Literature DB >> 27163590

Whole-Body Clinical Applications of Digital Tomosynthesis.

Haruhiko Machida1, Toshiyuki Yuhara1, Mieko Tamura1, Takuya Ishikawa1, Etsuko Tate1, Eiko Ueno1, Katelyn Nye1, John M Sabol1.   

Abstract

With flat-panel detector mammography, radiography, and fluoroscopy systems, digital tomosynthesis (DT) has been recently introduced as an advanced clinical application that removes overlying structures, enhances local tissue separation, and provides depth information about structures of interest by providing high-quality tomographic images. DT images are generated from projection image data, typically using filtered back-projection or iterative reconstruction. These low-dose x-ray projection images are easily and swiftly acquired over a range of angles during a single linear or arc sweep of the x-ray tube assembly. DT is advantageous in a variety of clinical contexts, including breast, chest, head and neck, orthopedic, emergency, and abdominal imaging. Specifically, compared with conventional mammography, radiography, and fluoroscopy, as a result of reduced tissue overlap DT can improve detection of breast cancer, pulmonary nodules, sinonasal mucosal thickening, and bone fractures and delineation of complex anatomic structures such as the ostiomeatal unit, atlantoaxial joint, carpal and tarsal bones, and pancreatobiliary and gastrointestinal tracts. Compared with computed tomography, DT offers reduced radiation exposure, better in-plane resolution to improve assessment of fine bony changes, and less metallic artifact, improving postoperative evaluation of patients with metallic prostheses and osteosynthesis materials. With more flexible patient positioning, DT is also useful for functional, weight-bearing, and stress tests. To optimize patient management, a comprehensive understanding of the clinical applications and limitations of whole-body DT applications is important for improvement of diagnostic quality, workflow, and cost-effectiveness. Online supplemental material is available for this article. (©)RSNA, 2016.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27163590     DOI: 10.1148/rg.2016150184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  11 in total

1.  Interpretation of digital breast tomosynthesis: preliminary study on comparison with picture archiving and communication system (PACS) and dedicated workstation.

Authors:  Young Seon Kim; Jung Min Chang; Ann Yi; Sung Ui Shin; Myung Eun Lee; Won Hwa Kim; Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Organ dose variability and trends in tomosynthesis and radiography.

Authors:  Jocelyn Hoye; Yakun Zhang; Greeshma Agasthya; Greg Sturgeon; Anuj Kapadia; W Paul Segars; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-08-01

3.  Comparison of radiographs, tomosynthesis and CT with metal artifact reduction for the detection of hip prosthetic loosening.

Authors:  Romain Gillet; Pedro Teixeira; Chloé Bonarelli; Henry Coudane; François Sirveaux; Mathias Louis; Alain Blum
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Initial evaluation of image performance of a 3-D x-ray system: phantom-based comparison of 3-D tomography with conventional computed tomography.

Authors:  Robyn Melanie Benz; Meritxell Alzamora Garcia; Felix Amsler; Johannes Voigt; Andreas Fieselmann; Anna Lucja Falkowski; Bram Stieltjes; Anna Hirschmann
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-03-06

Review 5.  Digital chest tomosynthesis: the 2017 updated review of an emerging application.

Authors:  Arianna Ferrari; Luca Bertolaccini; Piergiorgio Solli; Paola Oriana Di Salvia; David Scaradozzi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

6.  Assessment of vertebral wedge strength using cancellous textural properties derived from digital tomosynthesis and density properties from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and high resolution computed tomography.

Authors:  Yener N Yeni; Woong Kim; Daniel Oravec; Mary Nixon; George W Divine; Michael J Flynn
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  A GPU-accelerated framework for individualized estimation of organ doses in digital tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Shobhit Sharma; Anuj Kapadia; Justin Brown; William Paul Segars; Wesley Bolch; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Dose coefficients for organ dosimetry in tomosynthesis imaging of adults and pediatrics across diverse protocols.

Authors:  Shobhit Sharma; Anuj Kapadia; Francesco Ria; W Paul Segars; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.506

9.  Emphasizing the Diagnostic Value of Digital Tomosynthesis in Detecting Hip Fractures.

Authors:  Cory Ozimok; David Koff; Naveen Parasu
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2020-09

Review 10.  Advanced Bronchoscopic Technologies for Biopsy of the Pulmonary Nodule: A 2021 Review.

Authors:  Micah Z Levine; Sam Goodman; Robert J Lentz; Fabien Maldonado; Otis B Rickman; James Katsis
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.