Jens Heinke; Georgina M Mace; Linn M Persson; Veerabhadran Ramanathan; Belinda Reyers; Sverker Sörlin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Exact and Asymptotic Weighted Logrank Tests for Interval Censored Data: The interval R package.

Authors:  Michael P Fay; Pamela A Shaw
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.440

4.  Spatial variability in tree regeneration after wildfire delays and dampens future bark beetle outbreaks.

Authors:  Rupert Seidl; Daniel C Donato; Kenneth F Raffa; Monica G Turner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Disturbances catalyze the adaptation of forest ecosystems to changing climate conditions.

Authors:  Dominik Thom; Werner Rammer; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 10.863

6.  Climate change amplifies the interactions between wind and bark beetle disturbances in forest landscapes.

Authors:  Rupert Seidl; Werner Rammer
Journal:  Landsc Ecol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 3.848

7.  Forest disturbances under climate change.

Authors:  Rupert Seidl; Dominik Thom; Markus Kautz; Dario Martin-Benito; Mikko Peltoniemi; Giorgio Vacchiano; Jan Wild; Davide Ascoli; Michal Petr; Juha Honkaniemi; Manfred J Lexer; Volodymyr Trotsiuk; Paola Mairota; Miroslav Svoboda; Marek Fabrika; Thomas A Nagel; Christopher P O Reyer
Journal:  Nat Clim Chang       Date:  2017-05-31

8.  Assessing the resilience of Norway spruce forests through a model-based reanalysis of thinning trials.

Authors:  Rupert Seidl; Friedrich Vigl; Günter Rössler; Markus Neumann; Werner Rammer
Journal:  For Ecol Manage       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Small beetle, large-scale drivers: how regional and landscape factors affect outbreaks of the European spruce bark beetle.

Authors:  Rupert Seidl; Jörg Müller; Torsten Hothorn; Claus Bässler; Marco Heurich; Markus Kautz
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 6.528

10.  The Shape of Ecosystem Management to Come: Anticipating Risks and Fostering Resilience.

Authors:  Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 8.589

View more
  9 in total

1.  Reducing rotation age to address increasing disturbances in Central Europe: Potential and limitations.

Authors:  Soňa Zimová; Laura Dobor; Tomáš Hlásny; Werner Rammer; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  For Ecol Manage       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.384

2.  What drives the future supply of regulating ecosystem services in a mountain forest landscape?

Authors:  Rupert Seidl; Katharina Albrich; Karlheinz Erb; Herbert Formayer; David Leidinger; Georg Leitinger; Ulrike Tappeiner; Erich Tasser; Werner Rammer
Journal:  For Ecol Manage       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.384

3.  Effects of disturbance patterns and deadwood on the microclimate in European beech forests.

Authors:  Dominik Thom; Andreas Sommerfeld; Julius Sebald; Jonas Hagge; Jörg Müller; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Agric For Meteorol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 6.424

4.  Post-disturbance recovery of forest carbon in a temperate forest landscape under climate change.

Authors:  Laura Dobor; Tomáš Hlásny; Werner Rammer; Ivan Barka; Jiří Trombik; Pavol Pavlenda; Vladimír Šebeň; Petr Štepánek; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Agric For Meteorol       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 6.424

Review 5.  The Vision of Managing for Pest-Resistant Landscapes: Realistic or Utopic?

Authors:  Daniel D Kneeshaw; Brian R Sturtevant; Louis DeGrandpé; Enrique Doblas-Miranda; Patrick M A James; Dominique Tardif; Philip J Burton
Journal:  Curr For Rep       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 10.975

6.  A scalable model of vegetation transitions using deep neural networks.

Authors:  Werner Rammer; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 8.335

7.  Trade-offs between temporal stability and level of forest ecosystem services provisioning under climate change.

Authors:  Katharina Albrich; Werner Rammer; Dominik Thom; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 6.105

Review 8.  Tackling unresolved questions in forest ecology: The past and future role of simulation models.

Authors:  Isabelle Maréchaux; Fanny Langerwisch; Andreas Huth; Harald Bugmann; Xavier Morin; Christopher P O Reyer; Rupert Seidl; Alessio Collalti; Mateus Dantas de Paula; Rico Fischer; Martin Gutsch; Manfred J Lexer; Heike Lischke; Anja Rammig; Edna Rödig; Boris Sakschewski; Franziska Taubert; Kirsten Thonicke; Giorgio Vacchiano; Friedrich J Bohn
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.167

9.  Norway spruce at the trailing edge: the effect of landscape configuration and composition on climate resilience.

Authors:  Juha Honkaniemi; Werner Rammer; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Landsc Ecol       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 5.043

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.