Literature DB >> 32113324

Spectral aliasing in an acoustic spectral ripple discrimination task.

Jesse M Resnick1, David L Horn1, Anisha R Noble1, Jay T Rubinstein1.   

Abstract

Spectral ripple discrimination tasks are commonly used to probe spectral resolution in cochlear implant (CI), normal-hearing (NH), and hearing-impaired individuals. In addition, these tasks have also been used to examine spectral resolution development in NH and CI children. In this work, stimulus sine-wave carrier density was identified as a critical variable in an example spectral ripple-based task, the Spectro-Temporally Modulated Ripple (SMR) Test, and it was demonstrated that previous uses of it in NH listeners sometimes used values insufficient to represent relevant ripple densities. Insufficient carry densities produced spectral under-sampling that both eliminated ripple cues at high ripple densities and introduced unintended structured interference between the carriers and intended ripples at particular ripple densities. It was found that this effect produced non-monotonic psychometric functions for NH listeners that would cause systematic underestimation of thresholds with adaptive techniques. Studies of spectral ripple detection in CI users probe a density regime below where this source of aliasing occurs, as CI signal processing limits dense ripple representation. While these analyses and experiments focused on the SMR Test, any task in which discrete pure-tone carriers spanning frequency space are modulated to approximate a desired pattern must be designed with the consideration of the described spectral aliasing effect.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32113324      PMCID: PMC7112708          DOI: 10.1121/10.0000608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

1.  Effects of age and hearing mechanism on spectral resolution in normal hearing and cochlear-implanted listeners.

Authors:  David L Horn; Daniel J Dudley; Kavita Dedhia; Kaibao Nie; Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The development of a modified spectral ripple test.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spectral modulation detection and vowel and consonant identifications in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Aniket A Saoji; Leonid Litvak; Anthony J Spahr; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comparison of the Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test With the Arizona Biomedical Institute Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Marshall Lawler; Jeffrey Yu; Justin M Aronoff
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Deactivating stimulation sites based on low-rate thresholds improves spectral ripple and speech reception thresholds in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Zhou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spectral Ripple Discrimination in Normal-Hearing Infants.

Authors:  David L Horn; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Comparing auditory filter bandwidths, spectral ripple modulation detection, spectral ripple discrimination, and speech recognition: Normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Evelyn Davies-Venn; Peggy Nelson; Pamela Souza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Golbarg Mehraei; Shihab Shamma; Frederick J Gallun; Sarah M Theodoroff; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression on ACC Amplitude and Listener Performance.

Authors:  Benjamin James Kirby; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  The Effects of Static and Moving Spectral Ripple Sensitivity on Unaided and Aided Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Christi W Miller; Joshua G W Bernstein; Xuyang Zhang; Yu-Hsiang Wu; Ruth A Bentler; Kelly Tremblay
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  3 in total

1.  Bottom-Up Signal Quality Impacts the Role of Top-Down Cognitive-Linguistic Processing During Speech Recognition by Adults with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Jessica H Lewis; Kara J Vasil; Christin Ray; Terrin N Tamati
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 2.  Spectral Resolution Development in Children With Normal Hearing and With Cochlear Implants: A Review of Behavioral Studies.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn; Julie G Arenberg; David L Horn
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.674

3.  Role of semantic context and talker variability in speech perception of cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Erin R O'Neill; Morgan N Parke; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.840

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.