Literature DB >> 28682810

Spectral-Temporal Modulated Ripple Discrimination by Children With Cochlear Implants.

David M Landsberger1, Monica Padilla1,1, Amy S Martinez1, Laurie S Eisenberg1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A postlingually implanted adult typically develops hearing with an intact auditory system, followed by periods of deafness (or near deafness) and adaptation to the implant. For an early implanted child whose brain is highly plastic, the auditory system matures with consistent input from a cochlear implant. It is likely that the auditory system of early implanted cochlear implant users is fundamentally different than postlingually implanted adults. The purpose of this study is to compare the basic psychophysical capabilities and limitations of these two populations on a spectral resolution task to determine potential effects of early deprivation and plasticity.
DESIGN: Performance on a spectral resolution task (Spectral-temporally Modulated Ripple Test [SMRT]) was measured for 20 bilaterally implanted, prelingually deafened children (between 5 and 13 years of age) and 20 hearing children within the same age range. Additionally, 15 bilaterally implanted, postlingually deafened adults, and 10 hearing adults were tested on the same task. Cochlear implant users (adults and children) were tested bilaterally, and with each ear alone. Hearing listeners (adults and children) were tested with the unprocessed SMRT and with a vocoded version that simulates an 8-channel cochlear implant.
RESULTS: For children with normal hearing, a positive correlation was found between age and SMRT score for both the unprocessed and vocoded versions. Older hearing children performed similarly to hearing adults in both the unprocessed and vocoded test conditions. However, for children with cochlear implants, no significant relationship was found between SMRT score and chronological age, age at implantation, or years of implant experience. Performance by children with cochlear implants was poorer than performance by cochlear implanted adults. It was also found that children implanted sequentially tended to have better scores with the first implant compared with the second implant. This difference was not observed for adults. An additional finding was that SMRT score was negatively correlated with age for adults with implants.
CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study suggest that basic psychophysical capabilities of early implanted children and postlingually implanted adults differ when assessed in the sound field using their personal implant processors. Because spectral resolution does not improve with age for early implanted children, it seems likely that the sparse representation of the signal provided by a cochlear implant limits spectral resolution development. These results are supported by the finding that postlingually implanted adults, whose auditory systems matured before the onset of hearing loss, perform significantly better than early implanted children on the spectral resolution test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28682810      PMCID: PMC8905526          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  51 in total

1.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Relative contributions of temporal and place pitch cues to fundamental frequency discrimination in cochlear implantees.

Authors:  Johan Laneau; Jan Wouters; Marc Moonen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Current steering and results from novel speech coding strategies.

Authors:  Andreas Buechner; Martina Brendel; Beate Krüeger; Carolin Frohne-Büchner; Waldo Nogueira; Bernd Edler; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  The Effects of Acoustic Bandwidth on Simulated Bimodal Benefit in Children and Adults with Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Sterling W Sheffield; Michelle Simha; Kelly N Jahn; René H Gifford
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  A cost-utility scenario analysis of bilateral cochlear implantation.

Authors:  A Quentin Summerfield; David H Marshall; Garry R Barton; Karen E Bloor
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2002-11

6.  Fundamental-frequency discrimination using noise-band-vocoded harmonic complexes in older listeners with normal hearing.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Validation of a clinical assessment of spectral-ripple resolution for cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Elizabeth S Anderson; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients.

Authors:  Katrien Vermeire; Ilona Anderson; Mark Flynn; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Speech and music perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy: preliminary results.

Authors:  Christoph Arnoldner; Dominik Riss; Markus Brunner; Martin Durisin; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Jafar-Sasan Hamzavi
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  Factors influencing consistent device use in pediatric recipients of bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Matthew B Fitzgerald; Janet E Green; Yixin Fang; Susan B Waltzman
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2013-03-18
View more
  17 in total

1.  Effects of Age and Cochlear Implantation on Spectrally Cued Speech Categorization.

Authors:  Mishaela DiNino; Julie G Arenberg; Anne L R Duchen; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Speech Perception with Spectrally Non-overlapping Maskers as Measure of Spectral Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Erin R O'Neill; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-19

3.  Cognitive Abilities Contribute to Spectro-Temporal Discrimination in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.

Authors:  Benjamin J Kirby; Meredith Spratford; Kelsey E Klein; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Attention to speech, speech perception, and referential learning.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Derek M Houston
Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist       Date:  2018-09-11

5.  Spectral aliasing in an acoustic spectral ripple discrimination task.

Authors:  Jesse M Resnick; David L Horn; Anisha R Noble; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  How does aging affect recognition of spectrally degraded speech?

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Kara J Vasil; Taylor L Wucinich; Natalie Safdar; Lauren Boyce; Christina Roup; Rachael Frush Holt; Oliver F Adunka; Irina Castellanos; Valeriy Shafiro; Derek M Houston; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Single-Channel Focused Thresholds Relate to Vowel Identification in Pediatric and Adult Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Meisam K Arjmandi; Kelly N Jahn; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

Review 8.  Spectral Resolution Development in Children With Normal Hearing and With Cochlear Implants: A Review of Behavioral Studies.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn; Julie G Arenberg; David L Horn
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.674

9.  Spectral-temporally modulated ripple test Lite for computeRless Measurement (SLRM): A Nonlinguistic Test for Audiology Clinics.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Natalia Stupak; Justin M Aronoff
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  A Longitudinal Comparison of Environmental Sound Recognition in Adults With Hearing Aids Before and After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Michael S Harris; Aaron C Moberly; Ben L Hamel; Kara Vasil; Christina L Runge; William J Riggs; Valeriy Shafiro
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.674

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.