Literature DB >> 28804729

Organ dose variability and trends in tomosynthesis and radiography.

Jocelyn Hoye1,2,3,4, Yakun Zhang1,2,4, Greeshma Agasthya1,2,4, Greg Sturgeon1,2,4, Anuj Kapadia1,2,3,4, W Paul Segars1,2,3,4, Ehsan Samei1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate relationships between patient attributes and organ dose for a population of computational phantoms for 20 tomosynthesis and radiography protocols. Organ dose was estimated from 54 adult computational phantoms (age: 18 to 78 years, weight 52 to 117 kg) using a validated Monte-Carlo simulation (PENELOPE) of a system capable of performing tomosynthesis and radiography. The geometry and field of view for each exam were modeled to match clinical protocols. For each protocol, the energy deposited in each organ was estimated by the simulations, converted to dose units, and then normalized by exposure in air. Dose to radiosensitive organs was studied as a function of average patient thickness in the region of interest and as a function of body mass index. For tomosynthesis, organ doses were also studied as a function of x-ray tube position. This work developed comprehensive information for organ dose dependencies across a range of tomosynthesis and radiography protocols. The results showed a protocol-dependent exponential decrease with an increasing patient size. There was a variability in organ dose across the patient population, which should be incorporated in the metrology of organ dose. The results can be used to prospectively and retrospectively estimate organ dose for tomosynthesis and radiography.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monte Carlo; dose; patient-specific; radiation; radiography; tomosynthesis

Year:  2017        PMID: 28804729      PMCID: PMC5551447          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.3.031207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  17 in total

1.  Falling prey to the sunk cost bias: a potential harm of patient radiation dose histories.

Authors:  Jonathan D Eisenberg; H Benjamin Harvey; Donald A Moore; G Scott Gazelle; Pari V Pandharipande
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  The feasibility of a scanner-independent technique to estimate organ dose from MDCT scans: using CTDIvol to account for differences between scanners.

Authors:  Adam C Turner; Maria Zankl; John J DeMarco; Chris H Cagnon; Di Zhang; Erin Angel; Dianna D Cody; Donna M Stevens; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Managing radiation use in medical imaging: a multifaceted challenge.

Authors:  Hedvig Hricak; David J Brenner; S James Adelstein; Donald P Frush; Eric J Hall; Roger W Howell; Cynthia H McCollough; Fred A Mettler; Mark S Pearce; Orhan H Suleiman; James H Thrall; Louis K Wagner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine.

Authors:  E Stephen Amis; Priscilla F Butler; Kimberly E Applegate; Steven B Birnbaum; Libby F Brateman; James M Hevezi; Fred A Mettler; Richard L Morin; Michael J Pentecost; Geoffrey G Smith; Keith J Strauss; Robert K Zeman
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  A Monte Carlo estimation of effective dose in chest tomosynthesis.

Authors:  John M Sabol
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Whole-Body Clinical Applications of Digital Tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Haruhiko Machida; Toshiyuki Yuhara; Mieko Tamura; Takuya Ishikawa; Etsuko Tate; Eiko Ueno; Katelyn Nye; John M Sabol
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Comparison of patient specific dose metrics between chest radiography, tomosynthesis, and CT for adult patients of wide ranging body habitus.

Authors:  Yakun Zhang; Xiang Li; W Paul Segars; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk estimation in CT: part I. development and validation of a Monte Carlo program.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Ehsan Samei; W Paul Segars; Gregory M Sturgeon; James G Colsher; Greta Toncheva; Terry T Yoshizumi; Donald P Frush
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Effective dose to patients from chest examinations with tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Magnus Båth; Angelica Svalkvist; Alexa von Wrangel; Heidi Rismyhr-Olsson; Ake Cederblad
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 0.972

10.  Calculation of effective dose.

Authors:  C H McCollough; B A Schueler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  3 in total

1.  Organ doses from CT localizer radiographs: Development, validation, and application of a Monte Carlo estimation technique.

Authors:  Jocelyn Hoye; Shobhit Sharma; Yakun Zhang; Wanyi Fu; Francesco Ria; Anuj Kapadia; W Paul Segars; Joshua Wilson; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A GPU-accelerated framework for individualized estimation of organ doses in digital tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Shobhit Sharma; Anuj Kapadia; Justin Brown; William Paul Segars; Wesley Bolch; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Dose coefficients for organ dosimetry in tomosynthesis imaging of adults and pediatrics across diverse protocols.

Authors:  Shobhit Sharma; Anuj Kapadia; Francesco Ria; W Paul Segars; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.506

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.