Literature DB >> 30130295

Cognitive Abilities Contribute to Spectro-Temporal Discrimination in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.

Benjamin J Kirby1, Meredith Spratford2, Kelsey E Klein3, Ryan W McCreery2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Spectral ripple discrimination tasks have received considerable interest as potential clinical tools for use with adults and children with hearing loss. Previous results have indicated that performance on ripple tasks is affected by differences in aided audibility [quantified using the Speech Intelligibility Index, or Speech Intelligibility Index (SII)] in children who wear hearing aids and that ripple thresholds tend to improve over time in children with and without hearing loss. Although ripple task performance is thought to depend less on language skills than common speech perception tasks, the extent to which spectral ripple discrimination might depend on other general cognitive abilities such as nonverbal intelligence and working memory is unclear. This is an important consideration for children because age-related changes in ripple test results could be due to developing cognitive ability and could obscure the effect of any changes in unaided or aided hearing over time. The purpose of this study was to establish the relationship between spectral ripple discrimination in a group of children who use hearing aids and general cognitive abilities such as nonverbal intelligence, visual and auditory working memory, and executive function. It was hypothesized that, after controlling for listener age, general cognitive ability would be associated with spectral ripple thresholds and performance on both auditory and visual cognitive tasks would be associated with spectral ripple thresholds.
DESIGN: Children who were full-time users of hearing aids for at least 1 year (n = 24, ages 6 to 13 years) participated in this study. Children completed a spectro-temporal modulated ripple discrimination task in the sound field using their personal hearing aids. Threshold was determined from the average of two repetitions of the task. Participants completed standard measurements of executive function, nonverbal intelligence, and visual and verbal working memory. Real ear verification measures were completed for each child with their personal hearing aids to determine aided SII.
RESULTS: Consistent with past findings, spectro-temporal ripple thresholds improved with greater listener age. Surprisingly, aided SII was not significantly correlated with spectro-temporal ripple thresholds potentially because this particular group of listeners had overall better hearing and greater aided SII than participants in previous studies. Partial correlations controlling for listener age revealed that greater nonverbal intelligence and visual working memory were associated with better spectro-temporal ripple discrimination thresholds. Verbal working memory, executive function, and language ability were not significantly correlated with spectro-temporal ripple discrimination thresholds.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that greater general cognitive abilities are associated with better spectro-temporal ripple discrimination ability, independent of children's age or aided SII. It is possible that these relationships reflect the cognitive demands of the psychophysical task rather than a direct relationship of cognitive ability to spectro-temporal processing in the auditory system. Further work is needed to determine the relationships of cognitive abilities to ripple discrimination in other populations, such as children with cochlear implants or with a wider range of aided SII.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30130295      PMCID: PMC6383507          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  26 in total

1.  Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Effects of age and hearing mechanism on spectral resolution in normal hearing and cochlear-implanted listeners.

Authors:  David L Horn; Daniel J Dudley; Kavita Dedhia; Kaibao Nie; Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  II. NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): measuring executive function and attention.

Authors:  Philip David Zelazo; Jacob E Anderson; Jennifer Richler; Kathleen Wallner-Allen; Jennifer L Beaumont; Sandra Weintraub
Journal:  Monogr Soc Res Child Dev       Date:  2013-08

4.  Comparing spatial tuning curves, spectral ripple resolution, and speech perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Anderson; David A Nelson; Heather Kreft; Peggy B Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Individual differences in language and working memory affect children's speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Meredith Spratford; Benjamin Kirby; Marc Brennan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Children's phoneme identification in reverberation and noise.

Authors:  C E Johnson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Validation of a clinical assessment of spectral-ripple resolution for cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Elizabeth S Anderson; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Language Outcomes in Young Children with Mild to Severe Hearing Loss.

Authors:  J Bruce Tomblin; Melody Harrison; Sophie E Ambrose; Elizabeth A Walker; Jacob J Oleson; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Sensory discrimination and intelligence: testing Spearman's other hypothesis.

Authors:  Ian J Deary; P Joseph Bell; Andrew J Bell; Mary L Campbell; Nicola D Fazal
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  2004

10.  Relationship between Auditory and Cognitive Abilities in Older Adults.

Authors:  Stanley Sheft; Valeriy Shafiro; Emily Wang; Lisa L Barnes; Raj C Shah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  Bottom-Up Signal Quality Impacts the Role of Top-Down Cognitive-Linguistic Processing During Speech Recognition by Adults with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Jessica H Lewis; Kara J Vasil; Christin Ray; Terrin N Tamati
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Audibility and Spectral-Ripple Discrimination Thresholds as Predictors of Word Recognition with Nonlinear Frequency Compression.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 1.245

Review 3.  Spectral Resolution Development in Children With Normal Hearing and With Cochlear Implants: A Review of Behavioral Studies.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn; Julie G Arenberg; David L Horn
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.674

4.  Distortion of Spectral Ripples Through Cochlear Implants Has Major Implications for Interpreting Performance Scores.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Gabrielle O'Brien
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  Spectral Modulation Detection Performance and Speech Perception in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Rosalie M Uchanski
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 1.636

6.  The contribution of spectral processing to the acquisition of phonological sensitivity by adolescent cochlear implant users and normal-hearing controls.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein; Donal G Sinex
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.482

7.  Effect of level on spectral-ripple detection threshold for listeners with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Authors:  Erik J Jorgensen; Ryan W McCreery; Benjamin J Kirby; Marc Brennan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Weighting of Prosodic and Lexical-Semantic Cues for Emotion Identification in Spectrally Degraded Speech and With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Margaret E Richter; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Basic Measures of Auditory Perception in Children: No Evidence for Mediation by Auditory Working Memory Capacity.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Udit Saxena
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  A surgeon-scientist's perspective and review of cognitive-linguistic contributions to adult cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-11-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.