Literature DB >> 12524553

Conversion of embryonic stem cells into neuroectodermal precursors in adherent monoculture.

Qi-Long Ying1, Marios Stavridis, Dean Griffiths, Meng Li, Austin Smith.   

Abstract

Mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells are competent for production of all fetal and adult cell types. However, the utility of ES cells as a developmental model or as a source of defined cell populations for pharmaceutical screening or transplantation is compromised because their differentiation in vitro is poorly controlled. Specification of primary lineages is not understood and consequently differentiation protocols are empirical, yielding variable and heterogeneous outcomes. Here we report that neither multicellular aggregation nor coculture is necessary for ES cells to commit efficiently to a neural fate. In adherent monoculture, elimination of inductive signals for alternative fates is sufficient for ES cells to develop into neural precursors. This process is not a simple default pathway, however, but requires autocrine fibroblast growth factor (FGF). Using flow cytometry quantitation and recording of individual colonies, we establish that the bulk of ES cells undergo neural conversion. The neural precursors can be purified to homogeneity by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) or drug selection. This system provides a platform for defining the molecular machinery of neural commitment and optimizing the efficiency of neuronal and glial cell production from pluripotent mammalian stem cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12524553     DOI: 10.1038/nbt780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Biotechnol        ISSN: 1087-0156            Impact factor:   54.908


  549 in total

Review 1.  Embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  H J Rippon; A E Bishop
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.831

2.  Ca2+ activated K channels-new tools to induce cardiac commitment from pluripotent stem cells in mice and men.

Authors:  Martin Müller; Marianne Stockmann; Daniela Malan; Anne Wolheim; Michael Tischendorf; Leonhard Linta; Sarah-Fee Katz; Qiong Lin; Stephan Latz; Cornelia Brunner; Anna M Wobus; Martin Zenke; Maria Wartenberg; Tobias M Boeckers; Götz von Wichert; Bernd K Fleischmann; Stefan Liebau; Alexander Kleger
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 3.  Alternative models in developmental toxicology.

Authors:  Hyung-yul Lee; Amy L Inselman; Jyotshnabala Kanungo; Deborah K Hansen
Journal:  Syst Biol Reprod Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.061

4.  A homozygous mutant embryonic stem cell bank applicable for phenotype-driven genetic screening.

Authors:  Kyoji Horie; Chikara Kokubu; Junko Yoshida; Keiko Akagi; Ayako Isotani; Akiko Oshitani; Kosuke Yusa; Ryuji Ikeda; Yue Huang; Allan Bradley; Junji Takeda
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2011-10-23       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Multiple phenotypes in Huntington disease mouse neural stem cells.

Authors:  James J Ritch; Antonio Valencia; Jonathan Alexander; Ellen Sapp; Leah Gatune; Gavin R Sangrey; Saurabh Sinha; Cally M Scherber; Scott Zeitlin; Ghazaleh Sadri-Vakili; Daniel Irimia; Marian Difiglia; Kimberly B Kegel
Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 4.314

6.  Combined RNAi and localization for functionally dissecting long noncoding RNAs.

Authors:  Debojyoti Chakraborty; Dennis Kappei; Mirko Theis; Anja Nitzsche; Li Ding; Maciej Paszkowski-Rogacz; Vineeth Surendranath; Nicolas Berger; Herbert Schulz; Kathrin Saar; Norbert Hubner; Frank Buchholz
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Eomesodermin induces Mesp1 expression and cardiac differentiation from embryonic stem cells in the absence of Activin.

Authors:  Jelle van den Ameele; Luca Tiberi; Antoine Bondue; Catherine Paulissen; Adèle Herpoel; Michelina Iacovino; Michael Kyba; Cédric Blanpain; Pierre Vanderhaeghen
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.807

8.  Direct reprogramming of Sertoli cells into multipotent neural stem cells by defined factors.

Authors:  Chao Sheng; Qinyuan Zheng; Jianyu Wu; Zhen Xu; Libin Wang; Wei Li; Haijiang Zhang; Xiao-Yang Zhao; Lei Liu; Ziwei Wang; Changlong Guo; Hua-Jun Wu; Zhonghua Liu; Liu Wang; Shigang He; Xiu-Jie Wang; Zhiguo Chen; Qi Zhou
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 25.617

9.  Induction of alternative fate other than default neuronal fate of embryonic stem cells in a membrane-based two-chambered microbioreactor by cell-secreted BMP4.

Authors:  Mohammad Mahfuz Chowdhury; Hiroshi Kimura; Teruo Fujii; Yasuyuki Sakai
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 2.800

10.  SMAD7 directly converts human embryonic stem cells to telencephalic fate by a default mechanism.

Authors:  Mohammad Zeeshan Ozair; Scott Noggle; Aryeh Warmflash; Joanna Ela Krzyspiak; Ali H Brivanlou
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.