Literature DB >> 34902159

A GPU-accelerated framework for individualized estimation of organ doses in digital tomosynthesis.

Shobhit Sharma1,2, Anuj Kapadia1,2, Justin Brown3, William Paul Segars1,4, Wesley Bolch3, Ehsan Samei1,2,4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Estimation of organ doses in digital tomosynthesis (DT) is challenging due to the lack of existing tools that accurately and flexibly model protocol- and view-specific collimations and motion trajectories of the source and detector for a variety of exam protocols, and the computational inefficiencies of conducting MC simulations. The purpose of this study was to overcome these limitations by developing and benchmarking a GPU-accelerated MC simulation framework compatible with patient-specific computational phantoms for individualized estimation of organ doses in DT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The framework for individualized estimation of dose in DT was developed as a two-step workflow: (1) a custom MATLAB code that accepts a patient-specific computational phantom and exam description (organ markers for defining the extremities of the anatomical region of interest, tube voltage, source-to-image distance, angular sweep range, number of projection views, and the pivot point to image distance - PPID) to compute the field of views (FOVs) for a clinical DT system, and (2) a MC tool (developed using MC-GPU) modeling the configuration of a clinical DT system to estimate organ doses based on the computed FOVs. Using this framework, we estimated organ doses for 28 radiosensitive organs in an adult reference patient model (M; 30 years) imaged using a commercial DT system (VolumeRad, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI). The estimates were benchmarked against values from a comparable organ dose estimation framework (reference dataset developed by the Advanced Laboratory for Radiation Dosimetry Studies at University of Florida) for a posterior-anterior chest exam. The resulting differences were quantified as percent relative errors and analyzed to identify any potential sources of bias and uncertainties. The timing performance (run duration in seconds) of the framework was also quantified for the same simulation to gauge the feasibility of the workflow for time-constrained clinical applications.
RESULTS: The organ dose estimates from the developed framework showed a close agreement with the reference dataset, with percent relative errors ranging from -6.9% to 5.0% and a mean absolute percent difference of 1.7% over all radiosensitive organs, with the exception of testes and eye lens, for which the percent relative errors were higher at -18.9% and -27.6%, respectively, due to their relative positioning outside the primary irradiation field, leading to fewer photons depositing energy and consequently higher errors in estimated organ doses. The run duration for the same simulation was 916.3 s, representing a substantial improvement in performance over existing nonparallelized MC tools.
CONCLUSIONS: This study successfully developed and benchmarked a GPU-accelerated framework compatible with patient-specific anthropomorphic computational phantoms for accurate individualized estimation of organ doses in DT. By enabling patient-specific estimation of organ doses, this framework can aid clinicians and researchers by providing them with tools essential for tracking the radiation burden to patients for dose monitoring purposes and identifying the trends and relationships in organ doses for a patient population to optimize existing and develop new exam protocols.
© 2021 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monte Carlo; radiation dosimetry and risk; tomosynthesis

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34902159      PMCID: PMC8828666          DOI: 10.1002/mp.15400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  24 in total

1.  How effective is effective dose as a predictor of radiation risk?

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Jodie A Christner; James M Kofler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Response functions for computing absorbed dose to skeletal tissues from photon irradiation--an update.

Authors:  Perry B Johnson; Amir A Bahadori; Keith F Eckerman; Choonsik Lee; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Validation of a Monte Carlo tool for patient-specific dose simulations in multi-slice computed tomography.

Authors:  Paul Deak; Marcel van Straten; Paul C Shrimpton; Maria Zankl; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Simple method for computing scattered radiation in breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Oliver Diaz; Premkumar Elangovan; Kenneth C Young; Kevin Wells; David R Dance
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Comparison of patient specific dose metrics between chest radiography, tomosynthesis, and CT for adult patients of wide ranging body habitus.

Authors:  Yakun Zhang; Xiang Li; W Paul Segars; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  The UF/NCI family of hybrid computational phantoms representing the current US population of male and female children, adolescents, and adults--application to CT dosimetry.

Authors:  Amy M Geyer; Shannon O'Reilly; Choonsik Lee; Daniel J Long; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Calculation of effective dose.

Authors:  C H McCollough; B A Schueler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Chest tomosynthesis: technical principles and clinical update.

Authors:  James T Dobbins; H Page McAdams
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  iPhantom: A Framework for Automated Creation of Individualized Computational Phantoms and Its Application to CT Organ Dosimetry.

Authors:  Wanyi Fu; Shobhit Sharma; Ehsan Abadi; Alexandros-Stavros Iliopoulos; Qi Wang; Joseph Y Lo; Xiaobai Sun; William P Segars; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 7.021

10.  Screening Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography in Community Practice by Patient Age, Screening Round, and Breast Density.

Authors:  Kathryn P Lowry; Rebecca Yates Coley; Diana L Miglioretti; Karla Kerlikowske; Louise M Henderson; Tracy Onega; Brian L Sprague; Janie M Lee; Sally Herschorn; Anna N A Tosteson; Garth Rauscher; Christoph I Lee
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-07-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Dose coefficients for organ dosimetry in tomosynthesis imaging of adults and pediatrics across diverse protocols.

Authors:  Shobhit Sharma; Anuj Kapadia; Francesco Ria; W Paul Segars; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.506

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.