Literature DB >> 35633776

Post-disturbance recovery of forest carbon in a temperate forest landscape under climate change.

Laura Dobor1, Tomáš Hlásny1, Werner Rammer2, Ivan Barka3, Jiří Trombik1, Pavol Pavlenda3, Vladimír Šebeň3, Petr Štepánek4, Rupert Seidl2.   

Abstract

Disturbances alter composition, structure, and functioning of forest ecosystems, and their legacies persist for decades to centuries. We investigated how temperate forest landscapes may recover their carbon (C) after severe wind and bark beetle disturbance, while being exposed to climate change. We used the forest landscape and disturbance model iLand to quantify (i) the recovery times of the total ecosystem C, (ii) the effect of climate change on C recovery, and (iii) the differential factors contributing to C recovery. We reconstructed a recent disturbance episode (2008-2016) based on Landsat satellite imagery, which affected 39% of the forest area in the 16,000 ha study landscape. We subsequently simulated forest recovery under a continuation of business-asusual management until 2100. Our results indicated that the recovery of the pre-disturbance C stocks (C payback time) was reached 17 years after the end of the disturbance episode. The C stocks of a theoretical undisturbed development trajectory were reached 30 years after the disturbance episode (C sequestration parity). Drier and warmer climates delayed simulated C recovery. Without the fertilizing effect of CO2, C payback times were delayed by 5-9 years, while C parity was not reached within the 21st century. Recovery was accelerated by an enhanced C uptake compared to undisturbed conditions (disturbance legacy sink effect) that persisted for 35 years after the disturbance episode. Future climate could have negative impacts on forest recovery and thus further amplify climate change through C loss from ecosystems, but the effect is strongly contingent on the magnitude and persistence of alleviating CO2 effects. Our modelling study highlights the need to consider both negative and positive effects of disturbance (i.e., C loss immediately after an event vs. enhanced C uptake of the recovering forest) in order to obtain a comprehensive understanding of disturbance effects on the forest C cycle.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CO2 fertilization; Central Europe; Disturbance recovery; Forest carbon sink; Legacy sink; Norway spruce

Year:  2018        PMID: 35633776      PMCID: PMC7612774          DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.08.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Agric For Meteorol        ISSN: 0168-1923            Impact factor:   6.424


  34 in total

1.  Drought-induced reduction in global terrestrial net primary production from 2000 through 2009.

Authors:  Maosheng Zhao; Steven W Running
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Disturbance and landscape dynamics in a changing world.

Authors:  Monica G Turner
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 3.  The likely impact of elevated [CO2], nitrogen deposition, increased temperature and management on carbon sequestration in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems: a literature review.

Authors:  Riitta Hyvönen; Göran I Ågren; Sune Linder; Tryggve Persson; M Francesca Cotrufo; Alf Ekblad; Michael Freeman; Achim Grelle; Ivan A Janssens; Paul G Jarvis; Seppo Kellomäki; Anders Lindroth; Denis Loustau; Tomas Lundmark; Richard J Norby; Ram Oren; Kim Pilegaard; Michael G Ryan; Bjarni D Sigurdsson; Monika Strömgren; Marcel van Oijen; Göran Wallin
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 10.151

4.  The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment.

Authors:  Richard H Moss; Jae A Edmonds; Kathy A Hibbard; Martin R Manning; Steven K Rose; Detlef P van Vuuren; Timothy R Carter; Seita Emori; Mikiko Kainuma; Tom Kram; Gerald A Meehl; John F B Mitchell; Nebojsa Nakicenovic; Keywan Riahi; Steven J Smith; Ronald J Stouffer; Allison M Thomson; John P Weyant; Thomas J Wilbanks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The impact of future forest dynamics on climate: interactive effects of changing vegetation and disturbance regimes.

Authors:  Dominik Thom; Werner Rammer; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Ecol Monogr       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 10.315

6.  Searching for resilience: addressing the impacts of changing disturbance regimes on forest ecosystem services.

Authors:  Rupert Seidl; Thomas A Spies; David L Peterson; Scott L Stephens; Jeffrey A Hicke
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 6.865

7.  A walk on the wild side: Disturbance dynamics and the conservation and management of European mountain forest ecosystems.

Authors:  Dominik Kulakowski; Rupert Seidl; Jan Holeksa; Timo Kuuluvainen; Thomas A Nagel; Momchil Panayotov; Miroslav Svoboda; Simon Thorn; Giorgio Vacchiano; Cathy Whitlock; Thomas Wohlgemuth; Peter Bebi
Journal:  For Ecol Manage       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Using Landsat time series for characterizing forest disturbance dynamics in the coupled human and natural systems of Central Europe.

Authors:  Cornelius Senf; Dirk Pflugmacher; Patrick Hostert; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 8.979

9.  The historical disturbance regime of mountain Norway spruce forests in the Western Carpathians and its influence on current forest structure and composition.

Authors:  Pavel Janda; Volodymyr Trotsiuk; Martin Mikoláš; Radek Bače; Thomas A Nagel; Rupert Seidl; Meelis Seedre; Robert C Morrissey; Stanislav Kucbel; Peter Jaloviar; Marián Jasík; Juraj Vysoký; Pavel Šamonil; Vojtěch Čada; Hana Mrhalová; Jana Lábusová; Markéta H Nováková; Miloš Rydval; Lenka Matějů; Miroslav Svoboda
Journal:  For Ecol Manage       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Persistent reduced ecosystem respiration after insect disturbance in high elevation forests.

Authors:  David J P Moore; Nicole A Trahan; Phil Wilkes; Tristan Quaife; Britton B Stephens; Kelly Elder; Ankur R Desai; Jose Negron; Russell K Monson
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 9.492

View more
  2 in total

1.  Reducing rotation age to address increasing disturbances in Central Europe: Potential and limitations.

Authors:  Soňa Zimová; Laura Dobor; Tomáš Hlásny; Werner Rammer; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  For Ecol Manage       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.384

2.  Spatial configuration matters when removing windfelled trees to manage bark beetle disturbances in Central European forest landscapes.

Authors:  Laura Dobor; Tomáš Hlásny; Werner Rammer; Soňa Zimová; Ivan Barka; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 8.910

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.