Literature DB >> 21240730

Comparison of gene expression profiles induced by coarse, fine, and ultrafine particulate matter.

Yuh-Chin T Huang1, Edward D Karoly, Lisa A Dailey, Michael T Schmitt, Robert Silbajoris, Donald W Graff, Robert B Devlin.   

Abstract

Coarse, fine, and ultrafine particulate matter (PM) fractions possess different physical properties and chemical compositions and may produce different adverse health effects. Studies were undertaken to determine whether or not gene expression patterns may be used to discriminate among the three size fractions. Airway epithelial cells obtained from 6 normal individuals were exposed to Chapel Hill coarse, fine or ultrafine PM (250 μg/ml) for 6 and 24 h (n=3 different individuals each). RNA was isolated and hybridized to Affymetrix cDNA microarrays. Significant genes were identified and mapped to canonical pathways. Expression of selected genes was confirmed by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The numbers of genes altered by coarse, fine, and ultrafine PM increased from 0, 6, and 17 at 6 h to 1281, 302, and 455 at 24 h, respectively. The NRF2-mediated oxidative stress response, cell cycle:G2/M DNA damage checkpoint regulation, and mitotic roles of polo-like kinase were the top three pathways altered by all three fractions. Fine and ultrafine PM displayed more similar gene expression patterns. One example was the increased expression of metallothionein isoforms, reflecting the higher zinc content associated with fine and ultrafine fractions. A set of 10 genes was identified that could discriminate fine and ultrafine PM from coarse PM. These results indicate that common properties shared by the three size fractions as well as size-specific factors, e.g., compositions, may determine the effects on gene expression. Genomic markers may be used to discriminate coarse from fine and ultrafine PM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21240730     DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2010.516238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A        ISSN: 0098-4108


  20 in total

1.  Pulmonary T cell activation in response to chronic particulate air pollution.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Deiuliis; Thomas Kampfrath; Jixin Zhong; Steve Oghumu; Andrei Maiseyeu; Lung Chi Chen; Qinghua Sun; Abhay R Satoskar; Sanjay Rajagopalan
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 5.464

2.  Nrf2-related gene expression and exposure to traffic-related air pollution in elderly subjects with cardiovascular disease: An exploratory panel study.

Authors:  Sharine Wittkopp; Norbert Staimer; Thomas Tjoa; Timothy Stinchcombe; Nancy Daher; James J Schauer; Martin M Shafer; Constantinos Sioutas; Daniel L Gillen; Ralph J Delfino
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  Indications for distinct pathogenic mechanisms of asbestos and silica through gene expression profiling of the response of lung epithelial cells.

Authors:  Timothy N Perkins; Paul M Peeters; Arti Shukla; Ingrid Arijs; Julie Dragon; Emiel F M Wouters; Niki L Reynaert; Brooke T Mossman
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Gene expression profiling and pathway analysis of human bronchial epithelial cells exposed to airborne particulate matter collected from Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Hong Sun; Magdy Shamy; Thomas Kluz; Alexandra B Muñoz; Mianhua Zhong; Freda Laulicht; Mansour A Alghamdi; Mamdouh I Khoder; Lung-Chi Chen; Max Costa
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 4.219

5.  Particulate matter from Saudi Arabia induces genes involved in inflammation, metabolic syndrome and atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Jason Brocato; Hong Sun; Magdy Shamy; Thomas Kluz; Mansour A Alghamdi; Mamdouh I Khoder; Lung-Chi Chen; Max Costa
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2014

6.  Differences in gene expression and cytokine production by crystalline vs. amorphous silica in human lung epithelial cells.

Authors:  Timothy N Perkins; Arti Shukla; Paul M Peeters; Jeremy L Steinbacher; Christopher C Landry; Sherrill A Lathrop; Chad Steele; Niki L Reynaert; Emiel F M Wouters; Brooke T Mossman
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 9.400

Review 7.  Activation of Proinflammatory Responses in Cells of the Airway Mucosa by Particulate Matter: Oxidant- and Non-Oxidant-Mediated Triggering Mechanisms.

Authors:  Johan Øvrevik; Magne Refsnes; Marit Låg; Jørn A Holme; Per E Schwarze
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2015-07-02

8.  The influence of Nrf2 on cardiac responses to environmental stressors.

Authors:  Reuben Howden; Eva Gougian; Marcus Lawrence; Samantha Cividanes; Wesley Gladwell; Laura Miller-DeGraff; Page H Myers; D Clay Rouse; Robert B Devlin; Hye-Youn Cho; Steven R Kleeberger
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 9.  Genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of cobalt-, nickel- and copper-based nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ruth Magaye; Jinshun Zhao; Linda Bowman; Min Ding
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  NanoMiner - integrative human transcriptomics data resource for nanoparticle research.

Authors:  Lingjia Kong; Soile Tuomela; Lauri Hahne; Helena Ahlfors; Olli Yli-Harja; Bengt Fadeel; Riitta Lahesmaa; Reija Autio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.