Literature DB >> 31058248

Next generation sequencing data for use in risk assessment.

B Alex Merrick1.   

Abstract

Next generation sequencing (NGS) represents several powerful platforms that have revolutionized RNA and DNA analysis. The parallel sequencing of millions of DNA molecules can provide mechanistic insights into toxicology and provide new avenues for biomarker discovery with growing relevance for risk assessment. The evolution of NGS technologies has improved over the last decade with increased sensitivity and accuracy to foster new biomarker assays from tissue, blood and other biofluids. NGS sequencing technologies can identify transcriptional changes and genomic targets with base pair precision in response to chemical exposure. Further, there are several exciting movements within the toxicology community that incorporate NGS platforms into new strategies for more rapid toxicological characterizations. These include the Tox21 in vitro high throughput transcriptomic screening program, development of organotypic spheroids, alternative animal models, mining archival tissues, liquid biopsy and epigenomics. This review will describe NGS-based technologies, demonstrate how they can be used as tools for target discovery in tissue and blood, and suggest how they might be applied for risk assessment.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31058248      PMCID: PMC6497160          DOI: 10.1016/j.cotox.2019.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol        ISSN: 2468-2020


  65 in total

Review 1.  Microarrays and toxicology: the advent of toxicogenomics.

Authors:  E F Nuwaysir; M Bittner; J Trent; J C Barrett; C A Afshari
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.784

2.  Reliable identification of genomic variants from RNA-seq data.

Authors:  Robert Piskol; Gokul Ramaswami; Jin Billy Li
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  Utilizing toxicogenomic data to understand chemical mechanism of action in risk assessment.

Authors:  Vickie S Wilson; Nagalakshmi Keshava; Susan Hester; Deborah Segal; Weihsueh Chiu; Chad M Thompson; Susan Y Euling
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 4.  Transcriptome analysis using next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Kai-Oliver Mutz; Alexandra Heilkenbrinker; Maren Lönne; Johanna-Gabriela Walter; Frank Stahl
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 9.740

Review 5.  Using next-generation sequencing to isolate mutant genes from forward genetic screens.

Authors:  Korbinian Schneeberger
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 6.  Comparative overview of current international strategies and guidelines for genetic toxicology testing for regulatory purposes.

Authors:  Michael C Cimino
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  A 3D in vitro model of differentiated HepG2 cell spheroids with improved liver-like properties for repeated dose high-throughput toxicity studies.

Authors:  Sreenivasa C Ramaiahgari; Michiel W den Braver; Bram Herpers; Valeska Terpstra; Jan N M Commandeur; Bob van de Water; Leo S Price
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  Quantitative criteria for improving performance of buccal DNA for high-throughput genetic analysis.

Authors:  Jessica G Woo; Lisa J Martin; Lili Ding; W Mark Brown; Timothy D Howard; Carl D Langefeld; Charles J Moomaw; Mary Haverbusch; Guangyun Sun; Subba R Indugula; Hong Cheng; Ranjan Deka; Daniel Woo
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 2.797

Review 9.  Improving the human hazard characterization of chemicals: a Tox21 update.

Authors:  Raymond R Tice; Christopher P Austin; Robert J Kavlock; John R Bucher
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Identification of tubular injury microRNA biomarkers in urine: comparison of next-generation sequencing and qPCR-based profiling platforms.

Authors:  Rounak Nassirpour; Sachin Mathur; Mark M Gosink; Yizheng Li; Ahmed M Shoieb; Joanna Wood; Shawn P O'Neil; Bruce L Homer; Laurence O Whiteley
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  A Collaborative Initiative to Establish Genomic Biomarkers for Assessing Tumorigenic Potential to Reduce Reliance on Conventional Rodent Carcinogenicity Studies.

Authors:  J Christopher Corton; Constance A Mitchell; Scott Auerbach; Pierre Bushel; Heidrun Ellinger-Ziegelbauer; Patricia A Escobar; Roland Froetschl; Alison H Harrill; Kamin Johnson; James E Klaunig; Arun R Pandiri; Alexei A Podtelezhnikov; Julia E Rager; Keith Q Tanis; Jan Willem van der Laan; Alisa Vespa; Carole L Yauk; Syril D Pettit; Frank D Sistare
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.109

2.  Genome-wide expression screening in the cardiac embryonic stem cell test shows additional differentiation routes that are regulated by morpholines and piperidines.

Authors:  R H Mennen; N Hallmark; M Pallardy; R Bars; H Tinwell; A H Piersma
Journal:  Curr Res Toxicol       Date:  2022-09-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.