Literature DB >> 28860678

Using Landsat time series for characterizing forest disturbance dynamics in the coupled human and natural systems of Central Europe.

Cornelius Senf1,2, Dirk Pflugmacher1, Patrick Hostert1,3, Rupert Seidl2.   

Abstract

Remote sensing is a key information source for improving the spatiotemporal understanding of forest ecosystem dynamics. Yet, the mapping and attribution of forest change remains challenging, particularly in areas where a number of interacting disturbance agents simultaneously affect forest development. The forest ecosystems of Central Europe are coupled human and natural systems, with natural and human disturbances affecting forests both individually and in combination. To better understand the complex forest disturbance dynamics in such systems, we utilize 32-year Landsat time series to map forest disturbances in five sites across Austria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Poland, and Slovakia. All sites consisted of a National Park and the surrounding forests, reflecting three management zones of different levels of human influence (managed, protected, strictly protected). This allowed for a comparison of spectral, temporal, and spatial disturbance patterns across a gradient from natural to coupled human and natural disturbances. Disturbance maps achieved overall accuracies ranging from 81% to 93%. Disturbance patches were generally small, with 95% of the disturbances being smaller than 10 ha. Disturbance rates ranged from 0.29% yr-1 to 0.95% yr-1, and differed substantially among management zones and study sites. Natural disturbances in strictly protected areas were longer in duration (median of 8 years) and slightly less variable in magnitude compared to human-dominated disturbances in managed forests (median duration of 1 year). However, temporal dynamics between natural and human-dominated disturbances showed strong synchrony, suggesting that disturbance peaks are driven by natural events affecting managed and unmanaged areas simultaneously. Our study demonstrates the potential of remote sensing for mapping forest disturbances in coupled human and natural systems, such as the forests of Central Europe. Yet, we also highlight the complexity of such systems in terms of agent attribution, as many natural disturbances are modified by management responding to them outside protected areas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bark beetle; Disturbance mapping; Forest management; Harvest; Landsat; Wind

Year:  2017        PMID: 28860678      PMCID: PMC5572776          DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens        ISSN: 0924-2716            Impact factor:   8.979


  13 in total

1.  Protected forests in Europe approaches-harmonising the definitions for international comparison and forest policy making.

Authors:  Jari Parviainen; Georg Frank
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  Disturbance and landscape dynamics in a changing world.

Authors:  Monica G Turner
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 3.  Salvage logging, ecosystem processes, and biodiversity conservation.

Authors:  D B Lindenmayer; R F Noss
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change.

Authors:  M C Hansen; P V Potapov; R Moore; M Hancher; S A Turubanova; A Tyukavina; D Thau; S V Stehman; S J Goetz; T R Loveland; A Kommareddy; A Egorov; L Chini; C O Justice; J R G Townshend
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Global satellite monitoring of climate-induced vegetation disturbances.

Authors:  Nate G McDowell; Nicholas C Coops; Pieter S A Beck; Jeffrey Q Chambers; Chandana Gangodagamage; Jeffrey A Hicke; Cho-ying Huang; Robert Kennedy; Dan J Krofcheck; Marcy Litvak; Arjan J H Meddens; Jordan Muss; Robinson Negrón-Juarez; Changhui Peng; Amanda M Schwantes; Jennifer J Swenson; Louis J Vernon; A Park Williams; Chonggang Xu; Maosheng Zhao; Steve W Running; Craig D Allen
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 18.313

6.  Shape selection in Landsat time series: a tool for monitoring forest dynamics.

Authors:  Gretchen G Moisen; Mary C Meyer; Todd A Schroeder; Xiyue Liao; Karen G Schleeweis; Elizabeth A Freeman; Chris Toney
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 10.863

7.  Increasing forest disturbances in Europe and their impact on carbon storage.

Authors:  Rupert Seidl; Mart-Jan Schelhaas; Werner Rammer; Pieter Johannes Verkerk
Journal:  Nat Clim Chang       Date:  2014-09-01

8.  Climate change amplifies the interactions between wind and bark beetle disturbances in forest landscapes.

Authors:  Rupert Seidl; Werner Rammer
Journal:  Landsc Ecol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 3.848

9.  Small beetle, large-scale drivers: how regional and landscape factors affect outbreaks of the European spruce bark beetle.

Authors:  Rupert Seidl; Jörg Müller; Torsten Hothorn; Claus Bässler; Marco Heurich; Markus Kautz
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 6.528

10.  New insights into the consequences of post-windthrow salvage logging revealed by functional structure of saproxylic beetles assemblages.

Authors:  Simon Thorn; Claus Bässler; Thomas Gottschalk; Torsten Hothorn; Heinz Bussler; Kenneth Raffa; Jörg Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Post-disturbance recovery of forest carbon in a temperate forest landscape under climate change.

Authors:  Laura Dobor; Tomáš Hlásny; Werner Rammer; Ivan Barka; Jiří Trombik; Pavol Pavlenda; Vladimír Šebeň; Petr Štepánek; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Agric For Meteorol       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 6.424

2.  Spatial configuration matters when removing windfelled trees to manage bark beetle disturbances in Central European forest landscapes.

Authors:  Laura Dobor; Tomáš Hlásny; Werner Rammer; Soňa Zimová; Ivan Barka; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 8.910

3.  Intensive ground vegetation growth mitigates the carbon loss after forest disturbance.

Authors:  Bernhard Zehetgruber; Johannes Kobler; Thomas Dirnböck; Robert Jandl; Rupert Seidl; Andreas Schindlbacher
Journal:  Plant Soil       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.192

4.  Actual European forest management by region, tree species and owner based on 714,000 re-measured trees in national forest inventories.

Authors:  Mart-Jan Schelhaas; Jonas Fridman; Geerten M Hengeveld; Helena M Henttonen; Aleksi Lehtonen; Uwe Kies; Nike Krajnc; Bas Lerink; Áine Ní Dhubháin; Heino Polley; Thomas A M Pugh; John J Redmond; Brigitte Rohner; Cristian Temperli; Jordi Vayreda; Gert-Jan Nabuurs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Do bark beetle outbreaks amplify or dampen future bark beetle disturbances in Central Europe?

Authors:  Andreas Sommerfeld; Werner Rammer; Marco Heurich; Torben Hilmers; Jörg Müller; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  J Ecol       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 6.381

6.  Accelerating Mountain Forest Dynamics in the Alps.

Authors:  Dominik Thom; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Ecosystems       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 4.345

7.  Natural disturbances are spatially diverse but temporally synchronized across temperate forest landscapes in Europe.

Authors:  Cornelius Senf; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 13.211

8.  Understanding the temporal dimension of the red-edge spectral region for forest decline detection using high-resolution hyperspectral and Sentinel-2a imagery.

Authors:  P J Zarco-Tejada; A Hornero; R Hernández-Clemente; P S A Beck
Journal:  ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 8.979

9.  Patterns and drivers of recent disturbances across the temperate forest biome.

Authors:  Andreas Sommerfeld; Cornelius Senf; Brian Buma; Anthony W D'Amato; Tiphaine Després; Ignacio Díaz-Hormazábal; Shawn Fraver; Lee E Frelich; Álvaro G Gutiérrez; Sarah J Hart; Brian J Harvey; Hong S He; Tomáš Hlásny; Andrés Holz; Thomas Kitzberger; Dominik Kulakowski; David Lindenmayer; Akira S Mori; Jörg Müller; Juan Paritsis; George L W Perry; Scott L Stephens; Miroslav Svoboda; Monica G Turner; Thomas T Veblen; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 17.694

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.