Literature DB >> 20233755

Effective dose to patients from chest examinations with tomosynthesis.

Magnus Båth1, Angelica Svalkvist, Alexa von Wrangel, Heidi Rismyhr-Olsson, Ake Cederblad.   

Abstract

Chest tomosynthesis, which refers to the principle of collecting low-dose projections of the chest at different angles and using these projections to reconstruct section images of the chest, is an imaging technique recently introduced to health care. The main purpose of the present work was to determine the average effective dose to patients from clinical use of chest tomosynthesis. Exposure data for two chest radiography laboratories with tomosynthesis option (Definium 8000 with VolumeRAD option, GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, UK) were registered for 20 patients with a weight between 60 and 80 kg (average weight of 70.2 kg). The recorded data were used in the Monte Carlo program PCXMC 2.0 (STUK-Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, Helsinki, Finland) to determine the average effective dose for each projection. The effective dose for the chest tomosynthesis examination, including a scout view and the tomosynthesis acquisition, was finally obtained by adding the effective doses from all projections. Using the weighting factors given in ICRP 103, the average effective dose for the examination was found to be 0.13 mSv, whereas the average effective dose for the conventional two-view chest radiography examination was 0.05 mSv. A conversion factor of 0.26 mSv Gy(-1) cm(-2) was found suitable for determining the effective dose from a VolumeRAD chest tomosynthesis examination from the total registered kerma-area product. In conclusion, the effective dose to a standard-sized patient (170 cm/70 kg) from a VolumeRAD chest tomosynthesis examination is ~2 % of an average chest CT and only two to three times the effective dose from the conventional two-view chest radiography examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20233755     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncq092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  24 in total

1.  Dose estimation of ultra-low-dose chest CT to different sized adult patients.

Authors:  Tony M Svahn; Tommy Sjöberg; Jennifer C Ast
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Technical innovation: digital tomosynthesis of the hip following intra-articular administration of contrast.

Authors:  Roland E Gazaille; Michael J Flynn; Walter Page; Sonia Finley; Marnix van Holsbeeck
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Evaluation of a new system for chest tomosynthesis: aspects of image quality of different protocols determined using an anthropomorphic phantom.

Authors:  M Jadidi; A Sundin; P Aspelin; M Båth; S Nyrén
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Organ dose variability and trends in tomosynthesis and radiography.

Authors:  Jocelyn Hoye; Yakun Zhang; Greeshma Agasthya; Greg Sturgeon; Anuj Kapadia; W Paul Segars; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-08-01

5.  Comparison of digital tomosynthesis and computed tomography for lung nodule detection in SOS screening program.

Authors:  Maurizio Grosso; Roberto Priotto; Donatella Ghirardo; Alberto Talenti; Emanuele Roberto; Luca Bertolaccini; Alberto Terzi; Stéphane Chauvie
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Comparison of patient specific dose metrics between chest radiography, tomosynthesis, and CT for adult patients of wide ranging body habitus.

Authors:  Yakun Zhang; Xiang Li; W Paul Segars; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Effect of radiation dose level on the detectability of pulmonary nodules in chest tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Sara A Asplund; Åse A Johnsson; Jenny Vikgren; Angelica Svalkvist; Agneta Flinck; Marianne Boijsen; Valeria A Fisichella; Lars Gunnar Månsson; Magnus Båth
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Digital chest tomosynthesis: the 2017 updated review of an emerging application.

Authors:  Arianna Ferrari; Luca Bertolaccini; Piergiorgio Solli; Paola Oriana Di Salvia; David Scaradozzi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

9.  Digital tomosynthesis of the chest: comparison of patient exposure dose and image quality between standard default setting and low dose setting.

Authors:  Hye Sun Hwang; Myung Jin Chung; Kyung Soo Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Initial clinical evaluation of stationary digital chest tomosynthesis in adult patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Elias Taylor Gunnell; Dora K Franceschi; Christina R Inscoe; Allison Hartman; Jennifer L Goralski; Agathe Ceppe; Brian Handly; Cassandra Sams; Lynn Ansley Fordham; Jianping Lu; Otto Zhou; Yueh Z Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.