Literature DB >> 28750099

Identification of RNA biomarkers for chemical safety screening in mouse embryonic stem cells using RNA deep sequencing analysis.

Hidenori Tani1, Jun-Ichi Takeshita2, Hiroshi Aoki1, Kaoru Nakamura1, Ryosuke Abe3, Akinobu Toyoda3, Yasunori Endo4, Sadaaki Miyamoto4, Masashi Gamo2, Hiroaki Sato5, Masaki Torimura1.   

Abstract

Although it is not yet possible to replace in vivo animal testing completely, the need for a more efficient method for toxicity testing, such as an in vitro cell-based assay, has been widely acknowledged. Previous studies have focused on mRNAs as biomarkers; however, recent studies have revealed that non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are also efficient novel biomarkers for toxicity testing. Here, we used deep sequencing analysis (RNA-seq) to identify novel RNA biomarkers, including ncRNAs, that exhibited a substantial response to general chemical toxicity from nine chemicals, and to benzene toxicity specifically. The nine chemicals are listed in the Japan Pollutant Release and Transfer Register as class I designated chemical substances. We used undifferentiated mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) as a simplified cell-based toxicity assay. RNA-seq revealed that many mRNAs and ncRNAs responded substantially to the chemical compounds in mESCs. This finding indicates that ncRNAs can be used as novel RNA biomarkers for chemical safety screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28750099      PMCID: PMC5531504          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

The 7th Amendment to the Cosmetics Directive banned animal testing of cosmetic ingredients for human use in 2013 [1]. Although it is not yet possible to replace in vivo animal testing completely, the need for a more efficient method for toxicity testing has been widely acknowledged [2]. Among the alternative methods to animal testing, the use of in vitro cell-based assays appears to be one of the most appropriate approaches to predict the toxic properties of single chemicals, particulate matter, complex mixtures and environmental pollutants [3-9]. Over the past decade, global gene expression profiling has been used increasingly to investigate cellular toxicity in transformed and primary cells [6]. Almost all previous studies used transformed cells such as Jurkat [10], A549 [5], or HepG2 cells [7,8], or primary cells such as human pulmonary artery endothelial cells [11], human bronchial epithelial cells [12], or human aortic endothelial cells [13]. These previous studies only focused on mRNAs as biomarkers. However, recent studies identified non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) as efficient novel biomarkers for toxicity testing [14-16]. ncRNAs can be roughly classified into three groups: small ncRNAs (20‒30 nucleotides [nt]) such as microRNAs (miRNAs), intermediate-sized ncRNAs (30‒200 nt) such as small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), and long ncRNAs (lncRNAs; >200 nt) such as long intergenic non-coding RNAs (lincRNAs). LncRNAs are defined as RNA molecules greater than 200 nucleotides in length that do not contain any apparent protein-coding potential [17-20]. The majority of lncRNAs are transcribed by RNA polymerase II (Pol II), as evidenced by Pol II occupancy, 5′ caps, histone modifications associated with Pol II transcriptional elongation, and polyadenylation. Moreover, the previous studies used transformed or primary cells. Transformed cells are genetically altered, typically aneuploid, and may exhibit clinically irrelevant toxic responses to compounds. Primary cells from animal tissues lose their in vivo phenotypes, can exhibit high variability among isolations, and can often only be expanded by dedifferentiation [21]. The present study used deep sequencing analysis (RNA-seq) to identify novel RNA biomarkers including ncRNAs that exhibited substantial responses to general chemical toxicity from nine chemicals, and to benzene toxicity specifically. The nine chemicals are listed in the Japan Pollutant Release and Transfer Register as class I designated chemical substances. Moreover, we used mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) because mESCs have three important attributes [9,22]: (i) normality: they are regarded as native cells; (ii) pluripotency, the ability to differentiate into specialized cells; and (iii) self-renewal, the ability to undergo numerous cycles of cell division while remaining undifferentiated in culture. These characteristics make mESCs a promising choice for assessment of toxicity, and overcome the limitations of transformed or primary cells.

Materials and methods

Chemicals

Benzene, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, chloroform, p-cresol, p-dichlorobenzene, phenol, pyrocatechol, tri-n-butyl phosphate, and trichloroethylene were obtained from Wako, Japan. These chemicals were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Wako) and diluted in culture medium at 0.1% vol/vol final concentration.

Cell culture

The H-1 mESC line was originally isolated from C3H/He mice [23]. mESCs were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (4.5 g/l glucose) with L-glutamine, without sodium pyruvate, (Nacalai Tesque, Japan) supplemented with 15% foetal bovine serum (Gibco, USA), 1000 U/ml Stem Sure Leukemia Inhibitory Factor (mouse recombinant solution; Wako), 0.1 mM Stem Sure 2-mercaptoethanol solution (Wako), and penicillinstreptomycin (Gibco). Cells were grown on mitomycin C (Kyowa Kirin, Japan)-treated mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder cells (C57BL/6J) at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. For chemical stress treatments, mESCs were cultured in ESGRO Complete Plus serum-free clonal grade medium (Merck Millipore, Germany) on gelatine (Sigma, USA)-coated dishes without feeder cells.

Chemical stress treatments

Cells were seeded at 3.8 × 105 cells per well of a 6-well plate in 2 ml medium. The cells were incubated overnight at 37°C with 5% CO2. In separate analyses, cells were treated with benzene (final concentration 1000 μM) and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (100 μM), chloroform (1000 μM), p-cresol (10 μM), p-dichlorobenzene (100 μM), phenol (100 μM), pyrocatechol (10 μM), tri-n-butyl phosphate (10 μM), or trichloroethylene (1000 μM) for 24 h. Total RNA was extracted from cells in the 6-well plates with RNAiso Plus (Takara, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

RNA-seq and data analysis

RNA-seq analyses were performed by Takara. Ribosomal RNA was removed using a Ribo-Zero Magnetic Gold kit (Human/Mouse/Rat; Illumina, USA). An RNA-seq library was constructed using a TruSeq Standard mRNA Sample Prep kit (Illumina). One hundred base paired-end read RNA-seq tags were generated using an Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencer according to the standard protocol. The fluorescence images were processed to sequences using the analysis pipeline supplied by Illumina. RNA-seq tags were mapped to the mouse genome (hg19) from the National Center for Biotechnology Information using TopHat mapping software. More than 40 million RNA-seq tags from each sample were analysed. Genic representations using fragments per kilobase of exon per million mapped fragments (FPKM) to normalize for gene length and depth of sequencing were calculated. Sequencing tags were then mapped to the mouse reference genome sequence using mapping software, allowing no mismatches. RNA-seq tags were assigned to corresponding RefSeq transcripts when their genomic coordinates overlapped. We used RNA sequences available from public databases: mRNA from NM of RefSeq and lncRNA candidates from NR of RefSeq [24]. In total, 32,586 RNAs from the NM and NR categories of the RefSeq Database were used for RNA annotation. The following expression ratio r (x, y) was used in this study. where x and y were the FPKMs of the control and treatment groups, respectively. Note that if x and y were zero, then the smallest values (excluding zero) in the control and the treatment groups were used instead of x and y, respectively.

Real-time quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted from cells with RNAiso Plus (TaKaRa) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The isolated RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using PrimeScript RT Master Mix (Perfect Real Time; TaKaRa). The resulting cDNA was amplified using the following primer sets: Gapdh (forward: 5’-CCGGGAAACTGTGGCGTGATGG-3’, reverse: 5’-AGGTGGAGGAGTGGGTGTCGCTGTT-3’); NM_001177607 (forward: 5’-GCTGTGGAGTTGCTGCCTA-3’, reverse: 5’-AGGAGAGGAGAGGAGCATCA-3’), NM_178734 (forward: 5’-GGAAAGCCTTTGCTCAGAGA-3’, reverse: 5’-CATAGGGCTTCTCCCCAGT-3’); NR_027375 (forward: 5’-TGATTTGACTTTGCTTCATAGGG-3’, reverse: 5’-TGAATCGAACCATTTTGTACTGA-3’); NM_001166648 (forward: 5’-ACTCTGTTCAAGAAAAAGGGTTGT-3’, reverse: 5’-TCCATGAAAAGTTCAGCCATT-3’); NM_001163553 (forward: 5’-AAAGCTGCTCCTTGTGTCTCA-3’, reverse: 5’-AAGGCCAAAGACCTAGCACA-3’); NM_145978 (forward: 5’-GCTGCTCACCACTTGACCTA-3’, reverse: 5’-ATGGAGCAGCACCCTCACT-3’). Gapdh was used for normalization. THUNDERBIRD SYBR qPCR mix (Toyobo, Japan) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RT-qPCR analysis was performed using a MyiQ2 (BIO-RAD, USA).

Data access

Short-read sequence archive data in this study are registered in GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank)/DDBJ (http://ddbj.sakura.ne.jp). The data used to determine the expression levels of transcripts are registered as accession numbers DRX076650‒DRX076669.

Results

General up- and downregulation of mRNAs and ncRNAs after chemical exposure

mESCs were exposed to nine chemicals [benzene, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, chloroform, p-cresol, p-dichlorobenzene, phenol, pyrocatechol, tri-n-butyl phosphate, and trichloroethylene] (Fig 1) for 24 hours in duplicate. In preliminary experiments, we optimized the concentrations of chemicals as described previously [16]. We identified the 30 RNAs whose expression was most upregulated following the exposure of mESCs to the nine chemicals in general (Table 1). We found that mRNA levels for these genes increased by approximately 100- to 30,000-fold after exposure to the chemicals. To confirm the reproducibility of the RNA-seq data, we determined the RNA expression levels by RT-qPCR in duplicate for Top 3 for upregulation of mRNAs and ncRNAs after benzene exposures. The results showed that the relative quantitative values (exposure/control) of NM_001177607, NM_178734, and NR_027375 were 746.6 ± 96.1, 570.3 ± 150.6, and 606.4 ± 52.4 (mean ± errors), respectively. The data of RT-qPCR were similar to those of RNA-seq. Thus, we confirmed the reproducibility of the RNA-seq data. We then categorized the upregulated mRNAs according to their Gene Ontology (GO) terms (Table 2). Of the various GO terms, genes for regulation of cellular responses, such as cellular response to mechanical stimulus, cellular response to reactive oxygen species, and negative regulation of inflammatory response, occurred particularly frequently among the upregulated genes. Moreover, two ncRNAs, NR_027375 (Ythdf3_v3) and NR_033430 (Gm2694) were identified as being upregulated by general chemical exposure. The lengths of Ythdf3_v3 and Gm2694 are 5,308 nt and 682 nt, respectively. The functions of these ncRNAs are unknown; therefore, we cannot perform the correspondence analysis between ncRNA and the expression of mRNA.
Fig 1

Chemical structures used in the present study.

Table 1

Genes upregulated in mouse embryonic stem cells on general exposure to nine chemicals (Top 30).

RefseqExposure/Control
benzenebis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalatechloroformp-cresolp-dichlorobenzenephenolpyrocatecholtri-n-butyl phosphatetrichloroethylene
NM_00117760726671063730344930147283121402446768851
NM_1787346834361634995184639129721031050053287
NR_027375483023956836622848828832426459707685
NM_172778181540583750419143933768365538022614
NM_177574495017473613414934661835392447182599
NM_013512387421512892532319223904737627131403
NM_001285498252765169953341650012618595229118049
NM_13387913159658323747180886402537061603259
NM_001276493592739766333138011997397600115896744
NM_1453826295254353716476355814154193946699346
NM_14538237753095273536532784168143949154993
NM_001253736453864043700456249944928468027563753
NM_0259461372302694615042090142216447941804
NM_17804535422905107719923147558942335381644
NM_15350186113974525104245273024646720693225
NM_00116474512322824411169353851117812894144371069810323
NM_2072322011726300810866951594252632921305
NM_0256747989090484131488782974563330613590
NM_001024922342223443642435718513617150348061948
NM_00108253617492416338947445343912369657622549
NR_03343052621814952160014911347168020091375
NM_198620388646633861596739623577240968658069
NM_0011936602783563440217849135924257300324178249
NM_14614215001293328011774742813223211341014
NM_001136079117620352585215132142266295513203541
NM_145483506756801402755393740897594
NM_001113181228428043197138534391324102426932534
NM_0012894712082181910328771083149792611781923
NM_001048179263847032916056151686388321091169
NM_02706227581797313924828582932201417361363
Table 2

GO terms for genes upregulated in mouse embryonic stem cells on general exposure to nine chemicals (Top 30).

RefSeqGO termDefinition
NM_0011776070003677DNA binding
NM_1787340006355regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
NR_027375--
NM_1727780016491oxidoreductase activity
NM_1775740015031protein transport
NM_0135120008092cytoskeletal protein binding
NM_0012854980071300cellular response to retinoic acid
NM_1338790006355regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
NM_0012764930071260cellular response to mechanical stimulus
NM_1453820005737cytoplasm
NM_1451510003677regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
NM_0012537360008270zinc ion binding
NM_0259460034614cellular response to reactive oxygen species
NM_1780450007049cell cycle
NM_1535010019217regulation of fatty acid metabolic process
NM_0011647450016791phosphatase activity
NM_2072320016311dephosphorylation
NM_0256740010468regulation of gene expression
NM_0010249220010501RNA secondary structure unwinding
NM_0010825360045893positive regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
NR_033430--
NM_1986200005575cellular_component
NM_0011936600005198structural molecule activity
NM_1461420030154cell differentiation
NM_0011360790050728negative regulation of inflammatory response
NM_1454830006355regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
NM_0011131810006811ion transport
NM_0012894710006355regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
NM_0010481790071677positive regulation of mononuclear cell migration
NM_0270620002376immune system process
Next, we identified the 30 RNAs whose expression was most downregulated following the exposure of mESCs to the nine chemicals in general (Table 3). We found that the mRNA levels for these genes decreased to approximately 0.0001- to 0.006 times their original levels after exposure to the chemicals. To confirm the reproducibility of the RNA-seq data, we determined the RNA expression levels by RT-qPCR in duplicate for Top 3 for downregulation of mRNAs after benzene exposures. The results showed that the relative quantitative values (exposure/control) of NM_001166648, NM_001163553, and NM_145978 were 0.0006 ± 0.0001, 0.0003 ± 0.0002, and 0.0007 ± 0.0002 (mean ± errors), respectively. The data of RT-qPCR were similar to those of RNA-seq. Thus, we confirmed the reproducibility of the RNA-seq data. We then categorized the downregulated mRNAs according to their GO terms (Table 4). Of the various GO terms, genes for regulation of cellular processes, such as regulation of transcription, negative regulation of apoptosis, and regulation of cellular metabolism, occurred particularly frequently among the downregulated genes. Moreover, five ncRNAs, NR_040383 (4930520O04Rik), NR_033540 (F630042J09Rik), NR_121603 (Atp11a_v4), NR_102360 (Zbtb24_v4), and NR_105027 (1700124L16Rik) were identified as being downregulated by chemical exposure. The lengths of 4930520O04Rik, F630042J09Rik, Atp11a_v4, Zbtb24_v4, and 1700124L16Rik are 1,217 nt, 3,154 nt, 7,648 nt, 2,872 nt, and 346 nt, respectively. The functions of these ncRNAs are unknown; therefore, we cannot perform the correspondence analysis between ncRNA and the expression of mRNA.
Table 3

Genes downregulated in mouse embryonic stem cells on general exposure to nine chemicals (Top 30).

RefseqExposure/Control
benzenebis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalatechloroformp-cresolp-dichlorobenzenephenolpyrocatecholtri-n-butyl phosphatetrichloroethylene
NM_0011666480.000700.000170.000220.000170.000170.000170.000170.000220.00017
NM_0011635530.000210.000210.000210.000420.000180.000210.000210.000240.00021
NM_1459780.000260.000350.000260.000260.000260.000330.000250.000260.00025
NR_0403830.000480.000480.000650.000480.000480.000480.000480.000480.00048
NM_0012854310.000240.000240.000150.000240.000390.000240.000240.000240.00015
NM_1462280.000510.000510.000510.000510.000510.000510.000510.000610.00483
NM_0011644200.000790.000790.000790.000790.000790.000790.000790.000790.00074
NM_0012910090.000790.000790.000790.000790.000790.000490.000790.000790.00079
NM_0011633360.000500.000490.000500.000690.000500.039190.000490.000500.00049
NR_0335400.000700.000700.005100.000700.000710.000700.000700.000680.00109
NM_1780610.000380.000380.002130.000090.002840.001650.001170.002180.00082
NM_1462480.000140.000160.000140.000160.001660.000160.002250.000810.00014
NM_0213020.000890.000750.000750.000750.000750.000750.000630.000750.00075
NM_0010813620.000660.000240.000660.000400.000400.000400.000400.000240.00039
NM_0011459680.000630.000690.000690.000690.000830.000690.000690.000690.00075
NR_1216030.000920.000910.000920.001210.000920.000920.000920.001210.00091
NM_0301780.000390.000380.001290.000250.000390.000390.000590.000250.00025
NR_1023600.000220.000380.000220.000220.000380.000380.000210.000120.00012
NM_0012858750.000900.000990.000910.001230.000910.000910.000820.000910.00090
NM_1455980.000630.000630.000890.000630.000890.000630.000630.000450.00063
NM_0213740.001510.001500.001510.001510.001860.001510.001500.001510.00150
NM_2072010.000790.000790.000970.000790.000790.000960.000790.018200.00079
NM_1759380.000700.000830.000700.000650.000700.000750.000920.000750.00069
NM_0011629210.000680.000680.000680.001370.000680.000680.001370.000920.03173
NM_0188120.000790.000100.004810.000100.000130.000180.000130.006200.00010
NM_1461880.000310.000210.000260.000310.000260.000260.000210.000310.00026
NR_1050270.000360.000360.000510.000360.000510.000510.000510.000720.00051
NM_0012423780.002620.002610.002630.002620.002630.002630.002610.002630.00261
NM_0012715420.000350.000470.000480.000320.000480.000710.000470.000710.00047
NM_0094000.000550.000540.000990.000540.000550.000300.000300.000550.00099
Table 4

GO terms for genes upregulated in mouse embryonic stem cells exposed to benzene (Top 30).

RefSeqGO termDefinition
NM_0011666480006355regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
NM_0011635530006886intracellular protein transport
NM_1459780046872metal ion binding
NR_040383--
NM_0012854310006355regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
NM_1462280005096GTPase activator activity
NM_0011644200005575cellular_component
NM_0012910090043433negative regulation of sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activity
NM_0011633360070588calcium ion transmembrane transport
NR_033540--
NM_1780610046872metal ion binding
NM_1462480030154cell differentiation
NM_0213020016310phosphorylation
NM_0010813620006355regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
NM_0011459680005575cellular_component
NR_121603--
NM_0301780045893positive regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
NR_102360--
NM_0012858750043066negative regulation of apoptotic process
NM_1455980045494photoreceptor cell maintenance
NM_0213740009968negative regulation of signal transduction
NM_2072010007186G-protein coupled receptor signaling pathway
NM_1759380031324negative regulation of cellular metabolic process
NM_0011629210004519endonuclease activity
NM_0188120006355regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
NM_1461880007275multicellular organism development
NR_105027--
NM_0012423780030641regulation of cellular pH
NM_0012715420010629negative regulation of gene expression
NM_0094000043066negative regulation of apoptotic process

Specific up- and downregulation of mRNAs and ncRNAs after exposure to benzene

We next explored toxic response to specific chemical exposure, using benzene as a representative chemical substance. We identified the 30 RNAs whose expression was most upregulated following the exposure of mESCs to benzene (Table 5). We found that mRNA levels for these genes increased by approximately 3000- to 13,000-fold after exposure to benzene. We then categorized the upregulated mRNAs according to their GO terms (Table 5). Of the various GO terms, genes involved in cellular responses, such as cellular response to mechanical stimulus, inflammatory response, and cellular response to DNA damage, occurred particularly frequently among the upregulated genes. Moreover, two ncRNAs, NR_038062 (Yipf2_v4) and NR_027375 (Ythdf3_v3) were identified as being upregulated by exposure to benzene. The lengths of Yipf2_v4 and Ythdf3_v3 are 1,919 nt and 5,306 nt, respectively. The functions of these ncRNAs are unknown; therefore, we cannot perform the correspondence analysis between ncRNA and the expression of mRNA.
Table 5

Genes upregulated in mouse embryonic stem cells exposed to benzene (Top 30).

RefSeqExposure/ControlGO termDefinition
NM_001193619138380043066negative regulation of apoptotic process
NM_001164745123220016791phosphatase activity
NR_03806210355--
NM_00100418590650007050cell cycle arrest
NM_13399290120006397mRNA processing
NM_00110261178840032259methylation
NM_02913269940042802identical protein binding
NM_17873468340006355regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
NM_00117771064650030100regulation of endocytosis
NM_14538262950005737cytoplasm
NM_00128701559770000398mRNA splicing, via spliceosome
NM_00127649359270071260cellular response to mechanical stimulus
NM_00116641358310035023regulation of Rho protein signal transduction
NM_13416154120016740ransferase activity
NM_00104800852500005515protein binding
NM_02808150650006355regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
NM_00116370250210004842ubiquitin-protein transferase activity
NM_17757449500015031protein transport
NR_0273754830--
NM_02961247820005575cellular_component
NM_00125387047650070062extracellular exosome
NM_00125373645380070062extracellular exosome
NM_00116473543560006954inflammatory response
NM_00115971442300008380RNA splicing
NM_00130164140940006915apoptotic process
NM_00114595740340003674molecular_function
NM_19862038860008150biological_process
NM_01351238740005856cytoskeleton
NM_14515137750006355regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
NM_00968537660006355cellular response to DNA damage stimulus
Next, we identified the 30 RNAs whose expression was most downregulated following the exposure of mESCs to benzene (Table 6). We found that mRNA levels for these genes decreased to approximately 0.000002 to 0.0002 times their original levels after exposure to benzene. We then categorized the downregulated mRNAs according to their GO terms (Table 6). Of the various GO terms, genes involved in regulation of cellular processes, such as multicellular organism development, cell cycle, and DNA replication, occurred particularly frequently among the downregulated genes. Moreover, two ncRNAs, NR_034050 (Snora44) and NR_102360 (Zbtb24_v4) were identified as being downregulated by exposure to benzene. The lengths of Snora44 and Zbtb24_v4 are 117 nt and 2,872 nt, respectively. Snora44 is a snoRNA. The functions of these ncRNAs are unknown; therefore, we cannot perform the correspondence analysis between ncRNA and the expression of mRNA. Other chemical compound exposure data are shown in S1–S16 Tables.
Table 6

Genes downregulated in mouse embryonic stem cells exposed to benzene (Top 30).

RefSeqExposure/ControlGO termDefinition
NR_0340500.0000023--
NM_0264890.00005820051321meiotic cell cycle
NM_0111580.00011130045859regulation of protein kinase activity
NM_0010801180.00011370071383cellular response to steroid hormone stimulus
NM_0010335280.00011960006511ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process
NM_0011595710.00012660007155cell adhesion
NM_0012898390.00013070006355regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
NM_0011685160.00013380016740transferase activity
NM_0010813730.00013380007049cell cycle
NM_1462480.00013580007275multicellular organism development
NM_1537960.00013620006260DNA replication
NM_0075540.00013790030509BMP signaling pathway
NM_1722520.00014060003723RNA binding
NM_1814240.00014690044065regulation of respiratory system process
NM_0011594980.00014980050687negative regulation of defense response to virus
NM_0012897260.00015140007275multicellular organism development
NM_0012565220.00016430008284positive regulation of cell proliferation
NM_1814230.00016822000827mitochondrial RNA surveillance
NM_1773520.00017320006071glycerol metabolic process
NM_0138460.00017380007275multicellular organism development
NM_0287050.00019080005829cytosol
NM_0010773640.0001928regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
NM_1724090.00019680016043cellular component organization
NM_0011641850.00020270019216regulation of lipid metabolic process
NM_0011635530.00020830006886intracellular protein transport
NM_0263030.00021090008152metabolic process
NM_0298110.00021360070374positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascade
NR_1023600.0002153--
NM_0095380.00022000010468regulation of gene expression

Discussion

In this study, we used RNA-seq to identify novel RNA biomarkers that exhibited a substantial response to general chemical toxicity from nine chemicals, and to benzene toxicity specifically. Some ncRNAs exhibited substantial responses to the chemical compounds, although fewer ncRNAs than mRNAs responded in this way. We considered that both mRNAs and ncRNAs expression levels might be independently changed by chemical stresses. We identified two ncRNAs (Ythdf3_v3 and Gm2694) that were upregulated and five ncRNAs (4930520O04Rik, F630042J09Rik, Atp11a_v4, Zbtb24_v4 and 1700124L16Rik) that were downregulated in response to general chemical exposure. These results indicate that ncRNAs as well as mRNAs have the potential to be surrogate indicators of chemical safety screening. We also identified two ncRNAs (Yipf2_v4 and Ythdf3_v3) that were upregulated and two ncRNAs (Snora44 and Zbtb24_v4) that were downregulated in benzene-treated cells. These findings indicate that ncRNAs can be used as novel RNA biomarkers for chemical safety screening. Traditional RNA biomarkers of various types of cell stress have been identified, for example markers of oxidative stress response (Nfkb1, Jun, and Hif1a), DNA damage (Ppp1r15a, Gadd45a, Ddit3, and Cdkn1a), heat shock response (Hsp90aa1 and Hsf1), and endoplasmic reticulum stress (Atf3 and Bbc3), and hypoxia inducible factors (Arnt and Mtf1) [25]. However, the expression levels of these RNA biomarkers did not appear among the 30 genes that were the most up- or downregulated by chemical exposure in this study. Therefore, we identified novel RNA biomarkers that were more efficient markers of chemical toxicity than traditional RNA biomarkers. As expected, we observed upregulation of genes involved in regulation of cellular responses when cells were treated with the nine chemicals in general. This result suggests that the cells responded to the stress by increasing expression of genes involved in cellular responses. A similar phenomenon was observed in cells treated with benzene. Furthermore, we observed downregulation of genes involved in regulation of cellular processes when cells were treated with the nine chemicals in general. This suggests that cells downregulated basic processes such as proliferation in response to the cellular stress by decreasing expression of genes involved in these cellular processes. Profiles for small RNAs such as miRNAs have been reported for several animal species including humans, mice, and rats [26-30]. miRNAs play pivotal roles in regulation of gene expression, and have the potential to be useful biomarkers. However, small RNAs and long RNAs cannot be analysed at the same time using RNA-seq because they require different RNA-seq application systems. lncRNAs have great potential to be useful biomarkers; for example, lncRNAs participate in diverse cellular functions including chromatin modification, transcription, splicing, mRNA decay, translation, and protein transport and assembly, and their RNA elements and RNA-protein complex machineries are also thought to be extremely diverse. We therefore focused on lncRNAs in the present study. Moreover, mESCs can differentiate into a variety of cell types [31], and thus allow assessment of chemical exposure risk in a variety of tissues and cell types. However, in the present study we used undifferentiated mESCs because we aimed to provide a basic framework for using mESCs for chemical safety screening. We propose that many mRNAs and ncRNAs represent novel RNA biomarkers for chemical safety screening using mESCs. This study provides only a basic framework for such an application, and we plan to assess differentiated cells derived from mESCs, such as neurons, cardiomyocytes, and hepatocytes. We believe that these potential RNA biomarkers will be used for chemical safety screening in the future. For example, they could be quantified by a custom-made microchip or array [32].

Specific up-regulated genes in mouse embryonic stem cells exposed to bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (Top 30).

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Specific up-regulated genes in mouse embryonic stem cells exposed to chloroform (Top 30).

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Specific up-regulated genes in mouse embryonic stem cells exposed to p-cresol (Top 30).

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Specific up-regulated genes in mouse embryonic stem cells exposed to p-dichlorobenzene (Top 30).

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Specific up-regulated genes in mouse embryonic stem cells exposed to phenol (Top 30).

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Specific up-regulated genes in mouse embryonic stem cells exposed to pyrocatechol (Top 30).

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Specific up-regulated genes in mouse embryonic stem cells exposed to tri-n-butyl phosphate (Top 30).

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Specific up-regulated genes in mouse embryonic stem cells exposed to trichloroethylene (Top 30).

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Specific down-regulated genes in mouse embryonic stem cells exposed to bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (Top 30).

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Specific down-regulated genes in mouse embryonic stem cells exposed to chloroform (Top 30).

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Specific down-regulated genes in mouse embryonic stem cells exposed to p-cresol (Top 30).

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Specific down-regulated genes in mouse embryonic stem cells exposed to p-dichlorobenzene (Top 30).

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Specific down-regulated genes in mouse embryonic stem cells exposed to phenol (Top 30).

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Specific down-regulated genes in mouse embryonic stem cells exposed to pyrocatechol (Top 30).

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Specific down-regulated genes in mouse embryonic stem cells exposed to tri-n-butyl phosphate (Top 30).

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Specific down-regulated genes in mouse embryonic stem cells exposed to trichloroethylene (Top 30).

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.
  31 in total

Review 1.  Long noncoding RNAs: functional surprises from the RNA world.

Authors:  Jeremy E Wilusz; Hongjae Sunwoo; David L Spector
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Molecular biomarkers to assess health risks due to environmental contaminants exposure.

Authors:  Irais Poblete-Naredo; Arnulfo Albores
Journal:  Biomedica       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 0.935

3.  Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Based Developmental Toxicity Assays for Chemical Safety Screening and Systems Biology Data Generation.

Authors:  Vaibhav Shinde; Stefanie Klima; Perumal Srinivasan Sureshkumar; Kesavan Meganathan; Smita Jagtap; Eugen Rempel; Jörg Rahnenführer; Jan Georg Hengstler; Tanja Waldmann; Jürgen Hescheler; Marcel Leist; Agapios Sachinidis
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 4.  Myeloid differentiation (MyD)/growth arrest DNA damage (GADD) genes in tumor suppression, immunity and inflammation.

Authors:  D A Liebermann; B Hoffman
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 5.  Long non-coding RNAs: modulators of nuclear structure and function.

Authors:  Jan H Bergmann; David L Spector
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 8.382

6.  Toxicity assessment of chlorinated wastewater effluents by using transcriptome-based bioassays and Fourier transform mass spectrometry (FT-MS) analysis.

Authors:  Toshikazu Fukushima; Hiroe Hara-Yamamura; Makoto Urai; Ikuro Kasuga; Futoshi Kurisu; Taro Miyoshi; Katsuki Kimura; Yoshimasa Watanabe; Satoshi Okabe
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 11.236

7.  Assessment of technical protocols for novel embryonic stem cell tests with molecular markers (Hand1- and Cmya1-ESTs): a preliminary cross-laboratory performance analysis.

Authors:  Noriyuki Suzuki; Norihisa Yamashita; Naoteru Koseki; Toru Yamada; Yutaka Kimura; Setsuya Aiba; Tomoyasu Toyoizumi; Mika Watanabe; Ryo Ohta; Noriho Tanaka; Koichi Saito
Journal:  J Toxicol Sci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.196

8.  cDNA microarray analysis of rat alveolar epithelial cells following exposure to organic extract of diesel exhaust particles.

Authors:  Eiko Koike; Seishiro Hirano; Akiko Furuyama; Takahiro Kobayashi
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 4.219

9.  A mammalian microRNA expression atlas based on small RNA library sequencing.

Authors:  Pablo Landgraf; Mirabela Rusu; Robert Sheridan; Alain Sewer; Nicola Iovino; Alexei Aravin; Sébastien Pfeffer; Amanda Rice; Alice O Kamphorst; Markus Landthaler; Carolina Lin; Nicholas D Socci; Leandro Hermida; Valerio Fulci; Sabina Chiaretti; Robin Foà; Julia Schliwka; Uta Fuchs; Astrid Novosel; Roman-Ulrich Müller; Bernhard Schermer; Ute Bissels; Jason Inman; Quang Phan; Minchen Chien; David B Weir; Ruchi Choksi; Gabriella De Vita; Daniela Frezzetti; Hans-Ingo Trompeter; Veit Hornung; Grace Teng; Gunther Hartmann; Miklos Palkovits; Roberto Di Lauro; Peter Wernet; Giuseppe Macino; Charles E Rogler; James W Nagle; Jingyue Ju; F Nina Papavasiliou; Thomas Benzing; Peter Lichter; Wayne Tam; Michael J Brownstein; Andreas Bosio; Arndt Borkhardt; James J Russo; Chris Sander; Mihaela Zavolan; Thomas Tuschl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Identification and target prediction of miRNAs specifically expressed in rat neural tissue.

Authors:  You-Jia Hua; Zhong-Yi Tang; Kang Tu; Li Zhu; Yi-Xue Li; Lu Xie; Hua-Sheng Xiao
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  Next generation sequencing data for use in risk assessment.

Authors:  B Alex Merrick
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2019-03-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.