Literature DB >> 35645457

What drives the future supply of regulating ecosystem services in a mountain forest landscape?

Rupert Seidl1, Katharina Albrich1, Karlheinz Erb2, Herbert Formayer3, David Leidinger3, Georg Leitinger2, Ulrike Tappeiner4,5, Erich Tasser5, Werner Rammer1.   

Abstract

Forest ecosystems provide a wide variety of ecosystem services to society. In harsh mountain environments, the regulating services of forests are of particular importance. Managing mountain forests for regulating services is a cost- and labor intensive endeavor. Yet, also unmanaged forests regulate the environment. In the context of evidence-based decision making it is thus important to scrutinize if current management recommendations improve the supply of regulating ecosystem services over unmanaged development trajectories. A further issue complicating decision making in the context of regulating ecosystem services is their high sensitivity to climate change. Climate-mediated increases in natural disturbances, for instance, could strongly reduce the supply of regulating services from forests in the future. Given the profound environmental changes expected for the coming decades it remains unclear whether forest management will still be able to significantly control the future trajectories of mountain forest development, or whether the management effect will be superseded by a much stronger climate and disturbance effect. Here, our objectives were (i) to quantify the future regulating service supply from a 6456 ha landscape in the Stubai valley in Tyrol, Austria, and (ii) to assess the relative importance of management, climate, and natural disturbances on the future supply of regulating ecosystem services. We focused our analysis on climate regulation, water regulation, and erosion regulation, and used the landscape simulation model iLand to quantify their development under different climate scenarios and management strategies. Our results show that unmanaged forests are efficient in providing regulating ecosystem services. Both climate regulation and erosion regulation were higher in unmanaged systems compared to managed systems, while water regulation was slightly enhanced by management. Overall, direct effects of climate change had a stronger influence on the future supply of regulating services than management and natural disturbances. The ability of management to control ecosystem service supply decreased sharply with the severity of future climate change. This finding highlights that forest management could be severely stymied in the future if climate change continues to proceed at its current rate. An improved quantitative understanding of the drivers of future ecosystem service supply is needed to more effectively combine targeted management efforts and natural ecosystem dynamics towards sustaining the benefits society derives from forests in a rapidly changing world.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon storage; Climate change impacts; Erosion protection; LTER; Mountain forests; Natural disturbances; Silviculture; Water regulation; iLand

Year:  2019        PMID: 35645457      PMCID: PMC7612773          DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.03.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  For Ecol Manage        ISSN: 0378-1127            Impact factor:   4.384


  27 in total

1.  The sensitivity of current and future forest managers to climate-induced changes in ecological processes.

Authors:  Rupert Seidl; Filip Aggestam; Werner Rammer; Kristina Blennow; Bernhard Wolfslehner
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Forest management under climatic and social uncertainty: trade-offs between reducing climate change impacts and fostering adaptive capacity.

Authors:  Rupert Seidl; Manfred J Lexer
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 6.789

3.  Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change.

Authors:  W A Kurz; C C Dymond; G Stinson; G J Rampley; E T Neilson; A L Carroll; T Ebata; L Safranyik
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Influence of climate on radial growth of Pinus cembra within the alpine timberline ecotone.

Authors:  Walter Oberhuber
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.196

5.  Disturbances catalyze the adaptation of forest ecosystems to changing climate conditions.

Authors:  Dominik Thom; Werner Rammer; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 10.863

6.  The impacts of climate change and disturbance on spatio-temporal trajectories of biodiversity in a temperate forest landscape.

Authors:  Dominik Thom; Werner Rammer; Thomas Dirnböck; Jörg Müller; Johannes Kobler; Klaus Katzensteiner; Norbert Helm; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 6.528

7.  Trade-offs between temporal stability and level of forest ecosystem services provisioning under climate change.

Authors:  Katharina Albrich; Werner Rammer; Dominik Thom; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 6.105

8.  Influence of Land-Use Intensification on Vegetation C-Stocks in an Alpine Valley from 1865 to 2003.

Authors:  Maria Niedertscheider; Erich Tasser; Monika Patek; Johannes Rüdisser; Ulrike Tappeiner; Karl-Heinz Erb
Journal:  Ecosystems       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 4.217

9.  Forest disturbances under climate change.

Authors:  Rupert Seidl; Dominik Thom; Markus Kautz; Dario Martin-Benito; Mikko Peltoniemi; Giorgio Vacchiano; Jan Wild; Davide Ascoli; Michal Petr; Juha Honkaniemi; Manfred J Lexer; Volodymyr Trotsiuk; Paola Mairota; Miroslav Svoboda; Marek Fabrika; Thomas A Nagel; Christopher P O Reyer
Journal:  Nat Clim Chang       Date:  2017-05-31

10.  Forest stand growth dynamics in Central Europe have accelerated since 1870.

Authors:  Hans Pretzsch; Peter Biber; Gerhard Schütze; Enno Uhl; Thomas Rötzer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  3 in total

1.  What drives the future supply of regulating ecosystem services in a mountain forest landscape?

Authors:  Rupert Seidl; Katharina Albrich; Karlheinz Erb; Herbert Formayer; David Leidinger; Georg Leitinger; Ulrike Tappeiner; Erich Tasser; Werner Rammer
Journal:  For Ecol Manage       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.384

2.  Can wildland fire management alter 21st-century subalpine fire and forests in Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming, USA?

Authors:  Winslow D Hansen; Diane Abendroth; Werner Rammer; Rupert Seidl; Monica G Turner
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 6.105

3.  Accelerating Mountain Forest Dynamics in the Alps.

Authors:  Dominik Thom; Rupert Seidl
Journal:  Ecosystems       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 4.345

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.