Literature DB >> 28795834

Contrasting gist-based and template-based guidance during real-world visual search.

Brett Bahle1, Michi Matsukura1, Andrew Hollingworth1.   

Abstract

Visual search through real-world scenes is guided both by a representation of target features and by knowledge of the sematic properties of the scene (derived from scene gist recognition). In 3 experiments, we compared the relative roles of these 2 sources of guidance. Participants searched for a target object in the presence of a critical distractor object. The color of the critical distractor either matched or mismatched (a) the color of an item maintained in visual working memory for a secondary task (Experiment 1), or (b) the color of the target, cued by a picture before search commenced (Experiments 2 and 3). Capture of gaze by a matching distractor served as an index of template guidance. There were 4 main findings: (a) The distractor match effect was observed from the first saccade on the scene, (b) it was independent of the availability of scene-level gist-based guidance, (c) it was independent of whether the distractor appeared in a plausible location for the target, and (d) it was preserved even when gist-based guidance was available before scene onset. Moreover, gist-based, semantic guidance of gaze to target-plausible regions of the scene was delayed relative to template-based guidance. These results suggest that feature-based template guidance is not limited to plausible scene regions after an initial, scene-level analysis. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28795834      PMCID: PMC5809241          DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  47 in total

1.  The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.

Authors:  R Houtkamp; P R Roelfsema
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Beyond scene gist: Objects guide search more than scene background.

Authors:  Kathryn Koehler; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Searching for two things at once: establishment of multiple attentional control settings on a trial-by-trial basis.

Authors:  Zachary J J Roper; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

Review 4.  Where do we store the memory representations that guide attention?

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Nancy B Carlisle; Robert M G Reinhart
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Failure to detect meaning in RSVP at 27 ms per picture.

Authors:  John F Maguire; Piers D L Howe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 7.  Visual search in scenes involves selective and nonselective pathways.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Melissa L-H Võ; Karla K Evans; Michelle R Greene
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Task specificity and the influence of memory on visual search: comment on Võ and Wolfe (2012).

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Visual working memory modulates rapid eye movements to simple onset targets.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Michi Matsukura; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-03-18

10.  What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  7 in total

1.  The architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention.

Authors:  Brett Bahle; Valerie M Beck; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Visuospatial Working Memory as a Fundamental Component of the Eye Movement System.

Authors:  Stefan Van der Stigchel; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-03-20

3.  Benefits from negative templates in easy and difficult search depend on rapid distractor rejection and enhanced guidance.

Authors:  Ziyao Zhang; Renee Sahatdjian; Nancy B Carlisle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 1.984

4.  Visual working memory and action: Functional links and bi-directional influences.

Authors:  Freek van Ede
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2020-05-12

5.  Influences of luminance contrast and ambient lighting on visual context learning and retrieval.

Authors:  Xuelian Zang; Lingyun Huang; Xiuna Zhu; Hermann J Müller; Zhuanghua Shi
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  When more is more: redundant modifiers can facilitate visual search.

Authors:  Gwendolyn Rehrig; Reese A Cullimore; John M Henderson; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-02-17

7.  Meaning and expected surfaces combine to guide attention during visual search in scenes.

Authors:  Candace E Peacock; Deborah A Cronin; Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 2.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.