Literature DB >> 10841384

Calculation of effective dose.

C H McCollough1, B A Schueler.   

Abstract

The concept of "effective dose" was introduced in 1975 to provide a mechanism for assessing the radiation detriment from partial body irradiations in terms of data derived from whole body irradiations. The effective dose is the mean absorbed dose from a uniform whole-body irradiation that results in the same total radiation detriment as from the nonuniform, partial-body irradiation in question. The effective dose is calculated as the weighted average of the mean absorbed dose to the various body organs and tissues, where the weighting factor is the radiation detriment for a given organ (from a whole-body irradiation) as a fraction of the total radiation detriment. In this review, effective dose equivalent and effective dose, as established by the International Commission on Radiological Protection in 1977 and 1990, respectively, are defined and various methods of calculating these quantities are presented for radionuclides, radiography, fluoroscopy, computed tomography and mammography. In order to calculate either quantity, it is first necessary to estimate the radiation dose to individual organs. One common method of determining organ doses is through Monte Carlo simulations of photon interactions within a simplified mathematical model of the human body. Several groups have performed these calculations and published their results in the form of data tables of organ dose per unit activity or exposure. These data tables are specified according to particular examination parameters, such as radiopharmaceutical, x-ray projection, x-ray beam energy spectra or patient size. Sources of these organ dose conversion coefficients are presented and differences between them are examined. The estimates of effective dose equivalent or effective dose calculated using these data, although not intended to describe the dose to an individual, can be used as a relative measure of stochastic radiation detriment. The calculated values, in units of sievert (or rem), indicate the amount of whole-body irradiation that would yield the equivalent radiation detriment as the exam in question. In this manner, the detriment associated with partial or organ-specific irradiations, as are common in diagnostic radiology, can be assessed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10841384     DOI: 10.1118/1.598948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  42 in total

1.  Achieving routine submillisievert CT scanning: report from the summit on management of radiation dose in CT.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Guang Hong Chen; Willi Kalender; Shuai Leng; Ehsan Samei; Katsuyuki Taguchi; Ge Wang; Lifeng Yu; Roderic I Pettigrew
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Is routine pelvic surveillance imaging necessary in patients with Wilms tumor?

Authors:  Sue C Kaste; Samuel L Brady; Brian Yee; Valerie J McPherson; Robert A Kaufman; Catherine A Billups; Najat C Daw; Alberto S Pappo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Xin Liu; Shuai Leng; James M Kofler; Juan C Ramirez-Giraldo; Mingliang Qu; Jodie Christner; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2009-10

4.  Radiation exposure of patients in comprehensive computed tomography of the head in acute stroke.

Authors:  M Cohnen; H-J Wittsack; S Assadi; K Muskalla; A Ringelstein; L W Poll; A Saleh; U Mödder
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Techniques and parameters for estimating radiation exposure and dose in cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Thomas C Gerber; Ronald S Kuzo; Richard L Morin
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Estimating radiation risk from computed tomography scanning.

Authors:  Vadim Fayngersh; Michael Passero
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.584

7.  Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT.

Authors:  Walter Huda; Kent M Ogden; Mohammad R Khorasani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Age-specific effective doses for pediatric MSCT examinations at a large children's hospital using DLP conversion coefficients: a simple estimation method.

Authors:  Karen E Thomas; Bo Wang
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-04-08

9.  Diagnostic ionizing radiation exposure in a population-based cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Joanna M Peloquin; Darrell S Pardi; William J Sandborn; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough; Beth A Schueler; James A Kofler; Felicity T B Enders; Sara J Achenbach; Edward V Loftus
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  The role of chest computed tomography (CT) as a surveillance tool in children with high-risk neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Sara M Federico; Samuel L Brady; Alberto Pappo; Jianrong Wu; Shenghua Mao; Valerie J McPherson; Alison Young; Wayne L Furman; Robert Kaufman; Sue Kaste
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.