Literature DB >> 27048442

Failure to detect meaning in RSVP at 27 ms per picture.

John F Maguire1, Piers D L Howe2.   

Abstract

The human visual system has the remarkable ability to rapidly detect meaning from visual stimuli. Potter, Wyble, Hagmann, and McCourt (Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 270-279, 2014) tested the minimum viewing time required to obtain meaning from a stream of pictures shown in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) sequence containing either six or 12 pictures. They reported that observers could detect the presence of a target picture specified by name (e.g., smiling couple) even when the pictures in the sequence were presented for just 13 ms each. Potter et al. claimed that this was insufficient time for feedback processing to occur, so feedforward processing alone must be able to generate conscious awareness of the target pictures. A potential confound in their study is that the pictures in the RSVP sequence sometime contained areas with no high-contrast edges, and so may not have adequately masked each other. Consequently, iconic memories of portions of the target pictures may have persisted in the visual system, thereby increasing the effective presentation time. Our study addressed this issue by redoing the Potter et al. study, but using four different types of masks. We found that when adequate masking was used, no evidence emerged that observers could detect the presence of a specific target picture, even when each picture in the RSVP sequence was presented for 27 ms. On the basis of these findings, we cannot rule out the possibility that feedback processing is necessary for individual pictures to be recognized.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RSVP; Recognition; Scene perception; Visual masking; Visual perception

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27048442     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1096-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  7 in total

Review 1.  Downgraded phenomenology: how conscious overflow lost its richness.

Authors:  Emily J Ward
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Making Sense of Real-World Scenes.

Authors:  George L Malcolm; Iris I A Groen; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Contrasting gist-based and template-based guidance during real-world visual search.

Authors:  Brett Bahle; Michi Matsukura; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  All-or-none face categorization in the human brain.

Authors:  Talia L Retter; Fang Jiang; Michael A Webster; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Ultra-Rapid serial visual presentation reveals dynamics of feedforward and feedback processes in the ventral visual pathway.

Authors:  Yalda Mohsenzadeh; Sheng Qin; Radoslaw M Cichy; Dimitrios Pantazis
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Imaging object-scene relations processing in visible and invisible natural scenes.

Authors:  Nathan Faivre; Julien Dubois; Naama Schwartz; Liad Mudrik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  High-Fidelity Visual Long-Term Memory within an Unattended Blink of an Eye.

Authors:  Christof Kuhbandner; Elizabeth A Rosas-Corona; Philipp Spachtholz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.