Literature DB >> 28770416

A stepwise under-prepared osteotomy technique improves primary stability in shallow-placed implants: a preliminary study for simultaneous vertical ridge augmentation.

Daisuke Ueno1, Kei Nakamura2, Kousuke Kojima2, Takeshi Toyoshima3, Hideaki Tanaka4, Kazuhiko Ueda5, Kiyoshi Koyano6, Toshiro Kodama2.   

Abstract

Simultaneous vertical ridge augmentation (VRA) can reduce treatment procedures and surgery time, but the concomitant reduction in primary stability (PS) of a shallow-placed implant imparts risk to its prognosis. Although several studies have reported improvements in PS, there is little information from any simultaneous VRA model. This study aimed to evaluate whether tapered implants with stepwise under-prepared osteotomy could improve the PS of shallow-placed implants in an in vitro model of simultaneous VRA. Tapered implants (Straumann® Bone Level Tapered implant; BLT) and hybrid implants (Straumann® Bone Level implant; BL) were investigated in this study. A total of 80 osteotomies of different depths (4, 6, 8, 10 mm) were created in rigid polyurethane foam blocks, and each BLT and BL was inserted by either standard (BLT-S, BL-S) or a stepwise under-prepared (BLT-U, BL-U) osteotomy protocol. The PS was evaluated by measuring maximum insertion torque (IT), implant stability quotient (ISQ), and removal torque (RT). The significance level was set at P < 0.05. There were no significant differences in IT, ISQ or RT when comparing BLT-S and BL-S or BLT-U and BL-U at placement depths of 6 and 8 mm. When comparison was made between osteotomy protocols, IT was significantly greater in BLT-U than in BLT-S at all placement depths. A stepwise under-prepared osteotomy protocol improves initial stability of a tapered implant even in a shallow-placed implant model. BLT-U could be a useful protocol for simultaneous VRA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental; Implants; Initial stability; Vertical bone augmentation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28770416     DOI: 10.1007/s10266-017-0316-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Odontology        ISSN: 1618-1247            Impact factor:   2.634


  19 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative radiologic planning of implant surgery in compromised patients.

Authors:  Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 7.589

2.  Influence of implant taper on the primary and secondary stability of osseointegrated titanium implants.

Authors:  Dominic O'Sullivan; Lars Sennerby; Neil Meredith
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Role of clinician's experience and implant design on implant stability. An ex vivo study in artificial soft bones.

Authors:  Georgios E Romanos; Abdulaziz Basha-Hijazi; Bhumija Gupta; Yan-Fang Ren; Hans Malmstrom
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.932

4.  Brånemark implants and osteoporosis: a clinical exploratory study.

Authors:  B Friberg; A Ekestubbe; D Mellström; L Sennerby
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.932

5.  Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study.

Authors:  Afsheen Tabassum; Gert J Meijer; Johannes G C Wolke; John A Jansen
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.977

6.  Relationship between contact time measurements and PTV values when using the Periotest to measure implant stability.

Authors:  N Meredith; B Friberg; L Sennerby; C Aparicio
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.681

7.  Does Implant Design Affect Implant Primary Stability? A Resonance Frequency Analysis-Based Randomized Split-Mouth Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sergio Alexandre Gehrke; Ulisses Tavares da Silva; Massimo Del Fabbro
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  Clinical outcome of Brånemark System implants of various diameters: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Bertil Friberg; Annika Ekestubbe; Lars Sennerby
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Primary stability of a hybrid self-tapping implant compared to a cylindrical non-self-tapping implant with respect to drilling protocols in an ex vivo model.

Authors:  Takeshi Toyoshima; Wilfried Wagner; Marcus Oliver Klein; Elmar Stender; Marco Wieland; Bilal Al-Nawas
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.932

10.  Effect of implant design on primary stability using torque-time curves in artificial bone.

Authors:  Yoko Yamaguchi; Makoto Shiota; Motohiro Munakata; Shohei Kasugai; Masahiko Ozeki
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2015-08-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability.

Authors:  Tanja Grobecker-Karl; Anthony Dickinson; Siegfried Heckmann; Matthias Karl; Constanze Steiner
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 4.241

2.  Evaluation of Primary Stability of Cylindrical and Tapered Implants in Different Bone Types by Measuring Implant Displacement: An In vitro Study.

Authors:  Tsutomu Sugiura; Kazuhiko Yamamoto; Satoshi Horita; Kazuhiro Murakami; Tadaaki Kirita
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.