Literature DB >> 35462088

Benefits from negative templates in easy and difficult search depend on rapid distractor rejection and enhanced guidance.

Ziyao Zhang1, Renee Sahatdjian2, Nancy B Carlisle3.   

Abstract

While most research on attentional templates focuses on how attention can be guided toward targets, a growing body of research has been examining our ability to guide attention away from distractors using negative templates. A recent report showed larger reaction time benefits from negative templates during a difficult search task compared to an easy search task. However, it remains unclear what shifts in attentional processing led to these differences in reaction time benefits. In the current study, we tested the predictions of enhanced guidance and rapid rejection as potential explanations for the differential impact of negative templates based on search difficulty. In Experiment 1, we replicated the larger benefits from negative templates in a within-subjects design. In Experiment 2, we use eye tracking to measure the proportion of fixations directed towards target-colored distractors as an index of enhanced guidance and the dwell time on distractors as a measure of rapid rejection. We found more attentional guidance from negative templates in the difficult search condition. In addition, we found larger benefits of rapid rejection from negative templates in the difficult search condition. While we typically focus on templates as a way of guiding attention, these results highlight another key role played by attentional templates: rapid distractor rejection.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Attentional Templates; Negative Templates; Templates for Rejection; Visual Search

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35462088      PMCID: PMC9262813          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2022.108031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.984


  35 in total

1.  Attentional capture by a perceptually salient non-target facilitates target processing through inhibition and rapid rejection.

Authors:  Joy J Geng; Nicholas E Diquattro
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search.

Authors:  J M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-06

3.  Visual search with varying versus consistent attentional templates: Effects on target template establishment, comparison, and guidance.

Authors:  Rebecca R Goldstein; Melissa R Beck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Probing early attention following negative and positive templates.

Authors:  Ziyao Zhang; Nicholas Gapelin; Nancy B Carlisle
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Templates for rejection: configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features.

Authors:  Jason T Arita; Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Attentional templates in visual working memory.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Jason T Arita; Deborah Pardo; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  From reactive to proactive and selective control: developing a richer model for stopping inappropriate responses.

Authors:  Adam R Aron
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Attentional Guidance and Match Decisions Rely on Different Template Information During Visual Search.

Authors:  Xinger Yu; Timothy D Hanks; Joy J Geng
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-12-08

Review 9.  Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02-05

Review 10.  Flexibility in Attentional Control: Multiple Sources and Suppression.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2019-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.